, Volume 40, Issue 12, pp 2512-2518,
Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Date: 04 Oct 2012

The Virginia Tech Response

This is an excerpt from the content

We believe that Dr. Albert King’s letter regarding the STAR system paper22 is not scientifically based, factually incorrect, and illustrates that he does not understand the STAR system’s methodology. All of our research from Virginia Tech on this subject has been peer reviewed and published in open journals. In contrast, Dr. King bases his comments on a single reference to an internal graduate student thesis that has not been peer reviewed, has not been published in a journal, and which is not publicly available. This is not how the scientific process works.

While studying our comments, we ask the reader to keep in mind that all of this debate comes down to a very simple question: do you want to buy a helmet that reduces head acceleration? The STAR system is a complex experimental methodology that combines exposure and injury risk based on current scientific knowledge. Simply stated, it provides independent data to consumers to illustrate which helmets lower head acceleration.

...
This comment refers to the article available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-012-0659-4.