Barriers to undergraduate peer-physical examination of the lower limb in the health sciences and strategies to improve inclusion: a review
- Gordon James Hendry
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Peer-physical examination is a widely adopted and an integral component of the undergraduate curriculum for many health science programs. Unwillingness or perceived inability to participate in peer-physical examination classes may have a negative impact upon students’ abilities to competently conduct physical examinations of patients in future as registered health professionals. A literature review on the perceptions and attitudes of peer-physical examination of the lower limb amongst medical and health science students was conducted to identify potential barriers to participation, and to review strategies to improve participation in classes designed to develop clinical examination skills. A pragmatic search strategy of the literature from PubMed and Google Scholar published prior to June 2012 yielded 23 relevant articles. All articles were concerned with the views of medical students’ education and there were no articles explicitly addressing the role of peer-physical examination in health science disciplines. Several ethical issues were identified including feelings of coercion, embarrassment, and perceptions of a lack of consideration for cultural and religious beliefs. The available evidence suggests that barriers to participation may be overcome by implementing standard protocols concerned with obtaining informed written consent, adequate choice of peer-examiner, changing facilities and garment advice, and possible alternative learning methods.
- Bokken, L., Rethans, J., van Heurn, L., Duvivier, R., Scherpbier, A., & van der Vleuten, C. (2009). Students’ views on the use of real patients and simulated patients in undergraduate medical education. Academic Medicine, 84, 958–963. CrossRef
- Braunack-Mayer, A. J. (2001). Should medical students act as surrogate patients for each other? Medical Education, 35, 681–686. CrossRef
- Chen, J. Y., Yip, A. L. M., Lam, C. L. K., & Patil, N. G. (2011). Does medical student willingness to practise peer physical examination translate into action. Medical Teacher, 33, e528–e540. CrossRef
- Chinnah, T. I., de Bere, S. R., & Collett, T. (2011). Students’ views on the impact of peer physical examination and palpation as a pedagogic tool for teaching and learning living human anatomy. Medical Teacher, 33, e27–e36. CrossRef
- Das, M., Townsend, A., & Hasan, M. Y. (1998). The views of senior students and young doctors of their training in a skills laboratory. Medical Education, 32, 143–149. CrossRef
- Delany, C., & Frawley, H. (2011). We need a new model for obtaining students’ consent to conduct peer physical examinations. Academic Medicine, 86(5), 539. CrossRef
- Joyce, C. M., Stoelwinder, J. U., McNeil, J. J., & Piterman, L. (2007). Riding the wave: Current and emerging trends in graduates in Australian university medical schools. Medical Journal of Australia, 186, 309–312.
- Kahan, D. (2003). Islam and physical activity: implications for American sport and physical educators. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 74(3), 48–54.
- Koehler, N., & McMenamin, C. (2012) Would you consent to being examined by a medical student? Western Australian general public survey. Medical Teacher, e1-e11. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.668628.
- Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
- McLachlan, J. C., White, P., Donnely, L., & Patten, D. (2010). Student attitudes to peer physical examination: A qualitative study of changes in expressed willingness to participate. Medical Teacher, 32, e101–e105. CrossRef
- Myers, A., McDonagh, D. E., Gupta, K., Hull, R., Barker, D., Kay, L. J., et al. (2004). More ‘cries from the joints’: Assessment of the musculoskeletal system is poorly documented in routine paediatric clerking. Rheumatology, 43, 1045–1049. CrossRef
- O’Neill, P. A., Larcombe, C., Duffy, K., & Dorman, T. L. (1998). Medical students’ willingness and reactions to learning basic skills through examining fellow students. Medical Teacher, 20(5), 433–437. CrossRef
- Outtram, S., & Nair, B. R. (2008). Peer physical examination: Time to revisit? Medical Journal of Australia, 189, 274–276.
- Pols, J., Boendermaker, P. M., & Muntinghe, H. (2003). Incidence of and sequels to medical problems discovered in medical students during study related activities. Medical Education, 37, 889–894. CrossRef
- Power, D. (2011). In reply to Delany and Frawley. Academic Medicine, 86(5), 539. CrossRef
- Power, D. V., & Center, B. A. (2005). Examining the medical student body: Peer physical exams and genital, rectal, or breast exams. Teaching and Learning in Medicine An International Journal, 17(4), 337–343. CrossRef
- Rees, C. E. (2007). The influence of gender of student willingness to engage in peer physical examination: The practical implications of feminist theory of body image. Medical Education, 41, 801–807. CrossRef
- Rees, C. C., Bradley, P., & McLachlan, J. C. (2004). Exploring medical students’ attitudes towards peer physical examination. Medical Teacher, 26(1), 86–88. CrossRef
- Rees, C. E., Bradley, P., Collett, T., & McLachlan, J. C. (2005). “Over my dead body?”: The influence of demographics on students’ willingness to participate in peer physical examination. Medical Teacher, 27(7), 599–605. CrossRef
- Rees, C. E., Wearn, A. M., Vnuk, A. K., & Bradley, P. A. (2009a). Don’t want to show fellow students my naughty bits: Medical students’ anxieties about peer examination of intimate body regions at six schools across UK, Australasia and Far-East Asia. Medical Teacher, 31, 921–927. CrossRef
- Rees, C. E., Wearn, A. M., Vnuk, A. K., & Sato, T. J. (2009b). Medical students’ attitudes towards peer physical examination: Findings from and international cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Advances in Health Science Education, 14, 103–121. CrossRef
- Reid, K. J., Kgakololo, M., Sutherland, R. M., Elliot, S. L., & Dodds, A. E. (2012). First-year medical students willingness to participate in peer physical examination. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 24(1), 55–62. CrossRef
- Smithson, S., Hart, J., & Was, V. (2010). Students’ hopes and fears about early patient contact: Lessons to be learned about preparing and supporting students during the first year. Medical Teacher, 32, e24–e30. CrossRef
- Wearn, A., & Bhoopatkar, H. (2006). Evaluation of consent for peer physical examination: Students reflect on their clinical skills learning experience. Medical Education, 40, 957–964. CrossRef
- Wearn, A., & Vnuk, A. (2005). Medical students and peer physical examination: Two case studies of strategies to improve safety and increase acceptance. Focus on Health Professional Education, 7(2), 88–98.
- Wearn, A. M., Rees, C. E., Bradley, P., & Vnuk, A. K. (2008). Understanding student concerns about peer physical examination using an activity theory framework. Medical Education, 42, 1218–1226. CrossRef
- Barriers to undergraduate peer-physical examination of the lower limb in the health sciences and strategies to improve inclusion: a review
Advances in Health Sciences Education
Volume 18, Issue 4 , pp 807-815
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Clinical examination
- Health science students
- Lower extremity
- Occupational therapy
- Peer-physical examination
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. School of Science and Health, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797 Penrith, Sydney, NSW 2751, Australia