Abstract
Currently in the United States, women who have abortions face a societal culture in which disapproval, stigma, and misinformation about the risks and sequelae of abortion are common. The purpose of this study is to pilot test an intervention that introduces abortion patients to a “culture of support” by providing validating messages and information about groups and services that support women in their reproductive decisions, addressing stigma, and providing information to help women identify and avoid sources of abortion misinformation. Twenty-two women who completed their post-operative exam after abortion were enrolled to take part in the study intervention. In-depth interviews were conducted to explore patient experiences and responses to the intervention. All (22/22) participants responded that they believed that interventions like the one studied could help women avoid letting the judgmental actions and attitudes of others “get to them so much”. All (20/20) participants felt that the intervention was personally helpful to them. An intervention that introduces women having abortions to a “culture of support” was well-received. This study provides a framework for future research about the content, strength, and effect of societal and cultural influences on women having abortions and for additional research about interventions to promote resilience after abortion.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The strongest predictor of mental health after an abortion is mental health prior to abortion (Major et al. 2008). However, addressing mental health prior to abortion is beyond the scope of this research.
Our Truths-Nuestras Verdades is a magazine published by EXHALE: http://www.ourtruths.org/magazines/OurTruths-NuestrasVerdades-Winter2009.pdf.
The EXHALE website: http://www.4exhale.org/mission.php.
References
Adler NE (1975) Emotional responses of women following therapeutic abortion. Amer J Orthopsychiat 45(3):446–454
Adler NE, David HP, Major BN, Roth SH, Russo NF, Wyatt GE (1992) Psychological factors in abortion: a review. Am Psychol 47(10):1194–204
American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (2009) ACOG (American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology) committee opinion: induced abortion and breast cancer risk. Obstet Gynecol 113(6):1417–1418
Baker A, Berg JS (2002) Women Know. In: Jacob K (ed) Our choices, our lives: unapologetic writings on abortion. Writers Advantage, Lincoln, pp 3–5
Beckwith FJ (2001) Taking abortion seriously: a philosophical critique of the new anti-abortion rhetorical shift. Ethics & Medicine: A Christian Perspective on Issues in Bioethics 17(3):155–166
Beral V, Bull D, Doll R, Peto R, Reeves G, Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer (2004) Breast cancer and abortion: collaborative reanalysis of data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 83,000 women with breast cancer from 16 countries. Lancet 363(9414):1007–1016
Borkin J (1992) Immersion/Crystallization. In: Crabtree BF, Miller WL (eds) Doing qualitative research, 2nd edn. Sage, California, pp 179–194
Cannold L (2002) Understanding and responding to anti-choice women-centred strategies. Reprod health matters 10(19):171–179
Charles VE, Polis CB, Sridhara SK, Blum RW (2008) Abortion and long-term mental health outcomes: a systematic review of the evidence. Contraception 78(6):436–450
Curfman GD, Morrissey S, Greene MF, Drazen JM (2008) Physicians and the first amendment. N Engl J Med 359(23):2484–2485
Donohoe M (2005) Increase in obstacles to abortion: the american perspective in 2004. J Am Med Women’s Assoc 60(1):16–25
Di Mauro D, Joffe C (2007) The religious right and the reshaping of sexual policy: an examination of reproductive rights and sexuality education. Sexuality research and social policy [serial online],4(1): 67–92. Available from: URL: http://www.longviewinstitute.org/research/joffe/religiousrightandsexuality. Accessed 8 July 2009.
Ferree MM, Gamson WA, Gerhards J, Rucht D (2002) Framing. In: Ferree MM, Gamson WA, Gerhards J, Rucht D (eds) Shaping abortion discourse: democracy and the public sphere in germany and the united states. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Finer LB, Frohwirth LF, Dauphinee LA, Singh S, Moore AM (2005) Reasons U.S. women have abortions: quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 37(3):110–118
Gallup (2009) Gallup poll abortion: http://www.gallup.com/poll/1576/abortion.aspx. Accessed 1 July 2009
Gallup (2009) Gallup poll morality issues 2009: http://www.gallup.com/poll/1681/Moral-Issues.aspx . Accessed 1 July 2009
Goffman E (1963) Stigma; notes on the management of spoiled identity. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Hogue CJ (1986) Impact of abortion on subsequent fecundity. Clin Obstet Gynaecol 13(1):95–103
Jones RK, Frohwirth LF, Moore AM (2008) “I would want to give my child, like, everything in the world”: how issues of motherhood influence women who have abortions. J Fam Issues 29(1):79–99
Jones RK, Kost K, Singh S, Henshaw SK, Finer LB (2009) Trends in abortion in the united states. Clin Obstet Gynecol 52(2):119–129
Jordan B, Wells ES (2009) A 21st-century trojan horse: the “abortion harms women” anti-choice argument disguises a harmful movement. Contraception 79(3):161–164
Kist W (2005) New literacies in action: teaching and learning in multiple media. Teachers College Press, New York
Kress G, Van Leeuwen T (2001) Multimodal: the modes and media of contemporary communication. Arnold, London
Kulczycki A (2007) Ethics, ideology, and reproductive health policy in the United States. Stud Fam Plann 38(4):333–51
Kumar A, Hessini L, Mitchell EM (2009) Conceptualising abortion stigma. Culture, Health & Sexuality. 99999:1. doi: 10.1080/13691050902842741.
Lakoff G (2007) Introduction: framing is about ideas, and ideas matter. In: Feldman J (ed) Framing the debate. Ig Publishing, New York, pp xi–xvii
Lakoff G (1996) Moral politics: what conservatives know that liberals don’t. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Lakoff G (2004) Don’t think of an elephant! : know your values and frame the debate : the essential guide for progressives. Chelsea Green Pub. Co., White River Junction
Lazarus RS, Folkman S (1984) Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer, New York
Lazzarini Z (2008) South Dakota’s abortion script—threatening the physician-patient relationship. N Eng J Med 359(21):2189–2191
Major B, Mueller P, Hildebrandt K (1985) Attributions, expectations, and coping with abortion. J Pers Soc Psychol 48(3):585–99
Major B, Cozzarelli C, Sciacchitano AM, Cooper ML, Testa M, Mueller PM (1990) Perceived social support, self-efficacy, and adjustment to abortion. J Pers Soc Psychol 59(3):452–63
Major B, Cooper ML, Zubek JM, Cozzarelli C (1997) Mixed messages: implications of social conflict and social support within close relationships for adjustment to a stressful life event. J Pers Soc Psychol 72(6):1349–63
Major B, Richards C, Cooper ML, Cozzarelli C, Zubek J (1998) Personal resilience, cognitive appraisals, and coping: An integrative model of adjustment to abortion. J Pers Soc Psychol 74(3):735–752
Major B, Gramzow R (1999) Abortion as stigma: cognitive and emotional implications of concealment. J Pers Soc Psychol 77(4):735–45
Major B, Appelbaum M, Beckman L, Dutton M, Russo, NF, West C (2008) Report of the APA Task Force on Mental Health and Abortion. 08/13/08. http://www.apa.org/releases/abortion-report.pdf . Accessed 8 July 2009.
Mueller P, Major B (1989) Self-blame, self-efficacy, and adjustment to abortion. J Pers Soc Psychol 57(6):1059–1068
National Cancer Institute (2005) Summary report: early reproductive events and breast cancer workshop. Issues Law Med 21(2):161–165
O’Connell K, Jones HE, Simon M, Saporta V, Paul M, Lichtenberg ES (2009) First-trimester surgical abortion practices: a survey of national abortion federation members. Contraception 79(5):385–392
Osofsky JD, Osofsky HJ (1972) The psychological reaction of patients to legalized abortion. Am J Orthopsychiatry 42(1):48–60
Ott MA, Santelli JS (2007) Abstinence and abstinence-only education. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 19(5):446–452
Reardon DC (2002) A defense of the neglected rhetorical strategy (NRS). Ethics & Medicine: A Christian Perspective on Issues in Bioethics 18(2):23–32
Rohlinger DA (2002) Framing the abortion debate: organizational resources, media strategies, and movement-countermovement dynamics. Sociol Q 43(4):479–507
Russo NF, Denious JE (2005) Controlling birth: science, politics, and public policy. The Journal of Social Issues 61(1):181–191
Stotland NL (2003) Abortion and psychiatric practice. J Psychiatr Pract 9(2):139–149
Vrij A, Nunkoosing K, Paterson B, Oosterwegel A, Soukara S (2002) Characteristics of secrets and the frequency, reasons and effects of secret keeping and disclosure. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 12:56–70. doi:10.1002/casp.652
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank all the women in the study who spoke with us about their personal experiences. We would like to thank the Mount Sinai School of Medicine Departments of Community and Preventive Medicine and Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science for their support. We would also like to thank Susan Cullman and Peggy Danziger for their expertise and valuable feedback.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Littman, L.L., Zarcadoolas, C. & Jacobs, A.R. Introducing abortion patients to a culture of support: a pilot study. Arch Womens Ment Health 12, 419–431 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-009-0095-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-009-0095-0