A follow-up study of medical students’ biomedical understanding and clinical reasoning concerning the cardiovascular system
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Novice medical students usually hold initial conceptions concerning medical domains, such as the cardiovascular system, which may contradict scientific explanations and thus hinder learning. The purpose of this study was to investigate which kinds of biomedical representations medical students constructed of the central cardiovascular system in their first and second years of study, and how the quality of these representations was related to the students’ success in clinical reasoning. Data for 119 medical students were collected in three phases: in the first year of study before and after a cardiovascular course and a follow-up in the second year of study. Biomedical and clinical assignments were utilised. The study revealed that students had a substantial number of different misconceptions, and they decreased only slightly over the period of instruction. Those students who had misconceptions concerning biomedical knowledge also performed poorly in clinical reasoning. Furthermore, those students whose clinical reasoning was excellent had improved their biomedical knowledge between the first and second year remarkably more than students with poorer clinical reasoning. Hence, biomedical understanding seems to act as a mediator in clinical reasoning among novice students. We suggest that domain-specific pedagogical training, which would help medical educators become aware of students’ typical misconceptions concerning biomedical knowledge and the role of this knowledge in clinical reasoning, should be carried out to improve medical education.
- Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Schmidt, H. G. (1992). On the role of biomedical knowledge in clinical reasoning by experts, intermediates and novices. Cognitive Science, 16, 153–184. CrossRef
- Boshuizen, H. P. A., Schmidt, H. G., Custers, E. J. F. M., & Van De Wiel, M. W. (1995). Knowledge development and restructuring in the domain of medicine: The role of theory and practice. Learning and Instruction, 5, 269–289. CrossRef
- Chi, M. T. H. (2008). Three types of conceptual change: Belief revision, mental model transformation, and categorical shift. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook on conceptual change research (pp. 61–82). New York: Routledge.
- Chi, M. T. H., & Roscoe, R. D. (2002). The process and challenges of conceptual change. In M. Limón & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change. Issues in theory and practice (pp. 3–27). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer. CrossRef
- De Bruin, A. B. H., Schmidt, H. G., & Rikers, R. M. J. P. (2005). The role of basic science knowledge and clinical knowledge in diagnostic reasoning: A structural equation modelling approach. Academic Medicine, 80(8), 765–773. CrossRef
- Duit, R. (1999). Conceptual change approaches in science education. In W. Schnotz, S. Vosniadou, & M. Carretero (Eds.), New perspectives on conceptual change (pp. 263–282). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
- Feltovich, P. J., Johnson, P. E., Moller, J. H., & Swanson, D. B. (1984). LCS: The role and development of medical knowledge in diagnostic expertise. In W. J. Clancey & E. H. Shortliffe (Eds.), Readings in medical artificial intelligence: The first decade (pp. 275–318). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
- Fyrenius, A., Silén, C., & Wirell, S. (2007). Students’ conceptions of underlying principles in medical physiology: An interview study of medical students’ understanding in a PBL curriculum. Advances in Physiology Education, 31, 364–369. CrossRef
- Kaufman, D. R., Keselman, A., & Patel, V. L. (2008). Changing conceptions in medicine and health. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 295–327). New York: Routledge.
- Kuipers, B., & Kassirer, J. P. (1984). Causal reasoning in medicine: Analysis of a protocol. Cognitive Science, 8, 363–385. CrossRef
- Limón, M., & Mason, L. (2002). Reconsidering conceptual change. Issues in theory and practice. Dordrecht, Germany: Kluwer. CrossRef
- Michael, J. A. (2007). What makes physiology hard for students to learn? Results of a faculty survey. Advances in Physiology Education, 31, 34–40. CrossRef
- Michael, J. A., Richardson, D., Rovick, A., Modell, H., Bruce, D., Horwitz, B., et al. (1999). Undergraduate students’ misconceptions about respiratory physiology. Advances in Physiology Education, 22, 127–135.
- Michael, J. A., Wenderoth, M. P., Modell, H. I., Cliff, W., Horwitz, B., McHale, P., et al. (2002). Undergraduates’ understanding of cardiovascular phenomena. Advances in Physiology Education, 26, 72–84.
- Modell, H. I. (2000). How to help students understand physiology? Emphasize general models. Advances in Physiology Education, 23, 101–107.
- Modell, H. I., Michael, J. A., Adamson, T., Goldberg, J., Horvitz, B. A., Bruce, D. S., et al. (2000). Helping undergraduates repair faulty mental models in the student laboratory. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 32, 142–146.
- Mikkilä-Erdmann, M., Ahopelto, I., Virtanen, H., Kääpä, P., & Olkinuora, E. (submitted). First-year medical students’ conceptual understanding and resistance to conceptual change concerning the central cardiovascular system.
- Patel, V. L., Evans, D. A., & Groen, G. J. (1989). Biomedical knowledge and clinical reasoning. In D. A. Evans & V. L. Patel (Eds.), Cognitive science in medicine: Biomedical modelling (pp. 53–112). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
- Patel, V. L., Evans, D. A., & Kaufman, D. R. (1990). Reasoning strategies and the use of biomedical knowledge by medical students. Medical Education, 24, 129–136. CrossRef
- Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Towards a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211–227. CrossRef
- Schmidt, H. G., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (1992). Encapsulation of biomedical knowledge. In A. E. Evans & V. L. Patel (Eds.), Advanced models of cognition for medical training and practice (pp. 265–282). New York: Springer.
- Sinatra, G., & Mason, L. (2008). Beyond knowledge: Learner characteristics influencing conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook on conceptual change research (pp. 560–582). New York: Routledge.
- Swanson, D. B., & Case, S. M. (1997). Assessment in basic science instruction: Directions for practice and research. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2, 71–84. CrossRef
- van de Wiel, M. W. J., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Schmidt, H. G. (2000). Knowledge restructuring in expertise development: Evidence from pathophysiological representations of clinical cases by students and physicians. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12(3), 323–355. CrossRef
- Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 45–69. CrossRef
- Wilhelmsson, N. (2010). From basic science knowledge to clinical understanding. Stockholm, Karolinska Institutet: Larserics Digital Print AB.
- Woods, N. N. (2007). Science is fundamental: The role of biomedical knowledge in clinical reasoning. Medical Education, 41, 1173–1177. CrossRef
- Woods, N. N., Brooks, L. R., & Norman, G. R. (2007). It all makes sense: Biomedical knowledge, causal connections and memory in the novice diagnostician. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 12, 405–415. CrossRef
- A follow-up study of medical students’ biomedical understanding and clinical reasoning concerning the cardiovascular system
Advances in Health Sciences Education
Volume 16, Issue 5 , pp 655-668
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Biomedical knowledge
- Clinical reasoning
- Medical education
- Cardiovascular system
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Teacher Education and Centre for Learning Research, University of Turku, 20014, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- 2. Department of Paediatrics and Medical Education Research and Development Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland