Regional Environmental Change

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 579–592

Adaptive capacity determinants in developed states: examples from the Nordic countries and Russia

  • E. Carina H. Keskitalo
  • Halvor Dannevig
  • Grete K. Hovelsrud
  • Jennifer J. West
  • Åsa Gerger Swartling
Original Article

DOI: 10.1007/s10113-010-0182-9

Cite this article as:
Keskitalo, E.C.H., Dannevig, H., Hovelsrud, G.K. et al. Reg Environ Change (2011) 11: 579. doi:10.1007/s10113-010-0182-9

Abstract

Adaptive capacity in a community context has so far mainly been studied in developing countries as well as indigenous communities in the industrialised world. This article adds to that literature through reviewing studies undertaken in the Nordic countries and Russia, highlighting the ways in which general determinants of adaptive capacity play out in Northern, industrialised contexts. The paper illustrates that the determinants of adaptive capacity in industrialised states exhibit systematic differences from mixed subsistence-cash based communities such as those found in Arctic Canada. We discuss in particular the importance of economic resources in a market-based system, technological competition, and infrastructure, in determining adaptive capacity of natural resource-dependent communities in the Nordic countries and Russia. The paper also illustrates differences in adaptive capacity within the case study region, including between peripheral and central locations with regard to economic resources and diversification possibilities, and between Nordic and Russian cases with regard to infrastructure and technology access. The findings indicate that understanding of determinants of adaptive capacity in resource-dependent communities would benefit from both further contextualisation and broad comparison, across different types of political and administrative systems.

Keywords

Adaptive capacity Adaptation Community vulnerability Nordic countries Norway Sweden Finland Russia 

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Carina H. Keskitalo
    • 1
  • Halvor Dannevig
    • 2
  • Grete K. Hovelsrud
    • 2
  • Jennifer J. West
    • 2
  • Åsa Gerger Swartling
    • 3
  1. 1.Political Science, Department of Social and Economic GeographyUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden
  2. 2.CICERO Center for International Climate and Environmental ResearchGaustadalleen 21OsloNorway
  3. 3.Stockholm Environment Institute and Stockholm Resilience CentreKräftriket 2 BStockholmSweden