The neighborhood effects of foreclosure Authors
First Online: 08 May 2009 Received: 13 March 2008 Accepted: 17 April 2009 DOI:
Cite this article as: Leonard, T. & Murdoch, J.C. J Geogr Syst (2009) 11: 317. doi:10.1007/s10109-009-0088-6 Abstract
Neighborhood quality is an important attribute of housing yet its value is rarely known to researchers. We argue that changes in nearby foreclosures reveal changes in neighborhood quality. Thus estimates of the hedonic price of nearby foreclosures provide a glimpse of values that people hold for local neighborhood quality. The empirical models include controls for both spatial dependence in housing prices and in the errors. The estimates indicate that nearby foreclosures produce externalities that are capitalized into home prices—an additional foreclosure within 250 feet of a sale negatively impacts selling price by approximately $1,666,
ceteris paribus. Keywords Hedonic model Foreclosures Spatial dependence Local public goods Property values References
Ambrose BW, Capone CA (2000) The hazard rates of first and second defaults. J Real Estate Finance Econ 20(3):275–293
Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Anselin L, Florax R (1995) New directions in spatial econometrics. Springer, London
Can A (1992) Specification and estimation of hedonic housing price models. Reg Sci Urban Econ 22:453–474
Capone CA (2001) Introduction to the special issue on mortgage modeling. J Real Estate Finance Econ 23(2):131–137
Cotterman RF (2001) Neighborhood effects in mortgage default risk. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
. Accessed 16 Aug 2007
Dubin R (1992) Spatial autocorrelation and neighborhood quality. Reg Sci Urban Econ 22:433–452
Edelberg W (2003) Risk-based pricing of interest rates in household loan markets. Federal Reserve Board Finance and Economics Discussion Series No. 2003-62
Fernald M (2008) The state of the nation’s housing, 2007. Joint Center for Housing Studies, Cambridge
Gaines JP (2007) Preserving homeownership: addressing the foreclosure issue. Presentation given at the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Preserving Homeownership conference on 12 June 2007
Immergluck D, Smith G (2005) There goes the neighborhood: the effect of single-family mortgage foreclosures on property values. Woodstock Institute.
. Accessed 6 Sept 2007
Kau JB, Keenan DC (1995) An overview of the option-theoretic pricing of mortgages. J Hous Res 6(2):217–243
Kelejian HH, Prucha IR (1998) A generalized spatial two-stage least squares procedure for estimating a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances. J Real Estate Finance Econ 17:99–121
Kelejian HH, Prucha IR (2006) Specification and estimation of spatial autoregressive models with autoregressive and heteroskedastic disturbances.
. Accessed 2 Jan 2009
Kim CW, Phipps TT, Anselin L (2003) Measuring the benefits of air quality improvement: a spatial hedonic approach. J Environ Econ Manag 45:24–39
Lin Z, Rosenblatt E, Yao VW (2009) Spillover effects of foreclosures on neighborhood property values. J Real Estate Finance Econ 34(4):387–407
Páez A, Long F, Farber S (2008) Moving average approaches for hedonic price estimation. Urban Stud 45(8):1565–1581
Rosen S (1974) Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in perfect competition. J Political Econ 72:34–55
United States Foreclosure Law (2007) Texas foreclosure law summary.
. Accessed 20 Oct 2007
US Census Bureau (2007) Housing vacancy survey.
. Accessed 2 Aug 2007