Body-Worn Sensor Design: What Do Patients and Clinicians Want?
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
User preferences need to be taken into account in order to be able to design devices that will gain acceptance both in a clinical and home setting. Sensor systems become redundant if patients or clinicians do not want to work with them. The aim of this systematic review was to determine both patients’ and clinicians’ preferences for non-invasive body-worn sensor systems. A search for relevant articles and conference proceedings was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Current Contents Connect, and EEEI explore. In total 843 papers were identified of which only 11 studies were deemed suitable for inclusion. A range of different clinically relevant user groups were included. The key user preferences were that a body-worn sensor system should be compact, embedded and simple to operate and maintain. It also should not affect daily behavior nor seek to directly replace a health care professional. It became apparent that despite the importance of user preferences, they are rarely considered and as such there is a lack of high-quality studies in this area. We therefore would like to encourage researchers to focus on the implications of user preferences when designing wearable sensor systems.
- Bonato, P. Wearable sensors and systems. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 29(3):25–36, 2010. CrossRef
- Brownsell, S. J., D. A. Bradley, R. Bragg, P. Catlin, and J. Carlier. Do community alarm users want telecare? J. Telemed. Telecare. 6(4):199–204, 2000. CrossRef
- Carter, J., and M. Rosen. Unobtrusive sensing of activities of daily living: a preliminary report. In: Proceedings of the First Joint BMES/EMBS Conference, Oct 13–16, 1999. IEEE Press, 1999, p. 678.
- Chae, H., W. Cho, S. Kim, and K. Han. Usability studies on sensor smart clothing. In: Human-Computer Interaction Ambient, Ubiquitous and Intelligent Interaction, edited by J. Jacko. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 2009, pp. 725–730. CrossRef
- Dunne, L. E., S. Brady, B. Smyth, and D. Diamond. Initial development and testing of a novel foam-based pressure sensor for wearable sensing. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2(1):4, 2005. CrossRef
- Durfee, W., J. Carey, D. Nuckley, and J. Deng. Design and implementation of a home stroke telerehabilitation system. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2009:2422–2425, 2009.
- Fensli, R., and E. Boisen. Human factors affecting the patient’s acceptance of wireless biomedical sensors. In: Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies, edited by A. Fred, J. Filipe, and H. Gamboa. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2009, pp. 402–412.
- Fensli, R., J. Dale, P. O’Reilly, J. O’Donoghue, D. Sammon, and T. Gundersen. Towards improved healthcare performance: examining technological possibilities and patient satisfaction with wireless body area networks. J. Med. Syst. 34(4):767–775, 2009.
- Fensli, R., P. E. Pedersen, T. Gundersen, and O. Hejlesen. Sensor acceptance model—measuring patient acceptance of wearable sensors. Methods Inf. Med. 47(1):89–95, 2008.
- Fraile, J., J. Bajo, J. Corchado, and A. Abraham. Applying wearable solutions in dependent environments. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 14(6):1459–1467, 2010.
- Gamarnik, V., P. Shu, J. Malke, C. Chiu, K. Ben, J. Montes, et al. An integrated motion capture system for evaluation of neuromuscular disease patients. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2009:218–221, 2009.
- Gemperle, F., C. Kasabach, J. Stivoric, M. Bauer, and R. Martin. Design for wearability. In: Digest of Papers Second International Symposium on Wearable Computers, 1998, pp. 116–122.
- Giansanti, D., S. Morelli, G. Maccioni, and G. Costantini. Toward the design of a wearable system for fall-risk detection in telerehabilitation. Telemed. J. E. Health 15(3):296–299, 2009. CrossRef
- Giansanti, D., Y. Tiberi, G. Silvestri, and G. Maccioni. Toward the integration of novel wearable step-counters in gait telerehabilitation after stroke. Telemed. J. E. Health 15(1):105–111, 2009. CrossRef
- Haggard, P., and D. M. Wolpert. Disorders of body schema. In: Higher-order Motor Disorders: From Neuroanatomy and Neurobiology to Clinical Neurology, edited by H.-J. Freund. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 261–272.
- Hong, X., C. Nugent, W. Liu, J. Ma, S. McClean, B. Scotney, et al. Uncertain information management for ADL monitoring in smart homes. In: Intelligent Patient Management, edited by S. McClean, P. Millard, E. El-Darzi, and C. Nugent. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 2009, pp. 315–332.
- Kumar, S., K. Kambhatla, F. Hu, M. Lifson, and Y. Xiao. Ubiquitous computing for remote cardiac patient monitoring: a survey. Int. J. Telemed. Appl. 2008:459185, 2008.
- Kuper, A., L. Lingard, and W. Levinson. Critically appraising qualitative research. BMJ. 337:a1035, 2008.
- Lukowicz, P., T. Kirstein, and G. Troster. Wearable systems for health care applications. Methods Inf. Med. 43(3):232–238, 2004.
- Maluf-Filho, F. The importance of evidence-based medicine concepts for the clinical practitioner. Arq. Gastroenterol. 46(2):87–89, 2009. CrossRef
- Mihailidis, A., A. Cockburn, C. Longley, and J. Boger. The acceptability of home monitoring technology among community-dwelling older adults and baby boomers. Assist. Technol. 20(1):1–12, 2008. CrossRef
- Mountain, G., S. Wilson, C. Eccleston, S. Mawson, J. Hammerton, T. Ware, et al. Developing and testing a telerehabilitation system for people following stroke: issues of usability. J. Eng. Des. 21(2):223–236, 2010. CrossRef
- Noury, N., A. Galay, J. Pasquier, and M. Ballussaud. Preliminary investigation into the use of Autonomous Fall Detectors. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2008:2828–2831, 2008.
- Pantelopoulos, A., and N. G. Bourbakis. A survey on wearable sensor-based systems for health monitoring and prognosis. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern. C Appl. Rev. 40(1):1–12, 2010. CrossRef
- Perry, M. A., P. A. Hendrick, L. Hale, G. D. Baxter, S. Milosavljevic, S. G. Dean, et al. Utility of the RT3 triaxial accelerometer in free living: an investigation of adherence and data loss. Appl. Ergon. 41(3):469–476, 2010. CrossRef
- Prochazka, A., M. Gauthier, M. Wieler, and Z. Kenwell. The bionic glove: an electrical stimulator garment that provides controlled grasp and hand opening in quadriplegia. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 78(6):608–614, 1997. CrossRef
- Rowlands, A. V. Accelerometer assessment of physical activity in children: an update. Pediatr. Exerc. Sci. 19(3):252–266, 2007.
- Sawyer, C. Do it by design: an introduction to human factors in medical devices. FDA, 1997. http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm094957.htm.
- Schleyer, T. K. L., T. P. Thyvalikakath, and J. Hong. What is user-centered design? J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 138(8):1081–1082, 2007.
- Steele, R., A. Lo, C. Secombe, and Y. K. Wong. Elderly persons’ perception and acceptance of using wireless sensor networks to assist healthcare. Int. J. Med. Inf. 78(12):788–801, 2009. CrossRef
- Timmermans, A. A. A., H. A. M. Seelen, R. P. J. Geers, P. K. Saini, S. Winter, J. te Vrugt, et al. Sensor-based arm skill training in chronic stroke patients: results on treatment outcome, patient motivation, and system usability. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 18(3):284–292, 2010. CrossRef
- van Coevering, P., L. Harnack, K. Schmitz, J. Fulton, D. A. Galuska, and S. Gao. Feasibility of using accelerometers to measure physical activity in young adolescents. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 37(5):867–871, 2005. CrossRef
- Veltink, P. H., H. B. Bussmann, W. de Vries, W. L. Martens, and R. C. Van Lummel. Detection of static and dynamic activities using uniaxial accelerometers. IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng. 4(4):375–385, 1996. CrossRef
- Wilson, S., R. Davies, T. Stone, J. Hammerton, P. Ware, S. Mawson, N. Harris, C. Eccleston, H. Zheng, N. Black, and G. Mountain. Developing a telemonitoring system for stroke rehabilitation. In: Proceedings of Ergonomics Society Annual Conference, 2007.
- Body-Worn Sensor Design: What Do Patients and Clinicians Want?
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
Volume 39, Issue 9 , pp 2299-2312
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Wearable sensors
- User preferences
- Medical devices
- User-centered design
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Medical Engineering Solutions in Osteoarthritis Centre of Excellence, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College London, Room 7L13, London, W6 8RF, UK
- 2. Human Performance Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK