Whole-Ecosystem Experiments: Replication Versus Realism: The Need for Ecosystem-Scale Experiments
- David W. SchindlerAffiliated withDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E9
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The results of bottle and mesocosm experiments were compared with those obtained in whole-ecosystem experiments at the Experimental Lakes Area. Unless they can be cleverly designed to mimic major ecosystem processes and community compositions, smaller-scale experiments often give highly replicable, but spurious, answers. Problems with appropriate scaling are difficult to deduce without direct comparisons with whole-ecosystem experiments. Reasons are many, but include inappropriate spatial scales to include whole communities, in particular predators and nocturnally active animals; temporal scales that are too short to assess accurately the response of slow-responding organisms and biogeochemical processes; and elimination of key littoral–pelagic and catchment–lake interactions. Identical studies of limnological processes in lakes of a large range of sizes reveals that scaling correction is also necessary when extrapolating from small lakes to large ones. Accurate management decisions cannot be made with confidence unless ecosystem scales are studied.
- Whole-Ecosystem Experiments: Replication Versus Realism: The Need for Ecosystem-Scale Experiments
Volume 1, Issue 4 , pp 323-334
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Additional Links
- Key words: mesocosms; ecosystem experiments; Experimental Lakes Area; spatial and temporal scales.
- David W. Schindler (A0)
- Author Affiliations
- A0. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E9, CA