Neurosurgical Review

, Volume 35, Issue 4, pp 477–484

Role of lumbar interspinous distraction on the neural elements

  • Alex Alfieri
  • Roberto Gazzeri
  • Julian Prell
  • Christian Scheller
  • Jens Rachinger
  • Christian Strauss
  • Andreas Schwarz
Review

DOI: 10.1007/s10143-012-0394-1

Cite this article as:
Alfieri, A., Gazzeri, R., Prell, J. et al. Neurosurg Rev (2012) 35: 477. doi:10.1007/s10143-012-0394-1

Abstract

The interspinous distraction devices are used to treat variable pathologies ranging from facet syndrome, diskogenic low back pain, degenerative spinal stenosis, diskopathy, spondylolisthesis, and instability. The insertion of a posterior element with an interspinous device (ISD) is commonly judged responsive to a relative kyphosis of a lumbar segment with a moderate but persistent increase of the spinal canal and of the foraminal width and area, and without influence on low-grade spondylolisthesis. The consequence is the need of shared specific biomechanical concepts to give for each degenerative problem the right indication through a critical analysis of all available experimental and clinical biomechanical data. We reviewed systematically the available clinical and experimental data about kyphosis, enlargement of the spinal canal, distraction of the interspinous distance, increase of the neural foramina, ligamentous structures, load of the posterior annulus, intradiskal pressure, strength of the spinous processes, degeneration of the adjacent segment, complications, and cost-effectiveness of the ISD. The existing literature does not provide actual scientific evidence over the superiority of the ISD strategy, but most of the experimental and clinical data show a challenging potential. These considerations are applicable with different types of ISD with only few differences between the different categories. Despite—or because of—the low invasiveness of the surgical implantation of the ISD, this technique promises to play a major role in the future degenerative lumbar microsurgery. The main indications for ISD remain lumbar spinal stenoses and painful facet arthroses. A clear documented contraindication is the presence of an anterolisthesis. Nevertheless, the existing literature does not provide evidence of superiority of outcome and cost-effectiveness of the ISD strategy over laminectomy or other surgical procedures. At this time, the devices should be used in clinical randomized independent trials in order to obtain more information concerning the most advantageous optimal indication or, in selected cases, to treat tailored indications.

Keywords

Interspinous devicesDegenerative lumbar spineBiomechanics of instability

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alex Alfieri
    • 1
  • Roberto Gazzeri
    • 3
  • Julian Prell
    • 1
  • Christian Scheller
    • 1
  • Jens Rachinger
    • 1
  • Christian Strauss
    • 1
  • Andreas Schwarz
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryMartin Luther University Halle-WittenbergHalle (Saale)Germany
  2. 2.NeurosurgeryCentral General HospitalBozenItaly
  3. 3.NeurosurgerySan Giovanni Addolorata HospitalRomeItaly