Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Windfall gains or eco-innovation? ‘Green’ evolution in the Swedish innovation system

  • Research Article
  • Green Growth, Eco Innovation and Sustainable Transitions
  • Published:
Environmental Economics and Policy Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper therefore looks closer into climate gas emission and the shift to non-fossil energy in Sweden. What types of organizations are behind the shift to non-fossil energy use, what are the relative effects on emissions, to what extent can these interactive dynamics be considered eco-innovations? Do these effects vary between public and private organizations, and if so, can they be related to specific institutions and policies? Methods include statistical survival analyses, in particular Cox regression. These analyses inform us why energy sources shift. Results indicate that wood fuel and solid waste increase as sources of energy while fossil oil has decreased between 2003 and 2010. This result is in line with industrial and environmental policies of the Swedish governments that present these facts as institutionally and policy-related ‘green innovation’. However, our analysis contests such a conclusion and it is noticed that the shift to non-fossil sources of energy has not led to verifiable decreases in green-house gas emissions. Results instead suggest that ‘green’ innovation of non-fossil energy was mostly the effect of low-tech innovation in public organizations with no fundamental effect on CO2 emissions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See instead IEA 2010 and Zetterberg 2011 on this important topic.

  2. In the documentation from Statistics Sweden (1988, 1991), the quality of RAMS is discussed in “Årlig regional sysselsättningsstatistik 1988:7” and “Kvalitetsdeklaration av den årliga regionala sysselsättningsstatistiken 1991:1”, Statistics Sweden.

  3. Fossil fuels are well known to be the main contributors to CO2 emissions (IPCC 2007b).

  4. The decrease in emissions and consumption registered in the last year of their series could be related to the sharp slowdown of the economy in 2009, which is linked to the global economic crisis of that year.

References

  • Aldrich H (2003) Organizations evolving. Sage Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong F, Blundell K (2007) Energy: beyond oil. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Arundel A, Kemp R (2009) Measuring eco-innovation. UNU-MERIT Working Paper Series. UNU-MERIT, Maastricht

  • Bergek A, Jacobsson S, Hekkert M, Smith K (2010) Functionality of innovation systems as a rational for and guide to innovation policy. In: Smits R, Shapira P, Kuhlmann S (eds) The theory and practice of innovation policy: an international research handbook. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 115–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergh JCJM (2007) Evolutionary economics and environmental policy: survival of the greenest. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

  • Bergquist A-K, Söderholm K (2011) Green innovation systems in Swedish Industry, 1960–1989. Bus Hist Rev 85:677–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson B, Elg L, Jacobsson S (2010) Reflections on the co-evolution of innovation theory, policy and practice: the emergence of the Swedish Agency for Innovation Systems. In: Smits R, Shapira P, Kuhlmann S (eds) The theory and practice of innovation policy: an international research handbook. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 145–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll G, Hannan MT (2000) The demography of corporations and industries. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaminade C, Edquist C (2010) Inside the public scientific system: changing modes of knowledge production. In: Smits R, Shapira P, Kuhlmann S (eds) The theory and practice of innovation policy: an international research handbook. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 95–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombelli A, Krafft J, Quatraro F (2013) Properties of knowledge base and firm survival: evidence from a sample of French manufacturing firms. Technol Forecast Soc Change 80:1469–1483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke P (2012) Complex adaptive innovation systems: relatedness and transversality in the evolving region. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Costantini V, Crespi F (2013) Public policies for a sustainable energy sector: regulation, diversity and fostering of innovation. J Evol Econ 23:401–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costantini V, Valeria C, Massimiliano M (2012) On the green and innovative side of trade competitiveness? The impact of environmental policies and innovation on EU exports. Res Polit 41:132

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi G (1981) Technical change and survival: Europe’s semiconductor industry. Sussex European Research Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton

  • Edquist C (2011) Systems of innovation: technologies, institutions and organizations. Routledge, Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • Energimyndigheten (2013) Energiindikatorer 2013. Uppföljning av Sveriges energipolitiska mål. In: Energimyndigheten (ed) Energimyndigheten, Stockholm

  • Faber A, Frenken K (2009) Models in evolutionary economics and environmental policy: towards an evolutionary environmental economics. Technol Forecast Soc Change 76:462–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figge F, Hahn T (2004) Sustainable value added—measuring corporate contributions to sustainability beyond eco-efficiency. Ecol Econ 48:173–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman C (1988) Japan: a new national system of innovation? In: Dosi G, Freeman C, Nelson RR, Silverberg G, Soete L (eds) Technical change and economic theory. Pinter Publishers, London, pp 330–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman C (1992) The economics of hope: essays on technical change, economic growth, and the environment. Pinter Publishers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghisetti C, Quatraro F (2013) Beyond inducement in climate change: does environmental performance spur environmental technologies? A regional analysis of cross-sectoral differences. Ecol Econ 96:99–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilli M, Mazzanti M, Nicolli F (2013) Sustainability and competitiveness in evolutionary perspectives: environmental innovations, structural change and economic dynamics in the EU. J Socio-Econ 45:204–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guziana B (2011) Is the Swedish environmental technology sector ‘green’? J Clean Prod 19:827–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halila F, Rundquist J (2011) The development and market success of eco-innovations: a comparative study of eco-innovations and “other” innovations in Sweden. Eur J Innov Manag 14:278–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan MT, Freeman J (1989) Organizational ecology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hekkert MP, Suurs RAA, Negro SO, Kuhlmann S, Smits REHM (2007) Functions of innovation systems: a new approach for analysing technological change. Technol Forecast Soc Change 74:413–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschleifer J (1977) Economics from a biological viewpoint. J Law Econ XX:1–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hörte SA, Halila F (2008) Success factors for eco-innovations and other innovations. Int J Innov Sustain Dev 3:301–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2010) Bioenergy, land use change and climate mitigation. IEA Bioenergy: ExCo 2010: 03

  • IPCC (2007a) Climate change 2007: synthesis report. In: Pachauri RK, Reisinger A (eds) Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the forth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva

  • IPCC (2007b) Summary for policy makers. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M and Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science base. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Climate Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Jensen MB, Johnson B, Lorenz E, Lundvall B-Å (2007) Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Res Polit 36:680–693

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp R (1997) Environmental policy and technical change: a comparison of the technological impact of policy instruments. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln SF (2012) Options for change in the Australian energy profile. Ambio 41:841–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall B-Å (1988) Innovation as an interactive process: from user–producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In: Freeman C, Nelson RR, Silverberg G, Soete L (eds) Dosi G. Pinter Publishers, London, pp 349–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall B-Å (1992) National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter Publishers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokyr J (1991) Evolutionary biology, technological change and economic history. Bull Econ Res 43:127–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RR (1993) National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardo MCI, Silveira S (2013) Energy efficiency and CO2 emissions in Swedish manufacturing industries. Energy Effic 6:117–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME, van der Linde C (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment–competitiveness relationship. J Econ Perspect 9:97–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safarzynska K, van den Bergh JC (2013) An evolutionary model of energy transitions with interactive innovation-selection dynamics. J Evol Econ 23:271–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg M (1999) Green post-communism? Environmental aid, Polish innovation, and evolutionary political economics. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg M (2006) The evolution of IT innovations in Swedish organizations: a Darwinian critique of ‘Lamarckian’ institutional economics. J Evol Econ 17:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt TS, Schneider M, Hoffmann VH (2012) Decarbonising the power sector via technological change—differing contributions from heterogeneous firms. Energy Policy 43:466–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (1934) The theory of economic development; an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (1947) The creative response in economic history. J Econ Hist VII:149–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverberg G (1988) Modelling economic dynamics and technical change: mathematical approaches to self-organisation and evolution. In: Dosi G, Freeman C, Nelson RR, Silverberg G, Soete L (eds) Technical change and economic theory. Pinter Publishers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Sweden (1988) Årlig regional sysselsättningsstatistik 1988:7. Statistics Sweden (SCB), Stockholm

  • Statistics Sweden (1991) Kvalitetsdeklaration av den årliga regionala sysselsättningsstatistiken 1991:1. Statistics Sweden (SCB), Stockholm

  • Statistics Sweden (2008) Miljöräkenskaper. Statistics Sweden, SCB, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Sweden (2010) Annual Energy Balance Sheets 2007–2008. Statistics Sweden. SCB, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Tukker A, Charter M, Vezzoli C, Sto E, Andersen MM (eds) (2008) System innovation for sustainability, vol 1. Perspectives on radical changes to sustainable consumption and production. Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield

  • Wang Z, Zhang B, Yin J (2012) Determinants of the increased CO2 emission and adaption strategy in Chinese energy-intensive industry. Nat Hazards 62:17–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witthaus B (2012) International climate regime and its driving-forces: obstacles and chances on the way to a global response to the problem of climate change. Diplomica Verlag, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Zetterberg L (2011) Instruments for reaching climate objectives—focusing on the time aspects of bioenergy and allocation rules in the European Union’s emissions trading system. Gothenburg University, Diss

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was financed by the Crafoord Foundation (Grant No. 20120695). The authors are also grateful for useful comments from participants of the 3rd edition of the international conference Governance of a Complex World 2014 (GCW 2014), “Smart, inclusive and sustainable growth: lessons and challenges ahead”, 18–20 June, 2014, Campus Luigi Einaudi (CLE), Lungo Dora Siena 100, Turin (Italy). We especially thank Paola Cardamore and two anonymous referees for useful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Halmstad, Box 823, 301 18, Halmstad, Sweden

    Max Rånge & Mikael Sandberg

Authors
  1. Max Rånge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mikael Sandberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikael Sandberg.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rånge, M., Sandberg, M. Windfall gains or eco-innovation? ‘Green’ evolution in the Swedish innovation system. Environ Econ Policy Stud 18, 229–246 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-015-0128-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-015-0128-z

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation