1.

M. J. Wooldridge, *Introduction to Multiagent Systems*. Wiley, 2002.

2.

Chesñevar, C.I., Maguitman, A., Loui, R. 2000“Logical models of argument,” ACM ComputSurv., Vol32337383

3.

H. Prakken and G. Vreeswijk, “Logical systems for defeasible argumentation,” in D. Gabbay, (ed.), *Handbook of Philosophical Logic*, Vol. 4, Kluwer Academic Publisher: Dordrecht 2002, pp. 219–318.

4.

M. Gelfond and V. Lifschitz, “Classical negation in logic programs and disjunctive databases,” *New Generation Comput*., pp. 365–385, 1991.

5.

García, A., Simari, G. 2004“Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach.”Theory and Practice of Logic Programming495138CrossRef 6.

Alchourrón, C., Gärdenfors, P., Makinson, D. 1985“ On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions.”Symbolic Logic J50510530

7.

H. Katsuno and A. Mendelzon, “On the difference between updating a knowledge base and revising it,” in P. Gardenfors (ed.), *Belief Revision*, Cambridge University Press, 1992, pp. 183–203.

8.

Gäardenfors, P. 1998Knowledge in Flux: Modelling the Dynamics of Epistemic StatesThe MIT Press, Bradford BooksCambridge MA

9.

J. L. Pollock, “Taking perception seriously,” in: *Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Autonomous Agent*, 1997, pp. 526–527.

10.

Doyle, J. 1979“A truth maintenance system.”Artif, Intell12231272

11.

Kleer, J. 1986“An assumption-based TMS.”Artif, Intell28127162

12.

Kleer, J. 1989# “A comparison of ATMS and CSP techniques.”

Sridharan, N. S. eds. Proceedings of the 11th IJCAIWorkshop on Practical Reasoning and RationalityDetroit, USA290296

13.

Elkan, C. 1990“A rational reconstruction of nonmonotonic truth maintenance systems.”Artif, Intell43219234

14.

D. McAllester, “Truth maintenance,” in R. Smith and T. Mitchell (eds.), *Proceedings of the 8th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. vol. 2., American Association for Artificial Intelligence*, AAAI Press, 1990, pp. 1109–1116.

15.

Forbus, K., Kleer, J. 1993)Building Problem SolversMIT PressCambridge, MA

16.

A. L. Brown,“Modal propositional semantics for reason maintenance systems,” in: *Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence*, 1985, pp. 178–183.

17.

Chesñevar, C., Maguitman, A., Loui, R. 2000“Logical models of argument”ACM Comput Surv32337383CrossRef 18.

C. Reed and T. E. Norman, *Argumentation Machines – New Frontiers in Argument and Computation*, vol. 9 of Series Argumentation Library, Springer, 2005.

19.

Prakken, H., Sartor, G. 1997“Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities”Appl, Non-classical Logics725752

20.

Rahwan, I., Ramchurn, S., Jennings, N., McBurney, P., Parsons, S., Sonenberg, L. 2003“ Argumentation-based negotiation”Knowl. Eng. Rev18343375CrossRef 21.

Carbogim, D., Robertson, D., Lee, J. 2000“Argument-based applications to knowledge engineering”Knowl. Eng. Rev15119149CrossRef 22.

C. I. Chesñevar, G. Simari, T. Alsinet and L. Godo,“A logic programming framework for possibilistic argumentation with vague knowledge,” in: *Proceedings of the International Conference in Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI 2004)*, Canada, 2004, pp. 76–84.

23.

C. I. Chesñevar, G. Simari, T. Alsinet, and L. Godo, “Modelling agent reasoning in a logic programming framework for possibilistic argumentation,” in: *Proceedings of the 2nd European Workshop on Multiagent Systems*. Barcelona, Spain, 2004, pp. 135–142.

24.

Simari, G.R., Loui R., P. 1992“A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation”Artif Intell53125157CrossRef 25.

J. W. Lloyd, *Foundations of Logic Programming*. Springer–Verlag, 1987.

26.

D. L. Poole, “On the comparison of theories: preferring the most specific explanation,” in: *Proceedings of the 9th IJCAI*s, 1985, pp. 144–147.

27.

Capobianco, M. 2003“Argumentación rebatible en entornos dinámicos”Universidad Nacional del SurBahía Blanca Argentina

28.

G. R. Simari, C. I. Chesñevar, and A. J. García, “The role of dialectics in defeasible argumentation,” in: *Proceedings of the XIV Conferencia Internacional de la Sociedad Chilena para Ciencias de la Computación*, 1994, pp. 111–121.

29.

Chesñevar, C., Dix, J., Stolzenburg, F., Simari, G. 2003“Relating defeasible and normal logic programming through transformation properties”Theor Comput Sci290499529CrossRef 30.

J. J. Alferes and L. M. Pereira, “On logic program semantics with two kinds of negation,” in: *Proceedings of the Joint International Conference and Symposium on Logic Programming*, USA, 1992, pp. 574–588.

31.

C. Chesñevar and G. R. Simari, “Distinguishing ground from nonground information in defeasible argumentation,” in: *Proceedings del I Congreso Argentino en Ciencias de la Computación*, Universidad Nacional del Sur, Argentina, 1995, pp. 527–538.

32.

A. J. García, C. I. Chesñevar, and G. R. Simari,“ Making argumentative systems computationally attractive,” in: *XIII International Conference of the Chilenean Computer Science Society*, 1993, pp. 335–344.

33.

C. Baral and M. Gelfond, “Reasoning agents in dynamic domains,” in: J. Minker, (ed.), *Workshop on Logic-Based Artificial Intelligence*, College Park, Maryland, Computer Science Department, University of Maryland, 1999.

34.

L. Amgoud and C. Cayrol,“On the use of an atms for handling conflicting desires,” in: *Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference (KR2004)*, 2004, pp. 194–202.

35.

Phan Minh, Dung. 1995“On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games”Artif. Intell77321358CrossRef