Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Discrimination of painting style and quality: pigeons use different strategies for different tasks

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Birds have visual cognition as well developed as humans. Sometimes, the birds show visual discrimination similar to humans, but the birds may use different cues. Previous reports suggest that global configuration cues are salient for humans, whereas local elemental cues are salient for pigeons. I analyzed the discriminative behavior of pigeons with scrambled images because scrambled images keep the local elemental cues of the original images but lose the global configuration cues. If pigeons use local elemental cues, then, they should show transfer of discrimination from the original images to their scrambled images and also transfer from the scrambled images to their original images. In Experiment I, I trained pigeons on painting style discrimination (Japanese paintings vs. Western impressionist paintings) using either the original or scrambled images and found that the pigeons showed bidirectional transfer. In Experiment II, I trained pigeons on discrimination of “good” versus “bad” paintings using children’s paintings. The birds showed poor transfer from the original images to their scrambled images and vise versa. Thus, the pigeons discriminated good and bad paintings based mostly on global configuration cues in this case. These results suggest that the pigeons use different cues for different discriminations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson JR, Kuwaharam H, Kuroshimma H, Leighty KA, Fujita K (2005) Are monkeys aesthetists? Rensch (1957) revisited. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Proc 31:71–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aust U, Huber L (2001) The role of item- and category specific information in the discrimination of people versus nonpeople images by pigeons. Anim Learn Behav 29:107–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Averbeck BB, Lee D (2004) Coding and transmission of information by neural ensembles. Trends Neurosci 27:225–230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bichot NP, Rossi AF, Desimone R (2005) Parallel and serial neural mechanisms for visual search in macaque area V4. Science 308:529–534

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cavoto KK, Cook RG (2001) Cognitive precedence for local information in hierarchical stimulus processing by pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Proc 27:3–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cela-Conde CJ, Marty G, Maestu F, Ortiz T, Munar E, Fernandez A, Roca M, Rossello J, Quesney F (2004) Sex-related similarities and differences in the neural correlates of beauty. PNAS 101:6321–6325

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerella J (1980) The pigeon’s analysis of picture. Pattern Recognit 12:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delius JD, Habers G (1978) Symmetry: can pigeons conceptualize it? Behav Neural Biol 22:336–342

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Draganiou TI, Nagle L, Kreutzer M (2002) Directional female preference for an exaggerated male trait in canary (Serinus canaria) song. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:2525–2531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll C (2006) The bowerbirds and the bees: miller on art, altruism, and sexual selection. Philos Psychol 19:507–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eibl-Eibesfeldt I (1988) The biological foundation of aesthetics. In: Rentschler I, Herzberger B, Epstein D (eds) Beauty and the brain—biological aspects of aesthetics. Birkhauser, Basel, pp 29–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson BM, Wasserman EA, Gosselin F, Schyns PG (2005) Applying bubbles to localize features that control pigeons’ visual discrimination behavior. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Proc 31:376–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosselin F, Schyns PG (2001) Bubbles: a technique to reveal the use of information in recognition task. Vis Res 41:2261–2271

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greene SL (1983) Feature memorization in pigeon concept formation. In: Commons ML, Herrnstein RJ, Wagner AR (eds) Quantitative analysis of behavior: discriminative processes. Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, pp 209–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Gucwa D, Ehmann J (1985) To whom it may concern: an investigation of the art of elephants. W.W. Norton & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein RJ, Loveland DH (1964) Complex visual concept in the pigeon. Science 146:549–551

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes JM, Graham DJ, Rockmore DN (2010) Quantification of artistic style through sparse coding analysis in the drawings of Pieter Brugel the Elder. PNAS 107:1279–1283

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey NK (1972) ‘Interest’ and ‘pleasure’: two determinants of monkey’s visual preference. Perception 1:395–416

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey NK (1974) Species and individuals in the perceptual world of monkeys. Perception 3:105–114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson CH, Hendriks E, Berezhnoy IJ, Brevdo E, Hughes SM, Daubechies I, Li J, Postma W, Wang JZ (2008) Image processing for artist identification. IEEE Signal Proc Mag 25:37–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawabata H, Zeki S (2004) Neural correlates of beauty. J Neurophysiol 91:1699–1705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick-Steger K, Wasserman EA, Biederman I (1996) Effects of spatial rearrangement of object components on picture recognition in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav 65:465–475

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick-Steger K, Biederman I, Wasserman EA (1998) Effects of geon depletion, scrambling, and movement on picture recognition in pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Proc 24:34–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Latto R (1995) The brain of the beholder. In: Gregory R, Harris J, Heard P, Rose D (eds) The artful eye. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 66–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazareva OF, Vecera SP, Wasserman EA (2006a) Object discrimination in pigeons: effects of local and global cues. Vis Res 46:1361–1374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lazareva OF, Freiburger KL, Wasserman EA (2006b) Effects of stimulus manipulation on visual categorization in pigeons. Behav Proc 72:224–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legge ELG, Spetch ML, Batty ER (2009) Pigeons’ (Columba livia) hierarchical organization of local and global cues in touch screen tasks. Behav Proc 80:128–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsusaka A, Inoue S, Jitsumori M (2004) Pigeon’s recognition of artoon: effects of fragmentation, scrambling, and deletion of elements. Behav Proc 65:25–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller G (2000) Mating mind. Brockman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris D (1962) The biology of art. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Navon D (1977) Forest before trees: the precedence of global features in visual perception. Cogn Psychol 9:353–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otsuka Y, Yanagi J, Watanabe S (2009) Discrimination and reinforcing stimulus properties of music for rats. Behav Proc 80:121–127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran VS, Hirstein W (1999) The science of art. J Consci Stud 6(7):15–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Redies C (2007) A universal model of esthetic perception based on the sensory coding of natural stimuli. Spat Vis 21:97–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rensch B (1957) Asthetische Faktoren bei Farb- und Formbevorzugungen von Affen. Z Tierpsychol 14:71–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rensch B (1958) Die Wirksomkeit aesthetischer Factoren bei Wirbeltieren. Z Tierpsychol 15:447–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voland E, Grammer K (eds) (2003) Evolutionary aesthetics. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe S (2001a) Discrimination of cartoon and photographs in pigeons: effects of scrambling of elements. Behav Proc 53:3–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe S (2001b) Van Gogh, Chagall and pigeons. Anim Cogn 4:147–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe S (2010) Pigeons can discriminate “good” and “bad” paintings by children. Anim Cogn 13:75–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe S, Ito Y (1991) Individual recognition in pigeon. Bird Behav 36:20–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe S, Nemoto M (1998) Reinforcing property of music in Java sparrows (Padda oryzivora). Behav Proc 43:211–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe S, Wakita M, Sakamoto J (1995) Discrimination of Monet and Picasso in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav 63:165–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zeki S (1999) Inner vision: an exploration of art and the brain. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeller A (2007) “What’s in a picture?” A comparison of drawings by ape and children. Semiotica 166:181–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author wants to express his thanks to the elementary school of Keio for providing me samples of children’s paintings. This research was supported by Program of Global COE (Center of excellence) in Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Keio University, Mita 2-15-45, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, 108, Japan

    Shigeru Watanabe

Authors
  1. Shigeru Watanabe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shigeru Watanabe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Watanabe, S. Discrimination of painting style and quality: pigeons use different strategies for different tasks. Anim Cogn 14, 797–808 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-011-0412-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-011-0412-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation