Abstract
This article looks at the “New Great Game” as the most widely used metaphor for the geopolitical dynamics of Central Asia. Its focus is on Kazakhstan and Europe with particular reference to energy policies. The European approach to Kazakhstan is conditioned by its energy security priorities with issues of democracy and human rights relegated to the margins. For Kazakhstan, the article suggests that the game is played with an eye to regime legitimacy, territorial integrity, and international recognition. Relations between Kazakhstan, China and Russia are also examined. Some of the limitations and strengths of the Great Game metaphor are analysed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
“Nazarbayev Calls on Countries to Follow G-Global Principles, Maximise Economic Development”, The Astana Times, 27 May 2014. Available at http://astanatimes.com/2014/05/nazarbayev-calls-countries-follow-g-global-principles-maximise-economic-development/, accessed at 24 November, 2015.
Phrase used by President Medvedev in 2008.
Currently, 655 Afghan students take their education in Kazakhstani universities.
“Gumanitarnuyu pomoshch” na summu okolo 2 millionov dollarov vydelil Kazakhstan Afganistanu’, Tengri News, 19 May 2014, available at: http://tengrinews.kz/kazakhstan_news/gumanitarnuyu-pomosch-summu-okolo-2-millionov-dollarov-255508/, accessed 17 October, 2015.
“Peacekeeping Operations in Iraq”, The Embassy of the Republic of Kazakhstan in the United States of America, available at: http://www.kazakhembus.com/content/peacekeeping-operations-iraq, accessed 17 October 2015.
Vinokurov, E. (2015, eds.) EDB Eurasian Integration Barometer, Analytical Report #33 (2015), p. 29, available at: http://www.eabr.org/general//upload/EDB_Centre_Analytical_Report_33_Full_Rus.pdf, accessed 29 November 2015
Maçães, B. (2015), “We are all Eurasian now”, Financial Times (London), 25 November 2015.
General Secretariat of the Council (2007), European Union and Central Asia: Strategy for a New Partnership, Brussels: European Communities.
Oil can be transported by ship much easier than gas so accessing pipelines on the other side of the Caspian is an option for Kazakhstan. For gas, a pipeline is the only feasible route.
References
Ambrosio T, Lange W (2014) Mapping Kazakhstan’s geopolitical code: an analysis of Nazarbayev’s presidential addresses, 1997–2014. Eurasian Geogr Econ 55:5
Anceschi L (2014) The tyranny of pragmatism: EU–Kazakhstani relations. Europe-Asia Stud 66(1):1–24
Baran Z, Starr F, Cornell S (2006) Islamic radicalism in Central Asia and the Caucasus: implications for the EU. D.C., Johns Hopkins University, Washington
Beng OK (2014) The Eurasian core and its edges: dialogues with Wang Gungwu on the history of the world. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore
Berti B, Mikulova K, Popescu N (2015) Democratization in EU foreign policy: new member states as drivers of democracy promotion. Routledge, London
Bohnenberger-Rich S (2015) China and Kazakhstan: economic hierarchy, dependency and political power? Unpublished PhD thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science.
Bossuyt F, Kubicek P (2015) Favouring leaders over laggards: Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. In: Wetzel A, Orbie J (eds) The substance of EU democracy promotion: concepts and cases. Palgrave Macmillan, London
Bougher L (2012) The Case for Metaphor in Political Reasoning and Cognition. Political Psychol 33(1):145–163
Burkhanov A (2013) Ethnic state versus civic-nation state in Kazakhstan: national identity discourse in Kazakh- and Russian media of Kazakhstan. PhD Dissertation, Indiana University
Casey M (2015) Take note, Putin: Kazakhstan celebrates 550 years of statehood. The Diplomat, 14 September.
Chyong C, Slavkova L, & Tcherneva V (2015) Europe’s Alternatives to Russian Gas. European Council on Foreign Relations, available at: http://www.ecfr.eu/article/commentary_europes_alternatives_to_russian_gas311666, accessed 1December, 2015.
Clarke M (2014) Kazakh responses to the rise of China: between Elite Bandwagoning and social ambivalence? In: Horesh N, Kavalski E (eds) Asian Thought on China’s Changing International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London
Collins N, Cottey A (2012) Understanding Chinese politics: an introduction to government in the People’s Republic of China. Manchester University Press, Manchester
Contessi N (2015) Foreign and security policy diversification in Eurasia: issue splitting, co-alignment, and relational power. Probl Post-Communism 62:5
Cooley A (2012a) “The New Great Game in Central Asia: geopolitics in a post-western world”, Foreign Affairs, 7 August.
Cooley A (2012b) Great Games, local rules: the new power contest in Central Asia. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Cummings S (2003) Eurasian Bridge or Murky Waters between East and West? Ideas, Identity and Output in Kazakhstan’s Foreign Policy. J Communist Stud Transit Polit 19(3):139–155
Daly J (2015) Can Turkmen Gas Disrupt Gazprom’s EU Market? Silk Road Reporters, 8 May.
Denzin N (1975) Play, games and interaction: the contexts of childhood socialization. Sociol Q 16(4):458–478
Domjan P, Stone M (2010) A Comparative Study of Resource Nationalism in Russia and Kazakhstan 2004-2008. Europe-Asia Stud 62(1):35–62
Edwards M (2010) The New Great Game and the New Great Gamers: disciples of Kipling and Mackinder. Cent Asia Surv 22(1):83–102
Gubaidullina M (2011) OSCE strategy for Central Asia at the new phase of relationship: the Kazakh context. Istoriya 2:7
Holm-Hansen J (1999) Political Integration in Kazakhstan. In: Kolstø P (ed) Nation-building and ethnic integration in Post-Soviet Societies: an investigation of Latvia and Kazakhstan. Boulder CO, Westview Press
Hopkirk P (1992) The Great Game: the struggle for empire in Central Asia. Kodansha Globe, New York
Hopkirk P (2002) The Great Game Revisited? Asian Aff 33(1):58–63
Howie P, Atakhanova Z (2014) Resource boom and inequality: Kazakhstan as a case study. Resour Policy 39:71–79
Huizinga J (1949) Homo Ludens: a study of the play element in culture. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London
Iseri E (2009) The US Grand Strategy and the Eurasian Heartland in the Twenty-First Century. Geopolitics 14
Jacques, M. (2009) When China Rules the World: The End of the Western World and the Birth of a New Global Order. Penguin Books.
Khidirbekughli D (2003) US geostrategy in Central Asia: a Kazakh perspective. Comp Strateg 22(2):159–167
Kim Y, Blank S (2013) Same bed, different dreams: China’s ‘peaceful rise’ and Sino–Russian rivalry in Central Asia. J Contemp China 22:83
Kourmanova A, (2015) National Views: Kazakhstan. In Peyrouse S (ed.) How does Central Asia View the EU?, Working Paper 18 (EUCAM).
Kydd A (2015) International Relations Theory: the rationalist approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Laruelle M, Peyrouse S (2013) Globalizing Central Asia: geopolitics and the challenges of economic development. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk
Laumulin M (2000) Kazakhstan and the West: relations during the 1990s in retrospect. Central Asia and the Caucasus, available at: http://www.ca-c.org/journal/2000/journal_eng/eng02_2000/05.laum.shtml, accessed 15 November, 2015.
Lomagin N (2012) Interest groups in Russian Foreign Policy: the invisible hand of the Russian Orthodox Church. Int Polit 49(4):498–516
Mackinder H (1904) The Geographical Pivot of History. Geogr Soc 23:4
Mantel R (2015) EU-Central Asia Relations in the Energy Sector with a Special Focus on Kazakhstan. L’Europe en Formation 1:375
Morrison A (2014) Introduction: Killing the Cotton Canard and Getting Rid of the Great Game: Rewriting the Russian Conquest of Central Asia, 1814–1895. Cent Asian Surv 33(2):131–142
Neumann I & Wigen E (2013) The Importance of the Eurasian Steppe to the Study of International Relations. J Int Relat Dev 16.
Olcott M (1995) Soviet Kazakhstan: the demographics of ethnic politics. Probl Post-Communism 42:2
Putz, C (2015) Energy Dominates Kazakhstan-Europe Relationship. The Diplomat, 6 November.
Schatz E (2005) Reconceptualizing clans: kinship networks and statehood in Kazakhstan. National Pap 33(2):231–254
Schatz E, Maltseva E (2012) Kazakhstan’s Authoritarian Persuasion. Post-Soviet Affairs 28(1):45–65
Shkolnikov V (2011) The 2010 OSCE Kazakhstan Chairmanship: carrot devoured, results missing. EUCAM 15
Steans J, Pettiford L, Diez T, El-Anis I (2013) An introduction to International Relations Theory: perspectives and themes. Routledge, London
Stegen K, Kusznir J (2015) Outcomes and strategies in the ‘New Great Game’: China and the Caspian States emerge as winners. J Eurasian Stud 6(2):91–106
Weitz R (2013) Explaining Kazakhstan’s Mediation Mission. Cent Asia-Caucasus Anal 15:9
Winrow G (2006) Possible Consequences of a New Geopolitical Game in Eurasia on Turkey as an Emerging Energy Transport Hub. Turkish Policy Quarterly, 5, 2, available at http://www.esiweb.org/pdf/esi_turkey_tpq_id_62.pdf, accessed 29 November, 2015.
Acknowledgments
This article is based on the research project ELSCID. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 693799.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Collins, N., Bekenova, K. Fuelling the New Great Game: Kazakhstan, energy policy and the EU. Asia Eur J 15, 1–20 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-016-0451-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-016-0451-4