Lengthening of the colon for low rectal anastomosis in a cadaveric study: how much can we gain?
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Lengthening of the colon for tension-free low rectal anastomosis comprises ligation of the inferior mesenteric vessels and splenic flexure mobilization. The aim of our study was to evaluate the length gained after each level of mesenteric vessel ligation with or without splenic flexure mobilization.
The length of the colon after each mobilization technique, that is, low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA), high ligation of IMA, high ligation of the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV), and mobilization of splenic flexure, was measured in 13 cadaveric specimens. After each step, the colon and vessels were placed back in their original position.
The distance from the colosigmoid junction (CSJ) to the pubic symphysis (PS) was measured after each mobilization technique. The average elongation of the colon from original CSJ–PS distance to the CSJ–PS distance after low ligation of IMA, high ligation of IMA, high ligation of IMA plus splenic flexure mobilization, and high ligation of IMV was 2.08 ± 4.39 cm, 5.02 ± 5.51 cm, 8.20 ± 5.95 cm, and 17.98 ± 6.80 cm, respectively. The length of colon gained after IMV ligation was greater than the length obtained after low ligation of IMA, high ligation of IMA, and high ligation of IMA plus splenic flexure mobilization (p < 0.0001).
This study shows the objective length gained following each standard surgical technique in colonic mobilization for low rectal anastomosis. The maximum length gained is after high ligation of IMV.
- Ferlay J, Parkin DM, Steliarova-Foucher E (2010) Estimate of cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2008. Eur J Cancer 46:765–781 CrossRef
- Rafferty JF (2001) Obtaining adequate bowel length for colorectal anastomosis. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 14:25–31 CrossRef
- Buunen M, Lange MM, Ditzel M, Kleinrensink GJ, van de Velde CJ, Lange JF (2009) Level of arterial ligation in total mesorectal excision (TME): an anatomical study. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:1317–1320 CrossRef
- Eaton MA, Valentine J, Jackson MR, Modrall G, Clagett P (2000) Incidental splenic injury during abdominal vascular surgery: a case-controlled analysis. J Am CollSurg 190:58–64 CrossRef
- Holubar SD, Wang JK, Wolff BG et al (2009) Splenic salvage after intraoperative splenic injury during colectomy. Arch Surg 144:1040–1045 CrossRef
- Katory M, Tang CL, Koh WL et al (2008) A 6-year review of surgical morbidity and oncological outcome after high anterior resection for colorectal malignancy with and without splenic flexure mobilization. Colorectal Dis 10:165–169
- Brennan DJ, Moynagh M, Brannigan AE, Gleeson F, Rowland M, O’Connell PR (2007) Routine mobilization of the splenic flexure is not necessary during anterior resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 50:302–307 CrossRef
- Kim J, Choi DJ, Kim SH (2009) Laparoscopic rectal resection without splenic flexure mobilization: a prospective study assessing anastomotic safety. Hepatogastroenterology 56:1354–1358
- Titu LV, Tweedle E, Rooney PS (2008) High tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in curative surgery for left colonic and rectal cancers: a systematic review. Dig Surg 25:148–157 CrossRef
- Lengthening of the colon for low rectal anastomosis in a cadaveric study: how much can we gain?
Techniques in Coloproctology
Volume 17, Issue 4 , pp 377-381
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Milan
- Additional Links
- Low anterior resection
- Tension-free anastomosis
- Inferior mesenteric vein ligation
- Inferior mesenteric artery ligation
- Splenic flexure mobilization
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand
- 2. Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- 3. Department of Surgery, Selayang Hospital, Selayang, Malaysia