Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A combined dynamical and statistical downscaling technique to reduce biases in climate projections: an example for winter precipitation and snowpack in the western United States

Theoretical and Applied Climatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Large biases associated with climate projections are problematic when it comes to their regional application in the assessment of water resources and ecosystems. Here, we demonstrate a method that can reduce systematic biases in regional climate projections. The global and regional climate models employed to demonstrate the technique are the Community Climate System Model (CCSM) and the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. The method first utilized a statistical regression technique and a global reanalysis dataset to correct biases in the CCSM-simulated variables (e.g., temperature, geopotential height, specific humidity, and winds) that are subsequently used to drive the WRF model. The WRF simulations were conducted for the western United States and were driven with (a) global reanalysis, (b) original CCSM, and (c) bias-corrected CCSM data. The bias-corrected CCSM data led to a more realistic regional climate simulation of precipitation and associated atmospheric dynamics, as well as snow water equivalent (SWE), in comparison to the original CCSM-driven WRF simulation. Since most climate applications rely on existing global model output as the forcing data (i.e., they cannot re-run or change the global model), which often contain large biases, this method provides an effective and economical tool to reduce biases in regional climate downscaling simulations of water resource variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brekke L, Raff D, Werner K, White K, Wood A (2012) Anticipating, preparing for, and managing through extreme weather and climate events: water resource managers’ needs for improved weather and climate prediction information. 10th Annual Climate Prediction Applications Science Workshop,March 13–15, 2012, Miami

    Google Scholar 

  • Brekke L, Thrasher B, Pruitt T, Maurer EP, Tebaldi C, Arnold JR, Long J (2013) New CMIP5 downscaled climate and hydrology projections. 11th Annual Climate Prediction Applications Science Workshop, April 23–25, 2013, Logan

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen N, Wood A, Voisin N, Lettenmaier D, Palmer R (2004) The effects of climate change on the hydrology and water resources of the Colorado River basin. Clim Change 62:337–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly C, Neilson RP, Phillips DL (1994) A statistical topographic model for mapping climatological precipitation over mountainous terrain. J Appl Meteorol 33:140–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dettinger M, Cayan D, Meyer M, Jeton A (2004) Simulated hydrologic responses to climate variations and change in the Merced, Carson, and American River basins, Sierra Nevada, California, 1900–2099. Clim Change 62:283–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dominguez F, Rivera E, Lettenmaier DP, Castro CL (2012) Changes in winter precipitation extremes for the western United States under a warmer climate as simulated by regional climate models. Geophys Res Lett 39:L05803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillies RR, Wang S, Booth MR (2012) Observational and synoptic analyses of the winter precipitation regime change over Utah. J Clim 25:4679–4698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez JM, San-Martin D, Brands S, Manzanas R, Herrera S (2013) Reassessing statistical downscaling techniques for their robust application under climate change conditions. J Clim 26:171–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayhoe K et al (2004) Emissions pathways, climate change, and impacts on California. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:12422–12427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitson BC, Crane RG (1996) Climate downscaling: techniques and application. Clim Res 7:85–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holton JR (1992) An introduction to dynamic meteorology, 3rd edn. Academic, San Diego, p 511

    Google Scholar 

  • Howat I, Tulaczyk S (2005) Climate sensitivity of spring snowpack in the Sierra Nevada. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 110:F04021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin J, Wen L (2012) Evaluation of snowmelt simulation in the weather research and forecasting model. J Geophys Res-Atmos 117:D10110

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin J, Wang SY, Gillies RR (2011) Improved Dynamical Downscaling of Climate Projections for the Western United States. Climate Change: Research and Technology for Adaptation and Mitigation, J. Blanco and H. Kheradmand eds., InTech, 23–38

  • Kalnay E et al (1996) The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77:437–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung LR, Qian Y, Bian XD (2003a) Hydroclimate of the western United States based on observations and regional climate simulation of 1981–2000. Part I: seasonal statistics. J Clim 16:1892–1911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung LR, Qian Y, Bian XD, Hunt A (2003b) Hydroclimate of the western United States based on observations and regional climate simulation of 1981–2000. Part II: mesoscale ENSO anomalies. J Clim 16:1912–1928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang X, Kunkel KE, Meehl GA, Jones RG, Wang JXL (2008) Regional climate models downscaling analysis of general circulation models present climate biases propagation into future change projections. Geophys Res Lett 35:L08709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAfee SA, Russell JL, Goodman PJ (2011) Evaluating IPCC AR4 cool-season precipitation simulations and projections for impacts assessment over North America. Clim Dyn 37:2271–2287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mearns LO et al (2012) The North American regional climate change assessment program overview of phase I results. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93:1337–1362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mearns LO et al (2013) Reply to “Comments on ‘the North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program: Overview of Phase I Results’”. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 94:1077–1079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller NL, Hayhoe K, Jin J, Auffhammer M (2008) Climate, extreme heat, and electricity demand in California. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 47:1834–1844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakicenvoic et al (2000) Special report on emissions scenarios. A special report of working group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 599

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielke RS (2013) Comments on “The North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program: Overview of Phase I Results”. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 94:1075–1077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pielke RA Sr, Wilby RL (2012) Regional climate downscaling: what’s the point? Eos Trans AGU 93(5):52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce DW et al (2013a) The key role of heavy precipitation events in climate model disagreements of future annual precipitation changes in California. J Clim 26:5879–5896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce DW et al (2013b) Probabilistic estimates of future changes in California temperature and precipitation using statistical and dynamical downscaling. Clim Dyn 40:839–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian Y, Ghan SJ, Leung LR (2010) Downscaling hydroclimatic changes over the Western US based on CAM subgrid scheme and WRF regional climate simulations. Int J Climatol 30:675–693

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen R et al (2011) High-resolution coupled climate runoff simulations of seasonal snowfall over Colorado: a process study of current and warmer climate. J Clim 24:3015–3048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salzmann N, Mearns LO (2012) Assessing the performance of multiple regional climate model simulations for seasonal mountain snow in the upper Colorado River Basin. J Hydrometeorol 13:539–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subin ZM, Riley WJ, Jin J, Christianson DS, Torn MS, Kueppers LM (2011) Ecosystem feedbacks to climate change in California: development, testing, and analysis using a coupled regional atmosphere and land surface model (WRF3-CLM3.5). Earth Interact 15:15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Meehl GA (2012) An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93:485–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USGS (2014) Snowmelt - The Water Cycle (available at http://water.usgs.gov/edu/watercyclesnowmelt.html). accessed on June 10, 2014

  • Wang S, Gillies RR, Takle ES, Gutowski WJ Jr (2009) Evaluation of precipitation in the Intermountain Region as simulated by the NARCCAP regional climate models. Geophys Res Lett 36:L11704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilby RL, Wigley TML, Conway D, Jones PD, Hewitson BC, Main J, Wilks DS (1998) Statistical downscaling of general circulation model output: a comparison of methods. Water Resour Res 34:2995–3008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood AW, Leung LR, Sridhar V, Lettenmaier DP (2004) Hydrologic implications of dynamical and statistical approaches to downscaling climate model outputs. Clim Change 62:189–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge our funding from Bureau of Reclamation (project No: R11AC81456 and R13AC80039) in support of this research. We thank the reviewers and editor for their helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, R., Wang, SY. & Gillies, R.R. A combined dynamical and statistical downscaling technique to reduce biases in climate projections: an example for winter precipitation and snowpack in the western United States. Theor Appl Climatol 124, 281–289 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-015-1415-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-015-1415-0

Keywords

Navigation