Septic versus aseptic hip revision: how different?
The few available studies directly comparing aseptic and septic joint revision surgery report conflicting results. We investigated whether two-stage revision of septic hip prosthesis with a preformed antibiotic-loaded spacer and an uncemented prosthesis provides hip function and quality of life similar to those provided by aseptic revision surgery in the medium term, as well as the associated direct hospital costs.
Materials and methods
We prospectively evaluated the hip function (Harris hip score) and quality of life (WOMAC and SF-12 scores) of 80 patients who underwent one-stage revision for aseptic loosening (Group A, 40 patients) or two-stage revision for septic total hip prostheses (Group S, 40 patients). Patients were matched for gender, age, and bone loss. A preformed antibiotic-loaded cement spacer was used for two-stage revision, and uncemented modular prostheses were implanted at revision in both groups. The minimum follow-up was 2 years (average 4 years; range 2–6 years).
We found no difference in infection recurrence or aseptic loosening rate in the two groups. Average Harris hip score increased similarly in both groups: from 19.1 to 74.0 in Group A versus 15.0–71.2 in Group S. Patient-reported quality-of-life questionnaires (SF-12 and WOMAC) at last follow-up were similar postoperatively, but the complication rate for Group S was twice that of Group A (20.8 versus 10%). Mean overall hospital-related costs of two-stage procedures were 2.2 times greater than those for aseptic revisions.
Two-stage revision for infected hip prostheses, using a preformed antibiotic-loaded cement spacer and uncemented revision prosthesis, offers a success rate comparable to noninfected revisions in the medium term but is associated with a higher complication rate and costs.
- Apolone G, Mosconi P Quattrociocchi L, Granicolo EA, Groth NJE (2009) SF-12 health status questionnaire (Italian version). http://crc.marionegri.it/qdv/downloads/SF12%20Manuale.pdf. Accessed 12 Dec 2009
- Athanasou, NA, Pandey, R, Steiger, R, McLardy Smith, P (1997) The role of intraoperative frozen sections in revision total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79: pp. 1433-1434
- Barrack, RL (2002) Rush pin technique for temporary antibiotic-impregnated cement prosthesis for infected total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17: pp. 600-603 CrossRef
- Barrack, RL, Engh, G, Rorabeck, C, Sawhney, J, Woolfrey, M (2000) Patient satisfaction and outcome after septic versus aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 15: pp. 990-993 CrossRef
- Bozic, KJ, Kurtz, SM, Lau, E, Ong, K, Vail, TP, Berry, DJ (2009) The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91: pp. 128-133 CrossRef
- Bozic, KJ, Ries, MD (2005) The impact of infection after total hip arthroplasty on hospital and surgeon resource utilization. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87: pp. 1746-1751 CrossRef
- Cierny, G, Pennick, JJ, Mader, JT (2003) A clinical staging system for adult osteomyelitis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 414: pp. 7-24 CrossRef
- Della Valle, CJ, Paprosky, WG (2003) Classification and an algorithmic approach to the reconstruction of femoral deficiency in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85: pp. 1-6
- Duncan, CP, Masri, BA (1995) The role of antibiotic-loaded cement in the treatment of an infection after a hip replacement. Instr Course Lect 44: pp. 305-313
- Durbhakula, SM, Czajka, J, Fuchs, MD, Uhl, RL (2004) Spacer endoprosthesis for the treatment of infected total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19: pp. 760-767 CrossRef
- Eisler, T, Svensson, O, Tengström, A, Elmstedt, E (2002) Patient expectation and satisfaction in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17: pp. 457-462 CrossRef
- Espehaug, B, Havelin, LI, Engesaeter, LB, Langeland, N, Vollset, SE (1998) Patient satisfaction and function after primary and revision total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 351: pp. 135-148 CrossRef
- Etienne, G, Waldman, B, Rajadhyaksha, AD, Ragland, PS, Mont, MA (2003) Use of a functional temporary prosthesis in a two-stage approach to infection at the site of a total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85: pp. 94-96
- Feldman, DS, Lonner, JH, Desai, P, Zuckerman, JD (1995) The role of intraoperative frozen sections in revision total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77: pp. 1807-1813
- Greidanus, NV, Masri, BA, Garbuz, DS, Wilson, SD, McAlinden, MG, Xu, M, Duncan, CP (2007) Use of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein level to diagnose infection before revision total knee arthroplasty a prospective evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89: pp. 1409-1416 CrossRef
- Hebert, CK, Williams, RE, Levy, RS, Barrack, RL (1996) Cost of treating an infected total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 331: pp. 140-145 CrossRef
- Hsieh, PH, Chen, LH, Chen, CH, Lee, MS, Yang, WE, Shih, CH (2004) Two-stage revision hip arthroplasty for infection with a custom-made, antibiotic-loaded, cement prosthesis as an interim spacer. J Trauma 56: pp. 1247-1252 CrossRef
- Klassbo, M, Larsson, E, Mannevik, E (2003) Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score. An extension of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. Scand J Rheumatol 32: pp. 46-51 CrossRef
- Lonner, JH, Desai, P, Dicesare, PE, Steiner, G, Zuckerman, JD (1996) The reliability of analysis of intraoperative frozen sections for identifying active infection during revision hip or knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 78A: pp. 1553-1558
- Magnan, B, Regis, D, Biscaglia, R, Bartolozzi, P (2001) Preformed acrylic bone cement spacer loaded with antibiotics: use of two-stage procedure in 10 patients because of infected hips after total replacement. Acta Orthop Scand 72: pp. 591-594 CrossRef
- Martin, DP, Engelberg, R, Agel, J, Swiontkowski, MF (1997) Comparison of the musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire with the Short Form-36, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index, and the sickness impact profile health-status measures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79: pp. 1323-1325
- McGrory, BJ, Harris, WH (1996) Can the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index be used to evaluate different hip joints in the same patients?. J Arthroplasty 11: pp. 841 CrossRef
- Meani E, Romanò CL, Crosby L, Hofmann G (2007) Infection and local treatment in orthopaedic infections. Springer, Heidelberg
- Meek, RM, Dunlop, D, Garbuz, DS, McGraw, R, Greidanus, NV, Masri, BA (2004) Patient satisfaction and functional status after aseptic versus septic revision total knee arthroplasty using the PROSTALAC articulating spacer. J Arthroplasty 19: pp. 874-879 CrossRef
- Patil, S, Garbuz, DS, Greidanus, NV, Masri, BA, Duncan, CP (2008) Quality of life outcomes in revision vs primary total hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. J Arthroplasty 23: pp. 550-553 CrossRef
- Patil S, Lee K, Huddleston JI, Harris AH, Goodman SB (2010) Aseptic versus septic revision total knee arthroplasty: patient satisfaction, outcome and quality of life improvement. Knee 17:200–203
- Pearle, AD, Sculco, TP (2002) Technique for fabrication of an antibiotic-loaded cement hemiarthroplasty (ANTILOCH) prosthesis for infected total hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop 31: pp. 425-427
- Ries, MD, Jergesen, H (1999) An inexpensive molding method for antibiotic impregnated cement spacers in infected total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 14: pp. 764-765 CrossRef
- Robinson, AH, Palmer, CR, Villar, RN (1999) Is revision as good as primary hip replacement? A comparison of quality of life. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81: pp. 42 CrossRef
- Romano, CL, Duci, D, Romano, D, Mazza, M, Meani, E (2004) Celecoxib versus indomethacin in the prevention of heterotopic ossification after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19: pp. 14 CrossRef
- Schoellner, C, Fuerderer, S, Rompe, JD, Eckardt, A (2003) Individual bone cement spacers (IBCS) for septic hip revision—preliminary report. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 123: pp. 254-259
- Sculco, TP (1993) The economic impact of infected total joint arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 42: pp. 349-351
- Wang, CJ, Hsieh, MC, Huang, TW, Wang, JW, Chen, HS, Liu, CY (2004) Clinical outcome and patient satisfaction in aseptic and septic revision total knee arthroplasty. Knee 11: pp. 45-49 CrossRef
- Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1996) A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 34:0–233
- Yamamoto, K, Miyagawa, N, Masaoka, T, Katori, Y, Shishido, T, Imakiire, A (2003) Clinical effectiveness of antibiotic-impregnated cement spacers for the treatment of infected implants of the hip joint. J Orthop Sci 8: pp. 823-828 CrossRef
- Younger, AS, Duncan, CP, Masri, BA, McGraw, RW (1997) The outcome of two-stage arthroplasty using a custom-made interval spacer to treat the infected hip. J Arthroplasty 12: pp. 615-623 CrossRef
- Septic versus aseptic hip revision: how different?
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Volume 11, Issue 3 , pp 167-174
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Milan
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Dipartimento di Chirurgia Ricostruttiva e delle Infezioni Osteo-articolari, Istituto Ortopedico IRCCS Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi, 4-20166, Milan, Italy
- 2. Centro di Chirurgia Osteo-articolare Settica, Istituto Ortopedico Gaetano Pini, Milan, Italy