Core components of communication of clinical reasoning: a qualitative study with experienced Australian physiotherapists
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Communication is an important area in health professional education curricula, however it has been dealt with as discrete skills that can be learned and taught separate to the underlying thinking. Communication of clinical reasoning is a phenomenon that has largely been ignored in the literature. This research sought to examine how experienced physiotherapists communicate their clinical reasoning and to identify the core processes of this communication. A hermeneutic phenomenological research study was conducted using multiple methods of text construction including repeated semi-structured interviews, observation and written exercises. Hermeneutic analysis of texts involved iterative reading and interpretation of texts with the development of themes and sub-themes. Communication of clinical reasoning was perceived to be complex, dynamic and largely automatic. A key finding was that articulating reasoning (particularly during research) does not completely represent actual reasoning processes but represents a (re)construction of the more complex, rapid and multi-layered processes that operate in practice. These communications are constructed in ways that are perceived as being most relevant to the audience, context and purpose of the communication. Five core components of communicating clinical reasoning were identified: active listening, framing and presenting the message, matching the co-communicator, metacognitive aspects of communication and clinical reasoning abilities. We propose that communication of clinical reasoning is both an inherent part of reasoning as well as an essential and complementary skill based on the contextual demands of the task and situation. In this way clinical reasoning and its communication are intertwined, providing evidence for the argument that they should be learned (and explicitly taught) in synergy and in context.
- Ajjawi, R. (2009). Learning clinical reasoning and its communication: In physiotherapy practice. Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.
- Ajjawi, R., & Higgs, J. (2007). Using hermeneutic phenomenology to investigate how experienced practitioners learn to communicate clinical reasoning. The Qualitative Report, 12, 612–638.
- Ajjawi, R., & Higgs, J. (2008). Learning to reason: A journey of professional socialisation. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 13, 133–150. CrossRef
- Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (V. W. McGee, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
- Barrows, H. S., & Feltovich, P. J. (1987). The clinical reasoning process. Medical Education, 21, 86–91. CrossRef
- Beeston, S., & Simons, H. (1996). Physiotherapy practice: Practitioners’ perspectives. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 12, 231–242. CrossRef
- Benner, P. (1984). From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. California: Addison-Wesley Publishing.
- Bontekoe, R. (1996). Dimensions of the hermeneutic circle. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press International.
- Carter, S. M., & Little, M. (2007). Justifying knowledge, justifying method, taking action: Epistemologies, methodologies, and methods in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 17(10), 1316–1328. CrossRef
- Charon, R. (2001). Narrative medicine: A model for empathy, reflection, profession, and trust. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 286, 1897–1902. CrossRef
- Edwards, I., Jones, M., Carr, J., Braunack-Mayer, A., & Jensen, G. M. (2004a). Clinical reasoning strategies in physical therapy. Physical Therapy, 84, 312–335.
- Edwards, I., Jones, M., Higgs, J., Trede, F., & Jensen, G. (2004b). What is collaborative reasoning? Advances in Physiotherapy, 6, 70–83. CrossRef
- Finlay, L. (2003). Through the looking glass: Intersubjectivity and hermeneutic reflection. In L. Finlay & B. Gough (Eds.), Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences (pp. 105–119). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
- Hendrick, P., Bond, C., Duncan, E., & Hale, L. (2009). Clinical reasoning in musculoskeletal practice: Students’ conceptualizations. Physical Therapy, 89(5), 430–442. CrossRef
- Higgs, J., & Jones, M. (2008). Clinical decision making and multiple problem spaces. In J. Higgs, M. Jones, S. Loftus, & N. Christensen (Eds.), Clinical reasoning in the health professions (3rd ed., pp. 3–17). Edinburgh: Elsevier.
- Higgs, J., & McAllister, L. (2005). Learning to communicate clinical reasoning. In J. Higgs, A. Sefton, A. Street, L. McAllister, & I. Hay (Eds.), Communicating in the health and social sciences (pp. 254–259). Oxford: University Press.
- Kaufman, D. M., Laidlaw, T. A., & Macleod, H. (2000). Communication skills in medical school: Exposure, confidence and performance. Academic Medicine, 75, S90–S92. CrossRef
- Kuper, A., Lingard, L., & Levinson, W. (2008). Critically appraising qualitative research. BMJ, 337, a1035. CrossRef
- Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Lingard, L. (2007). The rhetorical ‘turn’ in medical education: What have we learned and where are we going? Advances in Health Sciences Education, 12, 121–133. CrossRef
- Lingard, L., & Haber, R. J. (1999). Teaching and learning communication in medicine: A rhetorical approach. Academic Medicine, 74, 507–510. CrossRef
- Lingard, L., Schryer, C., Garwood, K., & Spafford, M. (2003). ‘Talking the talk’: School and workplace genre tension in clerkship case presentations. Medical Education, 37(7), 612–620. CrossRef
- Loftus, S. (2009). Language in clinical reasoning: Towards a new understanding. Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.
- Loftus, S., & Higgs, J. (2008). Learning the language of clinical reasoning. In J. Higgs, M. Jones, S. Loftus, & N. Christensen (Eds.), Clinical reasoning in the health professions (3rd ed., pp. 339–348). Edinburgh: Elsevier.
- Mattingly, C. (1998). In search of the good: Narrative reasoning in clinical practice. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 12, 273–297. CrossRef
- May, S., Greasley, A., Reeve, S., & Withers, S. (2008). Expert therapists use specific clinical reasoning processes in the assessment and management of patients with shoulder pain: A qualitative study. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 54, 261–266.
- Monrouxe, L. V. (2010). Identity, identification and medical education: Why should we care? Medical Education, 44(1), 40–49. CrossRef
- Norman, G. R. (2005). Research in clinical reasoning: Past history and current trends. Medical Education, 39(4), 418–427. CrossRef
- Nugus, P., Bridges, J., & Braithwaite, J. (2009). Selling patients. British Medical Journal, 339, b5201.
- Salmon, P., & Young, B. (2011). Creativity in clinical communication: From communication skills to skilled communication. Medical Education, 45, 217–226. CrossRef
- Siminoff, L. A., & Step, M. M. (2005). A communication model of shared decision making: Accounting for cancer treatment decisions. Health Psychology, 24, S99–S105. CrossRef
- Smith, M., Higgs, J., & Ellis, E. (2008). Characteristics and processes of physiotherapy clinical decision making: A study of acute care cardiorespiratory physiotherapy. Physiotherapy Research International, 13(4), 209–222. CrossRef
- Smith, M., Higgs, J., & Ellis, E. (2010). Effect of experience on clinical decision making by cardiorespiratory physiotherapists in acute care settings. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 26(2), 89–99. CrossRef
- Tan, S. M., Ladyshewsky, R. K., & Gardner, P. (2010). Using blogging to promote clinical reasoning and metacognition in undergraduate physiotherapy fieldwork programs. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3), 355–368.
- Taylor, D., & Miflin, B. (2008). Problem-based learning: Where are we now? Medical Teacher, 30, 742–763. CrossRef
- Thornquist, E. (1994). Profession and life: Separate worlds. Social Science and Medicine, 39, 701–713. CrossRef
- Thornquist, E. (2001). Diagnostics in physiotherapy: Processes, patterns and perspectives. Part I. Advances in Physiotherapy, 3, 140–150. CrossRef
- Trede, F., & Higgs, J. (2003). Re-framing the clinician’s role in collaborative clinical decision making: Re-thinking practice knowledge and the notion of clinician-patient relationships. Learning in Health and Social Care, 2, 66–73.
- van Manen, M. (1997). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy (2nd ed.). London, ON: Althouse Press.
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language (A. Kozulin, Trans.). Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Windish, D. M., Price, E. G., Clever, S. L., Magaziner, J. L., & Thomas, P. A. (2005). Teaching medical students the important connection between communication and clinical reasoning. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 20, 1108–1113. CrossRef
- Core components of communication of clinical reasoning: a qualitative study with experienced Australian physiotherapists
Advances in Health Sciences Education
Volume 17, Issue 1 , pp 107-119
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Clinical reasoning
- Clinical skills
- Qualitative research
- Health professions education
- Industry Sectors