Evaluation of the diagnostic value of tumor markers with ROC and logistic regression in gastrocolic tumors
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical significance of multiple tumor markers (CEA, AFP, CA72-4 and CA19-9) in patients with gastrocolic tumors by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and stepwise logistic regression (LR) analysis.
The serum concentrations of CEA, AFP, CA72-4 and CA19-9 were measured with electrochemiluminescence immunoassay in 126 patients with gastrocolic tumors, 137 patients with benign gastrocolic disorders and 109 healthy controls. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of CEA, AFP, CA72-4 and CA19-9 and stepwise LR results were compared by sensitivity, specificity, Youden’s index and positive likelihood ratio/negative likelihood ratio.
The levels of four tested tumor markers in patients with gastrocolic tumors were significantly higher than those in benign gastrocolic group and normal controls. In the benign gastrocolic group, the AUC from stepwise logistic regression was larger than the AUC of four tumor markers respectively. Sensitivity, Youden’s index and positive likelihood ratio/negative likelihood ratio were the highest in the combination assay of CA72-4, CEA, and CA19-9, as compared with one of the tumor markers alone.
The use of ROC established by LR analysis model improved the diagnostic accuracy of gastrocolic tumors. For the screening of gastrocolic tumors, the AUC value of the combination probability index (sensitivity and specificity) was significantly higher than the values of the different tumour markers.
- Brumback LC, Pepe MS, Alonzo TA. Using the ROC curve for gauging treatment effect in clinical trials. Stat Med, 2006, 25: 575–590. CrossRef
- Molodianovitch K, Faraggi D, Reiser B. Comparing the areas under two correlated ROC curves: parametric and non-parametric approaches. Biom J, 2006, 48: 745–757. CrossRef
- Rahmanian PB, Kwiecien G, Langebartels G, et al. Logistic risk model predicting postoperative renal failure requiring dialysis in cardiac surgery patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2011 [Epub ahead of print].
- Chuanhua Yu. SPSS and statistic analysis. Beijing: Electronic Industry Press, 2007. 356–408.
- Lothar Thomas. Clinical laboratory diagnostics: use and assessment of clinical laboratory results. Amazon.co.uk, 1998. 983–1097.
- Ferroni P, Palmirotta R, Spila A, et al. Prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen and vascular endothelial growth factor tumor tissue content in colorectal cancer. Oncology, 2006, 71: 176–184. CrossRef
- Hotakainen K, Tanner P, Alfthan H, et al. Comparison of three immunoassays for CA 19-9. Clin Chim Acta, 2009, 400: 123–127. CrossRef
- Lai IR, Lee WJ, Huang MT, et al. Comparison of serum CA72-4, CEA, TPA, CA19-9 and CA125 levels in gastric cancer patients and correlation with recurrence. Hepatogastroenterology, 2002, 49: 1157–1160.
- Pepe MS, Cai T, Longton G. Combining predictors for classification using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Biometrics, 2006, 62: 221–229. CrossRef
- Troxler S, Lalonde T, Wilson JR. Exact logistic models for nested binary data. Stat Med, 2011, 30: 866–876. CrossRef
- Louhimo J, Kokkola A, Alfthan H, et al. Preoperative hCGbeta and CA 72-4 are prognostic factors in gastric cancer. Int J Cancer, 2004, 111: 929–933. CrossRef
- Hand DJ. Evaluating diagnostic tests: the area under the ROC curve and the balance of errors. Stat Med, 2010, 29: 1502–1510.
- Evaluation of the diagnostic value of tumor markers with ROC and logistic regression in gastrocolic tumors
The Chinese-German Journal of Clinical Oncology
Volume 10, Issue 11 , pp 650-653
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- gastrocolic tumor
- tumor marker (TM)
- receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve
- logistic regression (LR) analysis