Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 235–242

The factualization of uncertainty: Risk, politics, and genetically modified crops – a case of rape

  • Gitte Meyer
  • Anna Paldam Folker
  • Rikke Bagger Jørgensen
  • Martin Krayer von Krauss
  • Peter Sandøe
  • Geir Tveit
Article

DOI: 10.1007/s10460-004-8283-z

Cite this article as:
Meyer, G., Folker, A.P., Jørgensen, R.B. et al. Agric Hum Values (2005) 22: 235. doi:10.1007/s10460-004-8283-z

Abstract.

Mandatory risk assessment is intended to reassure concerned citizens and introduce reason into the heated European controversies on genetically modified crops and food. The authors, examining a case of risk assessment of genetically modified oilseed rape, claim that the new European legislation on risk assessment does nothing of the sort and is not likely to present an escape from the international deadlock on the use of genetic modification in agriculture and food production. The new legislation is likely to stimulate the kind of emotive reactions it was intended to prevent. In risk assessment exercises, scientific uncertainty is turned into risk, expressed in facts and figures. Paradoxically, this conveys an impression of certainty, while value-disagreement and conflicts of interest remain hidden below the surface of factuality. Public dialogue and negotiation along these lines are rendered impossible. The only option left to critics is to resort to claims of fear and to call for new risk assessments to be performed, on and on again. Science is allowing itself to be abused by accepting the burden of proof in matters more suited to reflection and negotiation. The specific challenge to science would be to take care of itself – rethinking the role and the limitations of science in a social context, and, thereby gaining the strength to fulfill this role and to enter into dialogue with the rest of society. Scientific communities appear to be obvious candidates for prompting reflection and dialogue on this issue.

Keywords

Conflicts of interestEuropean UnionGenetically modified oilseed rapePublic dialogueRisk assessmentScientific uncertaintyValue-disagreement

Abbreviations:

DKK

Danish Krone

EU

The European Union

GMO

Genetically Modified Organism

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gitte Meyer
    • 1
  • Anna Paldam Folker
    • 2
  • Rikke Bagger Jørgensen
    • 3
  • Martin Krayer von Krauss
    • 4
  • Peter Sandøe
    • 1
    • 2
  • Geir Tveit
    • 2
  1. 1.Danish Centre for Bioethics and Risk Assessment, Department of Large Animal ScienceRoyal Veterinary and Agricultural UniversityValbyDenmark
  2. 2.Danish Centre for Bioethics and Risk Assessment, Food and Resource Economics InstituteRoyal Veterinary and Agricultural UniversityDenmark
  3. 3.Danish Centre for Bioethics and Risk Assessment, Department of Plant ResearchRisø National LaboratoryDenmark
  4. 4.Department of Environment and ResourcesTechnical University of DenmarkDenmark