Relationships Between Tree and Soil Properties in Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris Forests in Sweden Authors
First Online: 17 February 2010 Received: 06 March 2009 Accepted: 25 January 2010 DOI:
Cite this article as: Ladanai, S., Ågren, G.I. & Olsson, B.A. Ecosystems (2010) 13: 302. doi:10.1007/s10021-010-9319-4 Abstract
The exchange of elements between plants and the soil in which they are growing creates reciprocal control of their element composition. Within plants, the growth rate hypothesis from ecological stoichiometry implies a strong coupling between C, N, and P. No similar theory exists for predicting relationships between elements in the soil or relationships between plants and the soil. We used a data set of element concentrations in needles and humus of Scots pine (
Pinus sylvestris) and Norway spruce ( Picea abies) forests in Sweden to investigate the extent to which relationships between elements (C, N, P, S, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Al) can be observed within and between plants and soils. We found element composition to be more strongly controlled in needles than in humus. Elements that are covalently bound were also more strongly controlled, with no apparent differences between macro- and micronutrients. With the exception of N/C, there were surprisingly few relationships between elements in needles and humus. We found no major differences between the two tree species studied, but investigations of additional forest types are needed for firm conclusions. More control over element composition was exercised with respect to N than C, particularly in needles, so it might be advantageous to express nutrient concentrations relative to N rather than on a dry weight or carbon basis. Variations in many ecosystem variables appeared to lack ecological significance and thus an important task is to identify the meaningful predictors. Keywords conifers ecosystem variables element composition control stoichiometry humus needles Author Contributions
SL, GIÅ, BO conceived the study; SL analyzed data; SL, GIÅ, BO wrote the article.
Ågren GI. 2004. The C:N:P stoichiometry of autotrophs: theory and observations. Ecol Lett 7:185–91.
Ågren GI. 2008. Stoichiometry and nutrition of plant growth in natural communities. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39:153–70.
Ågren GI, Bosatta E. 1998. Theoretical ecosystem ecology—understanding element cycles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p 234.
Attiwill PM, Adams MA. 1993. Nutrient cycling in forests. New Phytol 124:561–82.
Bauer G, Schulze ED, Mund M. 1997. Nutrient contents and concentrations in relation to growth of
along a European transect. Tree Physiol 17:777–86.
Casper BB, Cahill JF, Jackson RB. 2000. Plant competition in spatially heterogeneous environments. In: Hutchings MJ, John EA, Stewart AJA, Eds. The ecological consequences of environmental heterogeneity. Oxford: Blackwell. p 111–30.
Field C, Mooney HA. 1986. The photosynthesis-nitrogen relationship in wild plants. In: Givnish T, Ed. On the economy of plant form and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p 25–55.
Fink S. 1991. The micromorphological distribution of bound calcium in needles of Norway spruce [
(L.) Karst.]. New Phytol 119:33–40.
Fraústo da Silva JJR, Williams RJP. 2001. The biological chemistry of the elements—the inorganic chemistry of life. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p 575.
Gallardo A, Covelo F. 2005. Spatial pattern and scale of leaf N and P concentration in a
population. Plant Soil 273:269–77.
Güsewell S. 2005. Nutrient resorption of wetland graminoids is related to the type of nutrient limitation. Funct Ecol 19:344–54.
Hägglund B, Lundmark JE. 1977. Site index estimation by means of site properties. Scots pine and Norway spruce in Sweden. Stud For Suec 138:1–38.
Hallett RA, Hornbeck JW. 1997. Foliar and soil nutrient relationships in red oak and white pine forests. Can J For Res 27:1233–44.
Huntington TG, Perat DR, Hornig J, Ryan DF, Russo-Savage S. 1990. Relationship between soil chemistry, foliar chemistry, and condition of red spruce at Mount Moosilauke, New Hampshire. Can J For Res 20:1219–27.
Jandl R, Herzberger E. 2001. Is soil chemistry an indicator of tree nutrition and stand productivity? Bodenkultur 52:155–63.
Killingbeck KT. 1996. Nutrients in senesced leaves: keys to the search for potential resorption and resorption proficiency. Ecology 77:1716–27.
Knecht MF, Göransson A. 2004. Terrestrial plants require nutrients in similar proportions. Tree Physiol 24:447–60.
Linder S. 1995. Foliar analysis for detecting and correcting nutrient imbalances in Norway spruce. Ecol Bull 44:178–90.
McGill WB, Cole CV. 1981. Comparative aspects of cycling of organic C, N, S and P through soil organic matter. Geoderma 26:267–86.
McGroddy ME, Daufresne T, Hedin LO. 2004. Scaling of C:N:P stoichiometry in forests worldwide: implications of terrestrial Redfield-type ratios. Ecology 85:2390–401.
Melillo JM, Aber JD, Linkins AE, Ricca A, Fry B, Nadelhoffer KJ. 1989. Carbon and nitrogen dynamics along the decay continuum: plant litter to soil organic matter. Plant Soil 115:189–98.
Merilä P, Derome J. 2008. Relationships between needle nutrient composition in Scots pine and Norway spruce stands and the respective concentrations in the organic layer and in percolation water. Boreal Environ Res 13B:35–47.
Moore TR, Trofymow JA, Prescott CE, Fyles J, Titus BD. 2006. Patterns of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics in decomposing foliar litter in Canadian forests. Ecosystems 9:46–62.
Newman GS, Hart SC. 2006. Nutrient covariance between forest foliage and fine roots. For Ecol Manag 236:136–41.
Odum EP. 1971. Fundamentals of ecology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company. p 574.
Perakis S, Maguire D, Bullen T, Cromack K, Waring RH, Boyle JR. 2006. Coupled nitrogen and calcium cycles in forests of the Oregon Coast Range. Ecosystems 9:63–74.
Raab B, Vedin H. 1995. The National Atlas of Sweden: climate, lakes and rivers. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
Reich PR, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS. 1997. From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:13730–4.
Redfield AC. 1958. The biological control of chemical factors in the environment. Am Sci 46:205–21.
Reimann C, Koller F, Frengstad B, Kashulina G, Niskavaara H, Englmaier P. 2001. Comparison of the element composition in several plant species and their substrate from a 1 500 000-km
area in Northern Europe. Sci Total Environ 278:87–112.
Saarsalmi A, Starr M, Hokkanen T, Ukonmaanaho L, Kukkola M, Nöjd P, Sievänen R. 2007. Predicting annual canopy litterfall production for Norway spruce (
(L.) Karst.) stands. For Ecol Manag 242:578–86.
Selinus O. 1996. Large-scale monitoring in environmental geochemistry. Environ Geochem 11:251–60.
Starr M, Saarsalmi A, Hokkanen T, Merilä P, Helmisaari HS. 2005. Models of litterfall production for Scots pine (
L.) in Finland using stand, site and climate factors. For Ecol Manag 205:215–25.
Sterner RW, Elser JJ. 2002. Ecological stoichiometry—the biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere. Princeton: Princeton University Press. p 439.
Tamm CO. 1991. Nitrogen in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecological studies 81. Berlin: Springer. p 115.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. 2000. Manual on methods and criteria for harmonized sampling, assessment, monitoring and analysis of the effects of air pollution on forests, part IV: sampling and analysis of needles and leaves. UN-ECE. Programme Coordination Centre, Hamburg.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. 2006. Manual on methods and criteria for harmonized sampling, assessment, monitoring and analysis of the effects of air pollution on forests, part IIIa: sampling and analysis of soil, (Annex). UN-ECE. Programme Coordination Centre, Hamburg.
Vitousek PM, Aplet G, Turner D, Lockwood JJ. 1992. The Mauna-Loa environmental matrix – foliar and soil nutrients. Oecologia 89:372–82.
von Liebig J. 1840. Die Chemie in der Anwendung auf Agrikultur. Braunschweig: Friedrich Vieweg und Sohn Publ. Co.
Watanabe T, Broadley MR, Jansen S, White PJ, Takada J, Satake K, Takamatsu T, Tuah SJ, Osaki M. 2007. Evolutionary control of leaf element composition in plants. New Phytol 174:516–23.
Wood TE, Lawrence D, Clark DA. 2006. Determinants of leaf litter nutrient cycling in a tropical rain forest: soil fertility versus topography. Ecosystems 9:700–10.
CrossRef Copyright information
© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010