Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial orienting in the visual field: a unified perceptual space?

  • Short Report
  • Published:
Cognitive Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Visual attention can be oriented toward a spatial location in the visual field exogenously by an abrupt onset of a peripheral cue. In a series of behavioral studies on exogenous orienting of attention with a double-cue paradigm, we demonstrated a functional subdivision of perceptual space in the visual field. Specifically, inhibition of return (IOR) is much stronger at periphery relative to perifoveal visual field up to approximately 15° eccentricity, suggesting two dissociable functional areas in the visual field. To further investigate the generality of this functional subdivision of the visual field, we measured IOR effects with another single-cue paradigm and applied a very short cue-target interval that was typically anticipated not to observe any inhibitory effect at all. Consistent with this expectation, no IOR effects at the eccentricities up to 15° were observed. However, significant IOR effects beyond 15° eccentricities were consistently demonstrated. These results not only revealed an early onset of IOR for more peripheral stimuli, but also confirmed that the perceptual space in the visual field is not homogeneous but underlies a functional subdivision with a border of ca. 15° eccentricity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bao Y, Pöppel E (2007) Two spatially separated attention systems in the visual field: evidence from inhibition of return. Cogn Process 8:37–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bao Y, Zhou J, Fu L (2004) Aging and the time course of inhibition of return in a static environment. Acta Neurobiol Exp 64:403–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Bao Y, Sander T, Trahms L, Pöppel E, Lei Q, Zhou B (2011) The eccentricity effect of inhibition of return is resistant to practice. Neurosci Lett 500:47–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett PJ, Pratt J (2001) The spatial distribution of inhibition of return. Psychol Sci 12:76–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berlucchi G (2006) Inhibition of return: a phenomenon in search of a mechanism and a better name. Cogn Neuropsychol 23:1065–1074

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berlucchi G, Tassinari G, Marzi CA, Di Stefano M (1989) Spatial distribution of the inhibitory effect of peripheral non-informative cues on simple reaction time to non-fixated visual targets. Neuropsychologia 27:201–221

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frost D, Pöppel E (1976) Different programming modes of human saccadic eye movements as a function of stimulus eccentricity: indications of a functional subdivision of the visual field. Biol Cybern 23:39–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kingstone A, Pratt J (1999) Inhibition of return is composed of attentional and oculomotor processes. Percept Psychophys 61:1046–1054

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lei Q, Bao Y (2012) The eccentricity effect of inhibition of return is independent of cortical magnification. J Vis (in press)

  • Popovic Z, Sjöstrand J (2001) Resolution, separation of retinal ganglion cells, and cortical magnification in humans. Vision Res 41:1313–1319

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pöppel E, Harvey LO Jr (1973) Light-difference threshold and subjective brightness in the periphery of the visual field. Psychol Forsch 34:145–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Pöppel E, von Cramon D, Backmund H (1975) Eccentricity specific dissociation of visual functions in patients with lesions of the central visual pathways. Nature 256:489–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Posner MI, Cohen Y (1984) Components of visual orienting. In: Bouma H, Bouwhuis DG (eds) Attention and performance X. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 531–556

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapir A, Soroker N, Berger A, Henik A (1999) Inhibition of return in spatial attention: direct evidence for collicular generation. Nat Neurosci 2:1053–1054

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stoerig P, Pöppel E (1986) Eccentricity-dependent residual target-detection in visual field defects. Exp Brain Res 64:469–475

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tassinari G, Aglioti S, Chelazzi L, Marzi CA, Berlucchi G (1987) Distribution in the visual field of the costs of voluntarily allocated attention and of the inhibitory after-effects of covert orienting. Neuropsychologia 25:55–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by grants from the national Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30670703 and No. 91120004).

Conflict of interest

This supplement was not sponsored by outside commercial interests. It was funded entirely by ECONA, Via dei Marsi, 78, 00185 Roma, Italy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yan Bao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bao, Y., Wang, Y. & Pöppel, E. Spatial orienting in the visual field: a unified perceptual space?. Cogn Process 13 (Suppl 1), 93–96 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0469-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0469-5

Keywords

Navigation