Making the horse drink: use of mini-CEX in an assessment for learning view
- Lambert Schuwirth
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Recently a very interesting study by Alberta Alves de Lima and co-authors was published in Advances in Health Sciences Education; taking the mini-CEX to the ‘lab’ to study in more controlled circumstances the contribution of the various wanted and unwanted factors to the scores (Alves de Lima et al. 2012). Their findings are in accordance with most findings in this domain which state that between 7 and 11 observations would suffice to achieve acceptable reliabilities (Williams et al. 2003). This is important as they have added another important piece to the puzzle of the quality of this method.
It would not be unfair to conclude that, so far, we are okay concerning reliability and construct validity of mini-CEX, but I cannot help thinking there is more. Quite frankly, I think this has to do with my own difficulties with using an instrument almost exclusively for testing purposes despite its considerable potential to help optimising learning in an educational context. If I say “learning”
- Alves de Lima, A., Conde, D., Costabel, J., Corso, J., & Van der Vleuten, C. (2012). A laboratory study on the reliability estimations of the mini-CEX. Advances in Health Sciences Education. doi:10.1007/s10459-011-9343-y.
- Bordage, G. (1987). An alternative approach to PMP’s: The “key-features” concept. In I. R. Hart & R. Harden (Eds.), Further developments in assessing clinical competence, proceedings of the second Ottawa conference (pp. 59–75). Montreal: Can-Heal Publications Inc.
- Cilliers, F. J., Schuwirth, L. W. T., Adendorff, H. J., Herman, N., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2010). The mechanisms of impact of summative assessment on medical students’ learning. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15, 695–715. CrossRef
- Cilliers, F. J., Schuwirth, L. W. T., Herman, N., Adendorff, H. J., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2012). A model of the pre-assessment learning effects of summative assessment in medical education. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 17, 39–53. CrossRef
- Frederiksen, N. (1984). The real test bias: Influences of testing on teaching and learning. American Psychologist, 39(3), 193–202. CrossRef
- Mezirow, J. (2002). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 74, 5–12.
- Regehr, G., & Norman, G. R. (1996). Issues in cognitive psychology: Implications for professional education. Academic Medicine, 71(9), 988–1001. CrossRef
- Shepard, L. (2009). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14.
- Van der Vleuten, C., & Schuwirth, L. (2005). Assessing professional competence: From methods to programmes. Medical Education, 39(3), 309–317. CrossRef
- van Merrienboer, J. J., & Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory in health professional education: Design principles and strategies. Medical Education, 44(1), 85–93. CrossRef
- Williams, M., Klamen, D., & McGaghie, W. (2003). Cognitive, social and environmental sources of bias in clinical performance ratings. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 15(4), 270–292. CrossRef
- Making the horse drink: use of mini-CEX in an assessment for learning view
Advances in Health Sciences Education
Volume 18, Issue 1 , pp 1-4
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Lambert Schuwirth (1) (2)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Flinders Innovation in Clinical Education, Health Professions Education, School of Medicine, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia
- 2. Flinders Innovation in Clinical Education, Health Professions Education, School of Medicine, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia