Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The secondary benefits of climate change mitigation: an overlapping generations approach

Computational Management Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We modify a model of climate and economy to address the effects of the reduction in atmospheric pollutants which occurs as a result of climate change mitigation policies. In particular, the reduction of sulphur dioxide (SO2) emissions as a result of climate change policies leads to reduced statistical morbidity and infant mortality, but increased short term climate change. It remains the case, even with the consideration of secondary benefits, that there are welfare costs of GHG emission control to almost all working-age agents alive when the policies are imposed, which suggests that the consideration of secondary benefits alone may not be sufficient to provoke aggressive action on climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amann M, Cofala J, Heyes C, Klimont Z, Schöpp W (1999) The RAINS model: a tool for assessing regional emission control strategies in Europe. Pollut Atmos 4:41–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansuategi A, Escapa M (2002) Economic growth and greenhouse gas emissions. Ecolo Econ 40(1):23–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burtraw D, Krupnick A, Palmer K, Paul A, Toman M, Bloyd C (1999) Ancillary benefits of reduced air pollution in the US from moderate greenhouse gas mitigation policies in the electricity sector. Technical Report 99-51, Resources for the Future, USA

  • Chay KY, Greenstone M (2003) The impact of air pollution on infant mortality: Evidence from geographic variation in pollution shocks induced by a recession. Q J Econ 118(3):1121–1167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond PA (1965) National debt in a neoclassical growth model. Am Econ Rev 55(5):1126–1150

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekins P (1996) How large a carbon tax is justified by the secondary benefits of CO2 abatement. Resour Energy Econ 18(2):161–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekins P, Speck S (1999) Competitiveness and exemptions from environmental taxes in Europe. Environ Resour Econ 13(4):369–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyckmans J, Bertrand C (2000) Integrated assessment of carbon and sulphur emissions, simulations with the CLIMNEG model. ETE Working Paper 2000-08, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium

  • Gerlagh R, Keyzer MA (2001) Sustainability and the intergenerational distribution of natural resource entitlements. J Public Econ 79(2):315–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerlagh R, van der Zwaan B (2001) The effects of ageing and an environmental trust fund in an overlapping generations model on carbon emission reductions. Ecol Econ 36:311–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerlagh R, van der Zwaan B (2003) Gross world product and consumption in a global warming model with endogenous technical change. Resour Energy Econ 25:35–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland M, Berry J, Forster D (1999) Externe, 1999: externalities of energy, vol 7: methodology 1998 Update. Technical report, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg

  • Howarth RB (1998) An overlapping generations model of climate-economy interactions. Scand J Econ 100(3):575–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2000) Special report on emissions scenarios. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2001a) Climate change 2001: mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2001b) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Kavuncu YO, Knabb SD (2005) Stabilizing greenhouse gas emissions: Assessing the intergenerational costs and benefits of the Kyoto Protocol. Energy Econ 27(3):369–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kverndokk S, Rosendahl K (2000) CO2 mitigation costs and ancillary benefits in the Nordic Countries the UK and Ireland: a survey. Technical Report Memorandum 34/2000, Department of Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo

  • Leach A (2006) The welfare implications of climate change policy. Mimeo, November 2006. Revised version available at http://www.bus.ualberta.ca/aleach

  • Manne AS, Mendelsohn R, Richels R (1995) MERGE: a model for evaluating regional and global effects of GHG reduction policies. Energy Policy 23(1):17–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newbery DM (2005) Why tax energy? Towards a more rational policy. Energy J 26(3):1–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus WD, Boyer J (2000) Warming the world. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ono T, Maeda Y (2001) Is aging harmful to the environment?. Environ Resour Econ 20(2):113–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overpeck J, Otto-Bliesner B, Miller G, Muhs D, Alley R, Kiehl J (2006) Paleoclimatic evidence for future ice-sheet instability and rapid sea-level rise. Science 311(5768):1747–1750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rignot E, Kanagaratnam P (2006) Changes in the velocity structure of the Greenland ice sheet. Science 311(5763):986–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz SE (1996) The whitehouse effect—shortwave radiative forcing anthropogenic aerosols: An overview. J Aerosol Sci 27(3):359–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah J, Nagpal T, Johnson T, Amann M, Carmichael G, Foell W, Green C, Hettelingh JP, Hordijk L, Li J, Peng C, Pu Y, Ramankutty R, Streets D (2000) Integrated analysis for acid rain in Asia: Policy implications and results of the RAINS-Asia model. Ann Rev Energy Environ 25(5768):339–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tol R (2002) Estimates of the damage costs of climate change, part II. Dynamic estimates. Environ Resour Econ 21(2):135–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olivier Bahn.

Additional information

Olivier Bahn—Affiliated researcher: GERAD, Bahn acknowledges the support of NSERC. Andrew Leach—Affiliated researcher: CABREE, CIRANO, CIRPEE.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bahn, O., Leach, A. The secondary benefits of climate change mitigation: an overlapping generations approach. CMS 5, 233–257 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10287-007-0048-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10287-007-0048-x

Keywords

JEL classification

Navigation