Reliability of ACR criteria over time to differentiate classic fibromyalgia from nonspecific widespread pain syndrome: a 6-month prospective cohort study
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1990 criteria, initially introduced to classify fibromyalgia (FM) syndrome, has gained popularity in research and clinical grounds for diagnostic purposes. The objectives of this study were designed to assess the consistency of ACR criteria against the time in classifying FM. This was a prospective cohort study performed in a multidisciplinary pain clinic from October 2002 to June 2005. Patients who were clinically suspected of having FM and had a normal screening laboratory evaluation were scheduled for dolorimetry. Those found to have 6 or more tender points were considered eligible and labeled as either classic or atypical FM if they did or did not, respectively, fulfil ACR criteria. The 2 groups were assessed using the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) and compared using baseline characteristics. We reassessed dolorimetric exam and FIQ 6 months later. Of 91 patients who participated in this study, 70 completed the follow-up. Of them, 34 (49%) patients were identified as atypical, and 36 (51%) were labeled as classic FM. At first visit, the classic FM group had higher scores on sleep quality, stiffness, anxiety, depression, and total FIQ score (p < 0.05) but not for other variables. At 6 months, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in all measured variables. Labeling shift from classic to atypical FM and vice versa occurred at a rate of 36.1 and 32.4%, respectively. This study showed the ACR 1990 criteria was not able to consistently classify affected patients with FM syndrome within a group of patients having nonspecific body pain and multiple tender points over 6 months of follow-up.
- Wolfe F, Smythe HA, Yunus MB, et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification fibromyalgia. Report of Multicenter Criteria Committee. Arthritis Rheum. 1990;33:160–72. CrossRef
- Wolfe F. The relation between tender points and fibromyalgia symptom variables: evidence that fibromyalgia is not a discrete disorder in the clinic. Ann Rheum Dis. 1997;56:268–71. CrossRef
- Croft P, Burt J, Schollum J, Thomas E, Macfarlane G, Silman A. More pain, more tender points: is fibromyalgia just one end of a continuous spectrum? Ann Rheum Dis. 1996;55:482–5. CrossRef
- Croft P, Schollum J, Silman A. Population study of tender point counts and pain as evidence of fibromyalgia. BMJ. 1994;309:696–9.
- Wolfe F, Ross K, Anderson J, Russell IJ, Hebert L. The prevalence and characteristics of fibromyalgia in the general population. Arthritis Rheum. 1995;38:19–28. CrossRef
- Wessely S, Hotopf M. Is fibromyalgia a distinct clinical entity? Historical and epidemiological evidence. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 1999;13:427–36. CrossRef
- Wolfe F. Diagnosis of fibromyalgia: the new criteria. J Musculoskelet Med. 1990;7:53–69.
- Goldenberg DL. Fibromyalgia syndrome a decade later: what have we learned? Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:777–85. CrossRef
- Clauw DJ, Crofford LJ. Chronic widespread pain and fibromyalgia: what we know, and what we need to know. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2003;17:685–701. CrossRef
- Schochat T, Croft P, Raspe H. The epidemiology of fibromyalgia. Workshop of the Standing Committee on Epidemiology, European League against Rheumatism (EULAR), Bad Sackingen, 19–21 November 1992. Br J Rheumatol. 1994;33:783–6. CrossRef
- Katz RS, Wolfe F, Michaud K. Fibromyalgia diagnosis: a comparison of clinical, survey, and American College of Rheumatology criteria. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:169–76. CrossRef
- Smythe HA, Gladman A, Dagenias P, Kraishi M, Blake R. Relation between fibrositic and control site tenderness; effects of dolorimeter scale length and footplate size. J Rheumaol. 1992;19:284–9.
- Okifuji A, Turk DC, Sinclair JD, Starz TW, Marcus DA. A standardized manual tender point survey. I. Development and determination of a threshold point for the identification of positive tender points in fibromyalgia syndrome. J Rheumatol. 1997;24:377–83.
- Burckhardt CS, Clark SR, Bennet RM. The fibromyalgia impact questionnaire: development and validation. J Rheumatol. 1991;18:728–33.
- Worrel LM, Krahn LE, Sletten CD, Pond GR. Treating fibromyalgia with a brief interdisciplinary program: initial outcomes and predictors of response. Mayo Clin Proc. 2001;76:384–90. CrossRef
- White KP, Harth M. An analytical review of 24 controlled clinical trials for fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS). Pain. 1996;64:211–9. CrossRef
- Harth M, Nielson WR. The fibromyalgia tender points: use them or lose them? A brief review of the controversy. J Rheumatol. 2007;34:914–22.
- Wolfe F. Stop using the American College of Rheumatology criteria in the clinic. J Rheumatol. 2003;30:1671–2.
- Reliability of ACR criteria over time to differentiate classic fibromyalgia from nonspecific widespread pain syndrome: a 6-month prospective cohort study
Volume 19, Issue 6 , pp 663-669
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Japan
- Additional Links
- Cohort studies
- Pain syndromes
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Rheumatology, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Hazarat-e-Rasoul Akram Medical Complex, Niyayesh Street, Sattarkhan Ave., Tehran, Iran
- 2. Department of Rheumatology, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Guilan, Iran
- 3. Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran