Date: 14 Nov 2012
Obstructive defecation syndrome: 19 years of experience with laparoscopic resection rectopexy
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
In obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS) combinations of morphologic alterations of the pelvic floor and the colorectum are nearly always evident. Laparoscopic resection rectopexy (LRR) aims at restoring physiological function. We present the results of 19 years of experience with this procedure in patients with ODS.
Between 1993 and 2012, 264 patients underwent LRR for ODS at our department. Perioperative and follow-up data were analyzed.
The female/male ratio was 25.4:1, mean age was 61.3 years (±14.3 years), and mean body mass index (BMI) was 25.2 kg/m2 (±4.2 kg/m2). The pathological conditions most frequently found in combination were a sigmoidocele plus a rectocele (n = 79) and a sigmoidocele plus a rectal prolapse or intussusception (n = 69). The conversion rate was 2.3 % (n = 6). The mortality rate was 0.75 % (n = 2), the rate of complications requiring surgical re-intervention was 4.3 % (n = 11), and the rate of minor complications was 19.8 % (n = 51). Follow-up data were available for 161 patients with a mean follow-up of 58.2 months (±47.1 months). Long-term results showed that 79.5 % of patients (n = 128) reported at least an improvement of symptoms. In cases of a sigmoidocele (n = 63 available for follow-up) or a rectal prolapse II°/III° (n = 72 available for follow-up), the improvement rates were 79.4 % (n = 50) and 81.9 % (n = 59), respectively.
LRR is a safe and effective procedure. Our perioperative results and long-term functional outcome strengthen the evidence regarding benefits of LRR in patients with an outlet obstruction. However, careful patient selection is essential.
Ommer A, Rolfs T, Walz MK (2010) Chirurgische Therapieoptionen bie Stuhlentleerungsstörungen. CHAZ 11:393–404
Lehur PA, Stuto A, Fantoli M et al (2008) Outcomes of stapled transanal rectal resection vs. biofeedback for the treatment of outlet obstruction associated with rectal intussusception and rectocele: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 5:1611–1618CrossRef
Tou S, Brown SR, Malik AI, Nelson RL (2008) Surgery for complete rectal prolapse in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD001758. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001758.pub2
Laubert T, Bader FG, Kleemann M et al. (2012) Outcome analysis of elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Int J Colorectal Dis. doi:10.1007/s00384-011-1395-1
Johnson E, Stangeland A, Johannessen HO, Carlsen E (2007) Resection rectopexy for external rectal prolapse reduces constipation and anal incontinence. Scand J Surg 96:56–61PubMed
von Papen M, Ashari LH, Lumley JW, Stevenson AR, Stitz RW (2007) Functional results of laparoscopic resection rectopexy for symptomatic rectal intussusception. Dis Colon Rectum 50:50–55CrossRef
Schwandner O, Farke S, Fischer F, Schiedeck TH, Bruch HP (2004) Chirurgische Therapie der Outlet-Obstrudkion bei Sigmoidozelen - Ist die lapaorskopische Operation sicher und komplikationsarm? Coloproctology 26:75–84CrossRef
Gemsenjager E (1996) Internal rectal prolapse: therapy outcome and current status. Schweiz Med Wochenschr German 126:1377–1384
- Obstructive defecation syndrome: 19 years of experience with laparoscopic resection rectopexy
Techniques in Coloproctology
Volume 17, Issue 3 , pp 307-314
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Milan
- Additional Links
- Outlet obstruction
- Laparoscopic resection rectopexy
- Chronic constipation
- Long-term outcome
- Rectal prolapse
- Industry Sectors