Feasibility and Promise of a Couple-Based HIV/STI Preventive Intervention for Methamphetamine-Using, Black Men Who have Sex with Men Authors
First Online: 16 July 2011 DOI:
Cite this article as: Wu, E., El-Bassel, N., Donald McVinney, L. et al. AIDS Behav (2011) 15: 1745. doi:10.1007/s10461-011-9997-8
Accumulating evidence supports couple-based approaches for HIV/STI preventive interventions. Yet, to date, no studies have examined couple-based sexual risk reductions intervention specifically for men who have sex with men (MSM) from populations with elevated rates of HIV/STI transmission, such as black MSM and methamphetamine-involved MSM. We pilot tested—using a pre-/post-test design—a seven-session couple-based intervention for black, methamphetamine-using, black MSM couples engaging in sexual risk. Feasibility was assessed via recruitment and retention rates; potential efficacy relied on self-reported sexual risk and drug use prior to and two months following intervention delivery. We enrolled 34 couples (
N = 68 men). Over 80% attended all seven intervention sessions, and retention exceeded 95% at two-month follow-up. At follow-up, participants reported significantly fewer sexual partners, fewer episodes of unprotected anal sex, and greater condom use with their main partner; participants also reported significantly less methamphetamine use, any illicit drug use, and number of illicit drugs used. These findings indicate that couple-based HIV/STI intervention is feasible and promising for at-risk black MSM couples.
Couples—Men who have sex with men
The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
El-Bassel N, Witte SS, Gilbert L, Wu E, Chang M, Hill J, et al. The efficacy of a relationship-based HIV/STD prevention program for heterosexual couples. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(6):963–9.
El-Bassel N, Witte SS, Gilbert L, Wu E, Chang M, Hill J, et al. Long-term effects of an HIV/STI sexual risk reduction intervention for heterosexual couples. AIDS Behav. 2005;9(1):1–13.
Harvey SM, Henderson JT, Thorburn S, Beckman LJ, Casillas A, Mendez L, et al. A randomized study of a pregnancy and disease prevention intervention for Hispanic couples. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004;36(4):162–9.
Koniak-Griffin D, Lesser J, Henneman T, Rong H, Xin H, Tello J, et al. HIV prevention for Latino adolescent mothers and their partners. West J Nurs Res. 2008;30(6):724–42.
Voluntary HIV-1 Counseling and Testing Efficacy Study Group. Efficacy of voluntary HIV-1 counselling and testing in individuals and couples in Kenya, Tanzania, and Trinidad: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2000;356(9224):103-12.
Jones DJ, Chitalu N, Ndubani P, Mumbi M, Weiss SM, Villar-Loubet O, et al. Sexual risk reduction among Zambian couples. SAHARA J. 2009;6(2):69–75.
Jones DL, Ross D, Weiss SM, Bhat G, Chitalu N. Influence of partner participation on sexual risk behavior reduction among HIV positive Zambian women. J Urban Health. 2005;82(3 Suppl 4):92–100.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report, 2007. Atlanta, GA: Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2009.
Burton J, Darbes LA, Operario D. Couples-focused behavioral interventions for prevention of HIV: Systematic review of the state of evidence. AIDS Behav. 2010;14(1):1–10.
Sullivan PS, Salazar L, Buchbinder S, Sanchez TH. Estimating the proportion of HIV transmissions from main sex partners among men who have sex with men in five US cities. AIDS. 2009;23(9):1153–62.
Peterson JL, Jones KT. HIV prevention for black men who have sex with men in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(6):976–80.
Colfax G, Shoptaw S. The methamphetamine epidemic: Implications for HIV prevention and treatment. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2005;2(4):194–9.
Halkitis PN, Parsons JT, Stirratt MJ. A double epidemic: crystal methamphetamine drug use in relation to HIV transmission among gay men. J Homosex. 2001;41(2):17–35.
Hart T, Peterson JL, Team CITfYS. Predictors of risky sexual behavior among young African American men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(7):1122–4.
Auerbach JD. Principles of positive prevention. J AIDS. 2004;37(Suppl 2):S122–5.
Crepaz N, Lyles CM, Wolitski RJ, Passin WF, Rama SM, Herbst JH, et al. Do prevention interventions reduce HIV risk behaviours among people living with HIV? A meta-analytic review of controlled trials. AIDS. 2006;20(2):143–57.
Johnson BT, Carey MP, Chaudoir SR, Reid AE. Sexual risk reduction for persons living with HIV: research synthesis of randomized controlled trials, 1993 to 2004. J AIDS. 2006;41(5):642–50.
Gilliam PP, Straub DM. Prevention with positives: a review of published research, 1998–2008. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2009;20(2):92–109.
Wu E, El-Bassel N, McVinney LD, Fontaine Y-M, Hess L. Adaptation of a couple-based HIV intervention for methamphetamine-involved African American men who have sex with men. Open AIDS J. 2010;4:123–31.
Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social and cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1986.
NIMH Multisite HIV/STD Prevention Trial for African American Couples Group. Eban HIV/STD risk reduction intervention: conceptual basis and procedures. J AIDS. 2008;49(Suppl 1):S15–27.
Eaton LA, West TV, Kenny DA, Kalichman SC. HIV transmission risk among HIV seroconcordant and serodiscordant couples: dyadic processes of partner selection. AIDS Behav. 2009;13(2):185–95.
Parsons JT, Schrimshaw EW, Wolitski RJ, Halkitis PN, Purcell DW, Hoff CC, et al. Sexual harm reduction practices of HIV-seropositive gay and bisexual men: serosorting, strategic positioning, and withdrawal before ejaculation. AIDS. 2005;19(Suppl 1):S13–25.
van Kesteren NM, Hospers HJ, Kok G. Sexual risk behavior among HIV-positive men who have sex with men: a literature review. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;65(1):5–20.
Smith DM, Richman DD, Little SJ. HIV superinfection. J Infect Dis. 2005;192(3):438–44.
Smith DM, Wong JK, Hightower GK, Ignacio CC, Koelsch KK, Petropoulos CJ, et al. HIV drug resistance acquired through superinfection. AIDS. 2005;19(12):1251–6.
NIMH Multisite HIV/STD Prevention Trial for African American Couples Group. Methodological overview of an African American couple-based HIV/STD prevention trial. J AIDS. 2008;49(1):S3–14.
McMahon JM, Tortu S, Torres L, Pouget ER, Hamid R. Recruitment of heterosexual couples in public health research: a study protocol. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3:24.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. RESPECT-2 – single session counseling protocol–rapid test 2007.
. Last accessed date 18 June 2011.
Metcalf CA, Douglas JM Jr, Malotte CK, Cross H, Dillon BA, Paul SM, et al. Relative efficacy of prevention counseling with rapid and standard HIV testing: a randomized, controlled trial (RESPECT-2). Sex Transm Dis. 2005;32(2):130–8.
Wu E, El-Bassel N, Witte SS, Gilbert L, Chang M, Morse P. Enrollment of minority women and their main sexual partners in an HIV/STI prevention trial. AIDS Educ Prev. 2005;17(1):41–52.
Ghanem KG, Hutton HE, Zenilman JM, Zimba R, Erbelding EJ. Audio computer assisted self interview and face to face interview modes in assessing response bias among STD clinic patients. Sex Transm Infect. 2005;81(5):421–5.
Newman JC, Des Jarlais DC, Turner CF, Gribble J, Cooley P, Paone D. The differential effects of face-to-face and computer interview modes. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(2):294–7.
Williams ML, Freeman RC, Bowen AM, Zhao Z, Elwood WN, Gordon C, et al. A comparison of the reliability of self-reported drug use and sexual behaviors using computer-assisted versus face-to-face interviewing. AIDS Educ Prev. 2000;12(3):199–213.
Stall R, Purcell DW. Intertwining epidemics: a review of research on substance use among men who have sex with men and its connection to the AIDS epidemic. AIDS Behav. 2000;4(2):181–92.
CrossRef Copyright information
© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011