, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 238–249

Browsing-induced Effects on Leaf Litter Quality and Decomposition in a Southern African Savanna


DOI: 10.1007/s10021-007-9119-7

Cite this article as:
Fornara, D.A. & Du Toit, J.T. Ecosystems (2008) 11: 238. doi:10.1007/s10021-007-9119-7


We investigated the linkages between leaf litter quality and decomposability in a savanna plant community dominated by palatable-spinescent tree species. We measured: (1) leaf litter decomposability across five woody species that differ in leaf chemistry; (2) mass decomposition, nitrogen (N); and carbon (C) dynamics in leaf litter of a staple browse species (Acacia nigrescens) as well as (3) variation in litter composition across six sites that experienced very different histories of attack from large herbivores. All decomposition trials included litter bags filled with chopped straw to control for variation in site effects. We found a positive relationship between litter quality and decomposability, but we also found that Acacia and straw litter mass remaining did not significantly vary between heavily and lightly browsed sites. This is despite the fact that both the quality and composition of litter returned to the soil were significantly different across sites. We observed greater N resorption from senescing Acacia leaves at heavily browsed sites, which in turn contributed to increase the C:N ratio of leaf litter and caused greater litter N immobilization over time. This, together with the significantly lower tree- and herb-leaf litter mass beneath heavily browsed trees, should negatively affect decomposition rates. However, estimated dung and urine N deposition from both browsers and grazers was significantly greater at high- than at low-herbivory sites. We hypothesize that N inputs from dung and urine boost litter N mineralization and decomposition (especially following seasonal rainfall events), and thereby offset the effects of poor leaf litter quality at chronically browsed sites.


Acacia plant defences ungulate herbivory ecosystem functioning nutrient cycling 

Supplementary material

10021_2007_9119_MOESM1_ESM.tif (1.7 mb)
(TIF 1704 kb)
10021_2007_9119_MOESM2_ESM.tif (1.6 mb)
(TIF 1659 kb)
10021_2007_9119_MOESM3_ESM.tif (1.9 mb)
(TIF 1975 kb)
10021_2007_9119_MOESM4_ESM.tif (1.9 mb)
(TIF 1938 kb)
10021_2007_9119_MOESM5_ESM.tif (1.8 mb)
(TIF 1856 kb)

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology, Evolution and BehaviorUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA
  2. 2.Mammal Research Institute, Department of Zoology and EntomologyUniversity of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa
  3. 3.Department of Wildland ResourcesUtah State UniversityLoganUSA

Personalised recommendations