Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 120–124

Technical Details of Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Colorectal Cancer and Its Impact on Staging

Authors

    • Departments of AnatomyMichigan State University, McLaren Regional Medical Center
    • Departments of SurgeryMichigan State University, McLaren Regional Medical Center
  • David Wiese
    • Departments of PathologyMcLaren Regional Cancer Center
  • Julio Badin
    • Departments of PathologyMcLaren Regional Cancer Center
  • Thomas Beutler
    • Departments of SurgeryMichigan State University, McLaren Regional Medical Center
  • Dean Nora
    • Departments of SurgeryMichigan State University, McLaren Regional Medical Center
  • B. K. Ganatra
    • Departments of GastroenterologyMcLaren Regional Cancer Center
  • Dilip Desai
    • Departments of GastroenterologyMcLaren Regional Cancer Center
  • S. Kaushal
    • Departments of GastroenterologyMcLaren Regional Cancer Center
  • M. Nagaraju
    • Departments of GastroenterologyMcLaren Regional Cancer Center
  • Madan Arora
    • Departments of Medical OncologyMcLaren Regional Cancer Center
  • Trevor Singh
    • Departments of Medical OncologyMcLaren Regional Cancer Center
Editorial

DOI: 10.1007/s10434-000-0120-z

Cite this article as:
Saha, S., Wiese, D., Badin, J. et al. Ann Surg Oncol (2000) 7: 120. doi:10.1007/s10434-000-0120-z

Abstract

Background: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping for melanoma and breast cancer has greatly enhanced the identification of micrometastases in many patients, thereby upstaging a subset of these patients. The purpose of this study was to see if SLN mapping technique could be used to identify SLNs in colorectal cancer and to assess its impact on pathological staging and treatment.

Methods: At the time of surgery, 1 ml of Lymphazurin 1% was injected subserosally around the tumor without injecting into the lumen. The first to fourth blue nodes identified were considered the SLNs, which have the highest probability to contain metastases. A standard oncological resection of the bowel was then performed. Multilevel microsections of the SLNs, including a detailed pathological examination of the entire specimen, was performed.

Results: SLN was successfully identified in 85 (98.8%) of 86 patients. In 85 patients, there were 1367 (16 per patient) lymph nodes examined, of which 140 (1.6 per patient) were identified as SLNs. In 53 (95%) of 56, of whom the SLNs were without metastases (negative), all other non-SLNs also were negative. In 29 (34% of 85) patients, SLNs were positive for metastases; in 14 of the 29 patients, other non-SLNs also were positive in addition to the SLNs. In the other 15 of the 29 patients (18% of 85 patients), SLNs were the only site of metastases, and all other non-SLNs were negative. In 7 patients (8.2% of 85 patients), micrometastases were identified only in 1 or 2 of the 10 sections of a single SLN. In five of seven patients, such micrometastases were detected by hematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemistry; in the other two patients, it was detected only by immunohistochemistry. In patients with negative SLNs, the rate of occurrence of micrometastases in non-SLNs was 5 (0.4%) of 1184 lymph nodes.

Conclusions: SLN mapping can be performed easily in colorectal cancer patients, with an accuracy of more than 95%. The identification of submicroscopic lymph node metastases by this technique may have upstaged these patients (18%) from stage I/II to stage III disease, who may then benefit from further adjuvant chemotherapy.

Key Words

Sentinel lymph node mappingColorectal cancer
Download to read the full article text

Copyright information

© The Society of Surgical Oncology, Inc. 2000