Skip to main content
Log in

Postoperative bladder and sexual function in patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open resection of rectal cancer

Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There have been conflicting opinions regarding the superiority of open and laparoscopic surgery in preserving bladder and sexual function after rectal cancer surgery. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to pool the available data comparing the impact of surgical approaches on postoperative sexual and urinary function. A search of Pubmed, Medline, Cochrane and Embase was undertaken and studies from January 2000 to February 2013 were identified. We included, in our meta-analysis, both prospective and retrospective studies that compared laparoscopic surgery and open surgery for rectal cancer. A total of 876 patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery (lap n = 468, open n = 408) were examined. In men, postoperative ejaculatory function and erectile dysfunction evaluated from two studies comprising of 74 patients showed no difference between groups. The rate of overall sexual dysfunction evaluated from five studies comprising of 289 patients revealed a rate of 34 % in both the open and lap groups. Postoperative urinary function evaluated from five studies comprising of 312 patients showed no difference between groups. In women, postoperative sexual and urinary function were evaluated from five studies comprising of 321 patients. Three studies (n = 219) reported no difference in sexual function between groups. Postoperative urinary function evaluated from four studies comprising of 212 patients was found to be comparable. The available data are limited, but suggest that neither form of surgical approach be it laparoscopy or open surgery demonstrate superiority in preservation of sexual and bladder function. Further research into the technical aspects of surgery and evaluating newer minimally invasive technologies such as the robot may prove to be useful in improving functional outcomes of rectal cancer patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ho VP, Lee Y, Stein SL, Temple LK (2011) Sexual function after treatment for rectal cancer: a review. Dis Colon Rectum 54:113–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lindsey I, Guy RJ, Warren BF, Mortensen NJ (2000) Anatomy of Denonvilliers’ fascia and pelvic nerves, impotence, and implications for the colorectal surgeon. Br J Surg 87:1288–1299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lindsey I, Mortensen NJ (2002) Iatrogenic impotence and rectal dissection. Br J Surg 89:1493–1494

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schmidt CE, Bestmann B, Kuchler T, Kremer B (2005) Factors influencing sexual function in patients with rectal cancer. International journal of impotence research. Int J Impot Res 17:231–238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Engel J, Kerr J, Schlesinger-Raab A, Eckel R, Sauer H, Holzel D (2003) Quality of life in rectal cancer patients: a four-year prospective study. Ann Surg 238:203–213

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Traa MJ, De Vries J, Roukema JA, Den Oudsten BL (2012) Sexual (dys)function and the quality of sexual life in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review. Ann Oncol 23:19–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang L, Yu YY, Zhou ZG et al (2007) Quality of life outcomes following laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancers: a clinical control study. Eur J Surg Oncol 33:575–579

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jayne DG, Brown JM, Thorpe H, Walker J, Quirke P, Guillou PJ (2005) Bladder and sexual function following resection for rectal cancer in a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open technique. Br J Surg 92:1124–1132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ (2010) Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 97:1638–1645

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Quah HM, Jayne DG, Eu KW, Seow-Choen F (2002) Bladder and sexual dysfunction following laparoscopically assisted and conventional open mesorectal resection for cancer. Br J Surg 89:1551–1556

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Asoglu O, Matlim T, Karanlik H, Atar M, Muslumanoglu M, Kapran Y, Igci A, Ozmen V, Kecer M, Parlak M (2009) Impact of laparoscopic surgery on bladder and sexual function after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 23(2):296–303. doi:10.1007/s00464-008-9870-7

  12. McGlone ER, Khan O, Flashman K, Khan J, Parvaiz A (2012) Urogenital function following laparoscopic and open rectal cancer resection: a comparative study. Sur Endosc 26:2559–2565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. McGlone ER, Khan OA, Conti J, Iqbal Z, Parvaiz A (2012) Functional outcomes following laparoscopic and open rectal resection for cancer. Int J Surg 10:305–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Der Simonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Stamopoulos P, Theodoropoulos GE, Papailiou J et al (2009) Prospective evaluation of sexual function after open and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 23:2665–2674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nitori N, Hasegawa H, Ishii Y, Endo T, Kitajima M, Kitagawa Y (2008) Sexual function in men with rectal and rectosigmoid cancer after laparoscopic and open surgery. Hepatogastroenterology 55:1304–1307

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J et al (2000) The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Med 26:191–208

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kang S-B, Park JW, Jeong S-Y et al (2010) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 11:637–645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. WHO Expert Consultation (2004) Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet 363:157–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. C. Chua.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lim, R.S., Yang, T.X. & Chua, T.C. Postoperative bladder and sexual function in patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open resection of rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 18, 993–1002 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-014-1189-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-014-1189-x

Keywords

Navigation