A Distributed Approach for Coordination of Traffic Signal Agents
- Ana L. C. Bazzan
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Innovative control strategies are needed to cope with the increasing urban traffic chaos. In most cases, the currently used strategies are based on a central traffic-responsive control system which can be demanding to implement and maintain. Therefore, a functional and spatial decentralization is desired. For this purpose, distributed artificial intelligence and multi-agent systems have come out with a series of techniques which allow coordination and cooperation. However, in many cases these are reached by means of communication and centrally controlled coordination processes, giving little room for decentralized management. Consequently, there is a lack of decision-support tools at managerial level (traffic control centers) capable of dealing with decentralized policies of control and actually profiting from them. In the present work a coordination concept is used, which overcomes some disadvantages of the existing methods. This concept makes use of techniques of evolutionary game theory: intersections in an arterial are modeled as individually-motivated agents or players taking part in a dynamic process in which not only their own local goals but also a global one has to be taken into account. The role of the traffic manager is facilitated since s/he has to deal only with tactical ones, leaving the operational issues to the agents. Thus the system ultimately provides support for the traffic manager to decide on traffic control policies. Some application in traffic scenarios are discussed in order to evaluate the feasibility of transferring the responsibility of traffic signal coordination to agents. The results show different performances of the decentralized coordination process in different scenarios (e.g. the flow of vehicles is nearly equal in both opposing directions, one direction has a clearly higher flow, etc.). Therefore, the task of the manager is facilitate once s/he recognizes the scenario and acts accordingly.
Supplementary Material (0)
- R. Allsop, and J. Charlesworth “Traffic in a signal controller network: an example of different signal timings inducing different routing,”. Traffic Eng. and Control, vol. 18, pp. 262–264, 1977.
- A. L. C. Bazzan, “A game-theoretic approach to distributed control of traffic signals,”. in Proceedings of the First Int. Conf. on Multi–Agent Systems (ICMAS) San Francisco. extended abstract, 1995.
- A. L. C. Bazzan, “Evolution of coordination as a metaphor for learning in multi–agent systems,” in G. Weiss (ed.), DAI Meets Machine Learning, no.1221 in LNAI. Springer–Verlag: Berlin Heidelberg, New York, pp. 117–136, 1997a.
- A. L. C. Bazzan, “An evolutionary game–theoretic approach for coordination of traffic signal agents,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Karlsruhe, 1997b.
- A. L. C. Bazzan, J. Wahle, and F. Klu¨ gl, “Agents in traffic modelling–from Reactive to Social Behaviour,” in Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Berlin/Heidelberg. Also appeared as Proc. of the U.K. Special Interest Group on Multi-Agent Systems (UKMAS), Bristol, UK, 1999.
- F. Busch, and G. Kruse, “MOTION–Ein neues Verfahren fu¨ r die sta¨ dtische Lichtsignalsteurung und seine Erprobung in Rahmen des EG–Programms ATT,” in Heureka 93, pp. 79–93, 1993
- S. Cammarata, D. McArthur, and R. Steeb, “Strategies of cooperation in distributed problem solving,” in Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence. Karlsruhe, F. R. of Germany, 1983, pp. 767–770.
- E. C. P., Chang, J. C. K. Lei, and C. J. Messer, “Arterial signal timing optimization using PASSER–II.” Technical Report 467, Texas Transportation Institute, 1988. BAZZAN 162
- S. L. Cohen, and J. D. C. Little, “The MAXBAND program for arterial timing plans,” Public Roads, vol. 46, no.2, pp. 61–65, 1982.
- J. Cuena, G. Ambrosino, and M. Boero, “A general knowledge–based architecture for traffic control: the KITS approach,” in Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Transportation Engineering,. California, 1992.
- M. Di Taranto, “UTOPIA, in Proceedings of the IFAC-IFIP-IFORS Conference on Control, Computers, Communication in Transportation. Paris, 1989.
- S. Elhadouaj, A. Drogoul, and S. Espie’,“How to combine reactivity and anticipation: the case of conflicts resolution in a simulated road traffic,” in Proceedings of the Multiagent Based Simulation (MABS), 2000.
- N. Findler, and J. Stapp, “Distributed approach to optimized control of street traffic signals,” Journal of Transportation Engineering, vol. 118, no.1, pp. 99–110, 1992.
- K. Fischer, N. Kuhn, H. Mu¨ ller, J. Mu¨ ller, M. Pischel, and A. Schroth, “Verteiltes Problemlo¨ sen in Transportwesen,” Information Management, vol. 2, pp. 32–40, 1993.
- K. Fischer, J. Mu¨ ller, M. Pischeland, and D. Schier, “A model for cooperative transportation scheduling,”in V. Lesser (ed.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multi–Agent Systems (ICMAS),1995, pp. 109–116.
- B. Foraste, and G. Scemana, “Surveillance and congested traffic control in Paris by expert system,” in IEEE Int. Conf. on Road Traffic Control, London, pp. 91–94, 1986.
- D. Fudenberg, and D. Levine, “Steady state learning and nash equilibrium,” Econometrica, vol. 61, pp. 547–573, 1993.
- A. Garland, and R. Alterman, 2004, “Autonomous agents that learn to better coordinate,” Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, vol. 8, no.3, 267–301, 2004. CrossRef
- N. Gartner, “OPAC–A demand–responsive strategy for traffic signal control,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 906, pp. 75–81, 1983.
- M. R., Genesereth, M. L. Ginsberg, and J. S. Rosenschein, “Cooperation without communication,” in Proceedings of the Fifth Nat. Conf. on Art. Intelligence, 1986.
- J. Halpern, and Y. Moses, “Knowledge and common knowledge in a distributed environment,” in Third Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, Vancouver, 1984.
- C. B. Harley, “Learning the evolutionary stable strategy,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 89, pp. 611–631, 1981. CrossRef
- H. Haugeneder and D. Steiner, “MECCA/UTS: A multi-agent scenario for cooperation in urban traffic’. in Proceeedings of the Special Interest Group on Cooperating Knowledge Based Systems, 1993.
- J. Henry, J. Farges, and J. Tuffal, “The PRODYN real time traffic algorithm,” in Proceedings of the Int. Fed. of Aut. Control (IFAC) Conf, Baden-Baden, 1983.
- F. Klu¨ gl, and A. L. C. Bazzan, “Simulation of adaptive agents learning heuristics for route choice in a commuter scenario,” in Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS), vol. 1. Bologna, Italy, extended abstract, pp. 217–218, 2002. CrossRef
- F. Klu¨ gl, and A. L. C. Bazzan, 2004,“Route decision behaviour in a commuting scenario,”Journal of Artificial Societies an Social Simulation, vol. 7, no.1, http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/7/1/1.html.
- F. Klu¨ gl, A. L. C. Bazzan, and J. Wahle, “Selection of information types based on personal utility-a testbed for traffic information markets,” in Proceedings of the Second International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS), Melbourne, Australia, 2003, pp. 377–384.
- W. Leutzbach, Introduction to the Theory of Traffic Flow. Springer, Berlin, 1988.
- G. List, and J. Pond, “A strategy for real-time control demand-sensitive signal networks,” in Advanced Air Transportation Technologies (AATT) Conference, 1989.
- M. W. Macy, and A. Flache, “Learning dynamics in social dilemmas,” in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 99, pp. 7229–7236, 2002. CrossRef
- J. Maynard-Smith, and G. R. Price, “The logic of animal conflict,” Nature, vol. 246, pp. 15–18, 1973. CrossRef
- J. Morgan, and J. Little, “Synchronizing traffic signals for maximal bandwidth,” Operations Research, vol. 12, pp. 897–912,1964.
- S. Ossowski, Co-ordination in artifical agent societies, social structures and its implications for autonomous problem-solving agents., no.1535 in Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer, 1999.
- P. Paruchuri, A. R. Pullalarevu, and K. Karlapalem, “Multi agent simulation of unorganized traffic,” in Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS), Bologna, Italy, 2002, vol. 1. pp. 176–183. CrossRef
- Robertson, “TRANSYT: A traffic network study tool,” Rep. LR 253, Road Res. Lab., London, 1969.
- J. Rosenschein, and M. Genesereth, “Deals among rational agents,” in Proceedings Nineth Int. Joint Conf. on Art. Intelligence,. 1985, pp. 91–99.
- R. Rossetti, R. Liu, D. Van Vliet, S. Bampi, and H. Cybis, “Applying an agent–based approach to traffic modeling,” in Workshop on Agents in Traffic and Transportation (at Autonomous Agents), Barcelona, 2000a.
- R. Rossetti, R. Liu, D. Van Vliet, and H. Cybis, “An agent–based framework for the assessment of drivers’ decision–making,” IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems, Dearborn (MI), USA, 2000b.
- R. J. F. Rossetti, R. H. Bordini, A. L. C. Bazzan, S. Bampi, R. Liu, and D. Van Vliet, “Using BDI agents to improve driver modelling in a commuter scenario,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 10, 5–6, pp. 47–72, 2002.
- A. E. Roth, and I. Erev, “Learning in extensive form games: experimental data and simple dynamic models in the intermediate term,” Games Econ. Behav, vol. 8, pp. 164–212,1995. CrossRef
- A. Schaerf, Y. Shoham, and M. Tennenholtz, “Adaptive balancing load: A study in multi-agent learning,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol. 2, pp. 475–500,1995.
- H. Strobel, Computer Controlled Urban Transportation. A Survey of Concepts, Methods and International Experiences, vol. 10 of IIASA Int. Series, John Wiley and Sons, 1982.
- TRANSYT-7F, “TRANSYT-7F user’s manual,” Transportation Research Center, University of Florida, 1988.
- F. Vanderborght, “PRODYN in Brussels,” in Traffic Technology International, Surrey, UK: International Press, 1995.
- J. Wahle, A. L. C. Bazzan, F. Klu¨ gl, and M. Schreckenberg, “The impact of real time information in a two route scenario using agent based simulation,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 10, 5–6, pp. 73–91, 2002.
- B. Wild, “SAPPORO–Toward an intelligent traffic management system,” in Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Transportation Engineering, California, 1992.
- C. Zozaya-Goristiza, and C. Hendrickson, “Expert systems for traffic signal setting assistance,” Journal of Transport. Engineering, vol. 2, pp. 113, 1987.
About this Article
- A Distributed Approach for Coordination of Traffic Signal Agents
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
Volume 10, Issue 1 , pp 131-164
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- coordination of agents
- evolutionary game-theory
- learning in multi-agent systems
- traffic signal control
- Industry Sectors
- Ana L. C. Bazzan (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Instituto de Informática, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, CP 15064, Porto Alegre, RS 91.501-970, Brazil