Regional Environmental Change

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 157–168

Understanding vulnerability in southern Africa: comparative findings using a multiple-stressor approach in South Africa and Malawi

  • Marisa Casale
  • Scott Drimie
  • Timothy Quinlan
  • Gina Ziervogel
Original Article

DOI: 10.1007/s10113-009-0103-y

Cite this article as:
Casale, M., Drimie, S., Quinlan, T. et al. Reg Environ Change (2010) 10: 157. doi:10.1007/s10113-009-0103-y

Abstract

Within southern Africa, many households are facing increasing pressures as they deal with multiple challenges such as low employment, high levels of disease, environmental resources under pressure and changing political landscapes. To respond to the needs of different individuals and households, it is important to define the nature of their vulnerability. An increasing amount of theoretical and empirical work on the concept of ‘vulnerability’ has led to a range of definitions, indicators and measurement tools, which have come to characterise this field of study. As a result, there is no one general consensus. This paper presents the results from the latest in a series of applied studies conducted since 2004 by a network of scientists working in southern Africa, aimed at refining the definition and application of the concept of vulnerability. The study employed a recently developed multiple-stressor model to guide the collection and analysis of data from three sites in South Africa and Malawi. In this paper, we identify and explore five key ‘symptoms’ of vulnerability emerging from our multi-country data and reflect on the usefulness of the model employed.

Keywords

VulnerabilitySouthern AfricaMultiple stressorsSAVI model

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marisa Casale
    • 1
  • Scott Drimie
    • 2
    • 3
  • Timothy Quinlan
    • 1
  • Gina Ziervogel
    • 4
  1. 1.HEARDUniversity of Kwazulu-NatalKwazulu-NatalSouth Africa
  2. 2.Poverty, Health and Nutrition DivisionInternational Food Policy Research InstituteWashington, DCUSA
  3. 3.Regional Network on AIDS, Livelihoods and Food SecurityJohannesburgSouth Africa
  4. 4.Department of Environmental and Geographical ScienceUniversity of Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa