The Neutral—Niche Debate: A Philosophical Perspective
- Paul L. WennekesAffiliated withCommunity and Conservation Ecology Group, University of Groningen
- , James RosindellAffiliated withInstitute of Integrative and Comparative Biology, University of Leeds
- , Rampal S. EtienneAffiliated withCommunity and Conservation Ecology Group, University of Groningen Email author
Ecological communities around the world are under threat while a consensus theory of community structure remains elusive. In the last decade ecologists have struggled with two seemingly opposing theories: niche-based theory that explains diversity with species’ differences and the neutral theory of biodiversity that claims that much of the diversity we observe can be explained without explicitly invoking species’ differences. Although ecologists are increasingly attempting to reconcile these two theories, there is still much resistance against the neutral theory of biodiversity. Here we argue that the dispute between the two theories is a classic example of the dichotomy between philosophical perspectives, realism and instrumentalism. Realism is associated with specific, small-scale and detailed explanations, whereas instrumentalism is linked to general, large-scale, but less precise accounts. Recognizing this will help ecologists get both niche-based and neutral theories in perspective as useful tools for understanding biodiversity patterns.
- The Neutral—Niche Debate: A Philosophical Perspective
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Volume 60, Issue 3 , pp 257-271
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links