Date: 26 Jun 2007
Automated depression screening in disadvantaged pregnant women in an urban obstetric clinic
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Objective: A promising means of screening for depression among high-risk perinatal women involves interactive voice response (IVR) technology in which patients self-enter data into a database using a touch tone telephone. Our aim was to test the feasibility of using IVR to screen for depression among low-income, urban pregnant patients and to solicit their preferences for treatment.
Methods: The study population included a convenience sample of English-speaking pregnant patients awaiting routine prenatal visits in an urban obstetric clinic. Consenting subjects used a phone in a private clinic room to complete an IVR version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). Patients scoring in the “not depressed” range were branched to a closing message while those with mild to severe depressive symptoms were branched to additional automated questions about their treatment preferences.
Results: All 54 participants who consented to the study were able to complete the IVR phone session. More than 90% expressed willingness to complete IVR interviews as part of routine prenatal and postpartum care. Sixteen out of 54 participants (29.6%) scored in the moderate to severe range for depressive symptoms (EPDS ≥ 12) which was consistent with a prior study in the same population using a validated paper-pencil screen. Only 12 out of 21 (57%) depressed subjects indicated a desire to speak with a health care provider about how they are feeling. The majority of these depressed subjects preferred to speak with a social worker about housing or financial problems (92%) or an obstetrician or midwife (83%), while a minority (42%) wanted to speak with a mental health professional.
Conclusions: This pilot study suggests that it is feasible to use an automated phone interview to screen for depression in low-income, urban pregnant women.
Agel, J, Rockwood, T, Mundt, JC, Greist, JH, Swiontkowski, M 2001Comparison of interactive voice response and written self-administered patient surveys for clinical researchOrthopedics2411551157PubMed
Buist, AE, Barnett, BEW, Milstrom, J, Pope, S, Condon, JT, Ellwood, DA, Boyce, PM, Austin, MPV, Hayes, BA 2002To screen or not to screen – that is the question in perinatal depressionMJA177S101S105PubMed
Carter, FA, Carter, JD, Luty, SE, Wilson, DA, Frampton, CM, Joyce, PR 2005Screening and treatment for depression during pregnancy: a cautionary noteAust N Z J Psych39255261CrossRef
Kobak, KA, Mundt, JC, Greist, JH, Katzelnick, DJ, Jefferson, JW 2000Computer assessment of depression: automating the Hamilton depression rating scaleDrug Inform J34145156
Kutner, M, Greenberg, E, Jin, Y, Paulsen, C 2006The health literacy of America’s adults: results from the 2003 national assessment of adult literacy. NCES2006-483US Department of EducationWashington, DC
Mitchell, AM, Mittelstaedt, ME, Schott-Baer, D 2006Postpartum depression: the reliability of telephone screeningMCN Am J Matern Child Nurs31383387CrossRef
Murray, D, Cox, JL 1990Screening for depression during pregnancy with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression ScaleJ Reprod Infant Psychol899107
Nonacs, R, Cohen, LS 2002Depression during pregnancy: diagnosis and treatment optionsJ Clin Psychiatry632430PubMed
Sherbourne, CD, Dwight-Johnson, M, Klap, R 2001Psychological distress, unmet need, and barriers to mental health care for womenWomens Health Iss11231243CrossRef
Zelkowitz, P, Milet, TH 1995Screening for post-partum depression in a community sampleCan J Psychiatry Rev Can Psych408086
- Automated depression screening in disadvantaged pregnant women in an urban obstetric clinic
Archives of Women's Mental Health
Volume 10, Issue 4 , pp 163-169
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Keywords: Interactive voice response (IVR); depression screening; underserved women
- Industry Sectors