Resection frequency map after awake resective surgery for non-lesional neocortical epilepsy involving eloquent areas
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- Kim, YH., Kim, C.H., Kim, J.S. et al. Acta Neurochir (2011) 153: 1739. doi:10.1007/s00701-011-1074-6
- 513 Downloads
The resection of eloquent areas is challenging due to postoperative neurological deficits. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and risk of awake brain surgery for non-lesional epilepsy involving the eloquent areas or their adjacent areas and to advocate the generation of a resection frequency map.
We enrolled 55 patients who underwent awake surgery between 1994 and 2007 for non-lesional epilepsy involving the primary sensori-motor or language areas. All patients underwent two-staged operations including subdural electrode monitoring and awake resective surgery. For each case, the preoperative and postoperative images were spatially normalized and compared on a standard atlas, and the resection map was then computed by summing up each resected area on the atlas.
The postoperative seizure outcome was Engel class I in 27 patients (49.1%), II in nine (16.4%), III in 14 (25.5%) and IV in five (9.1%). Ten patients (18.2%) experienced postoperative neurological deficits including seven transient (12.7%) and three permanent, but mild ones (5.5%). The neurological complication rate of purely eloquent area resection was 36.8% (7/19). The resection frequency map computed in this study showed that the resection of eloquent areas was tolerable, with the exception of the Broca’s area.
Awake resective surgery with intraoperative brain mapping is an effective and safe treatment option for non-lesional epilepsy involving eloquent areas. The resection frequency map can show the resected area of a group as well as individuals and provide an objective measure of neurological risk.
KeywordsAwake surgeryNon-lesional epilepsyEloquent areaNeurological deficitResection frequency map
Although surgical resection of the epileptogenic zone is an effective treatment option for medically refractory localization-related epilepsy [17, 50], the resective surgery for the eloquent area is challenging because of the high risk of major postoperative neurological impairment [15, 30]. Consequently, series concerning the resection of the eloquent area have presented unacceptable rates of neurological complications or been limited in the number of the patients [3, 4, 10, 35, 36].
Recently, the increasing use of awake craniotomy under local anaesthesia for the management of brain tumours located in the eloquent brain revealed that this technique is associated with a low risk of new neurological impairment [9, 12, 18, 26, 28, 31, 34, 44, 47]. Although awake craniotomy, which is a useful but to some extent complicated technique, enables the maximal resection of various types of lesions (e.g. tumours and vascular malformations) without definite postoperative neurological morbidity, descriptions of awake brain surgery for non-lesional epilepsy (i.e. resection of the cortex associated with an epileptogenic zone in the eloquent cortices) are rare and limited [3, 4, 10].
Here, we present a selected series of 55 patients with non-lesional neocortical epilepsy involving the eloquent areas or their adjacent areas that underwent awake craniotomy with cortical mapping and resection under local anaesthesia. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and complications of awake brain surgery for non-lesional epilepsy involving the eloquent areas and to introduce the resection frequency map of the eloquent areas, which was computed by summing up the resection areas.
Patients and methods
Seventy-one patients underwent awake craniotomy under local anaesthesia for the treatment of non-lesional neocortical epilepsy associated with the eloquent area or its adjacent area between December 1994 and August 2007. In this study, the eloquent area was defined as cerebral cortices including the precentral gyrus, postcentral gyrus, supplementary motor area (SMA) and Broca’s area. All patients showed no definite lesions on 1.5-Tesla brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Patients had an epileptogenic focus located in the eloquent area, which required preresective subdural electrodes insertion and monitoring. Preoperative and postoperative MR images with a T1-weighted three-dimensional (3D) spoiled gradient (SPGR) were not available for all cases; therefore, this study was restricted to a subgroup of 55 patients (77.5% of the initial cohort).
Characteristics of the 55 patients recruited
Median age (years)
Type of seizure
Simple partial seizures
Complex partial seizures (CPS)
CPS & secondary generalization
Generalized tonic–clonic seizures
Central nervous system infection
Median duration of epilepsy (years)
Mean frequency of seizures (/month)
7 (1 to over 30)
Preoperative neurological deficit
The preoperative evaluation protocol included a routine history taking, physical and neurological examinations, prolonged interictal electroencephalography (EEG), ictal video-EEG monitoring (at least three usual seizures), brain MRI, positron emission tomography (PET) and interictal and ictal single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). The purpose of these preoperative studies was to localize an ictal onset zone, and the concordance of these studies enabled approximation of the epileptogenic zone. Additional functional evaluation included a Wada test, neuropsychological testing, functional MRI and magnetoencephalography (MEG), which were performed in selected patients. Subdural electrodes were implanted near the presumed ictal onset zone according to video-EEG monitoring results, as no definite lesion was apparent on the MRI of all patients. All the procedures for the insertion of the subdural electrodes were carried out under general anaesthesia. After implantation of the electrodes, video-electrocorticography monitoring was performed until at least three typical seizures occurred. After the ictal onset zone was delineated, extra-operative functional mapping (e.g. motor and language functions) was carried out via stimulation of the subdural electrodes.
Intraoperative cortical mapping
In the operating room, we paid attention to the patient’s positioning, which included neck comfort, transparent facial drape for continuous monitoring and access to the airway in case emergency intubation was required. A scalp nerve block was performed to the supraorbital nerve, supratrochlear nerve, auriculotemporal nerve, zygomaticotemporal nerve, greater auricular nerve and occipital nerve, using local anaesthetics that included a combination of 0.5% bupivacaine and epinephrine (1:200,000). Simultaneously, the same anaesthetics were injected around the expected pin sites, where the Mayfield head fixator was applied. No intravenous sedative agent (e.g. propofol) was administered until the end of the functional mapping and resection of whole regions of the target, to avoid patient confusion.
After the dura was opened, the resection area was estimated using the previously implanted subdural electrodes. Standard cortical mapping was performed by stimulation of the brain surface with the Ojemann stimulator [6, 38]. This is a constant current generator that produces a train of biphasic square-wave pulses (60 Hz, 1 ms/phase) to minimize the possibility of inducing a seizure. For the localization of the eloquent areas, the stimuli were applied in increments of 1 mA, starting at 1.5 mA up to a maximum of 6 mA for language cortices and 10 mA for motor cortices. A 1 × 4 subdural strip electrode was used both to ensure a stimulation artefact and to observe after-discharges. Epileptologists attended the whole process and monitored the patient during the cortical stimulation. Cortical areas that yielded a response on testing were labelled with small numbered paper tickets.
Awake cortical resection
After cortical stimulation, we resected the epileptogenic zone in or adjacent to the eloquent areas, except the areas eliciting definite thumb motor or speech arrest during cortical stimulation. During the resection, the patient was asked to do continuously the particular function at risk, such as continuous conversation around the language area or movement of a limb around the motor cortex. One epileptologist was assigned for monitoring the patient’s performance. We resected the epileptogenic zone as close as 1 cm from the speech arrest area or primary motor area especially controlling the thumb. Intraoperative stimulation to the cortex and white matter was undertaken intermittently during the resection. The resection continued until either the epileptogenic zone was removed or the onset of unexpected neurological deficits occurred. After the resection, language and motor function was tested intraoperatively.
All patients underwent regular follow-up at 1 month postoperatively and subsequently every 2–3 months, which was carried out by the same neurologist and neurosurgeon. The postoperative seizure outcome was assessed according to the classification of Engel . If possible, postoperative MR images were acquired three months after surgery (70.9%), as anatomical structures may be displaced or distorted on immediate postoperative images because of oedema or subdural fluid collection.
Resection frequency map
The preoperative and postoperative images that were available for the 55 recruited patients were used to prepare the resection frequency map of the eloquent cortices. We used T1-weighted sagittal 3D SPGR images with a thickness of 1.0 mm. All the preoperative and postoperative images were spatially normalized using the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) atlas and the SPM5 software (available at http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/software/spm5) of Matlab 7.0 (MathWorks, Natick, Mass.). All resected areas [i.e. regions of interest (ROIs)] were delineated manually on each preoperative MRI by comparison with each postoperative MRI using the MRIcro software (available at http://www.sph.sc.edu/comd/rorden/mricro.html). These analyses were carried out by experienced neurosurgeons (Y.-H.K. and C.H.K.). In this study, the preoperative MRI was used as the template to minimize the distortion of the postoperative MRI. We generated the resection frequency map by combining all ROIs together on an atlas using Matlab 7.0. As a result, 2D axial, coronal and sagittal images and 3D volume-rendering images were obtained using the MRIcron software (available at http://www.sph.sc.edu/comd/rorden/mricron).
The postoperative seizure outcome was Engel class I in 27 patients (49.1%), class II in nine patients (16.4%), class III in 14 patients (25.5%) and class IV in five patients (9.1%). In other words, the seizure-free rate was 49.1%, and the good seizure outcome (Engel classes I and II) rate was 65.5%. The duration of the follow-up of our patients was over 2 years (median, 72 months; range, 6–136 months), with the exception of five cases, which included three cases that were lost at follow-up.
Lobar distribution of the 55 patients
Thirty-five patients (63.6%) underwent focal corticectomy, 14 patients (25.5%) had near-total frontal lobectomy, and six patients (10.9%) underwent lateral temporal lobectomy. Pathological examination was performed in 51 cases, which revealed the presence of cortical dysplasia in 40 cases, cortical scar in five cases, contusion in two cases, ischemia in two cases, reactive gliosis in one case and encephalomalacia in one case. In the remaining four patients, pathological examination was not requested because all the tissue was suctioned away intra-operatively. The mean operation time, i.e. from the time of induction of anaesthesia to the closure of skin, was 300 min (range, 155–450 min). The mean postoperative hospital stay was 7 days (range, 3–24 days).
Postoperative neurological deficits and complications
Clinical data of the nine patients who underwent the resection of the primary sensori-motor cortices
Clinical data of the eight patients who underwent the resection of the SMA
In five cases (9.1%), we could not complete the continuous neurological monitoring because of poor patient cooperation; two patients (3.6%) had postoperative infections that required the removal of the infected bone flap, and 2two patients (3.6%) underwent additional surgery to remove postoperative hematomas.
Resection frequency map
Gyral distribution of the resected area and neurological outcome in 55 patients
PreCG & postCG
1(case 2 in Table 3)
PreCG & SMA
1 (case 4 in Table 3)
1 (case 8 in Table 3)
1 (case 10 in Table 4)
1 (case 17 in Table 4)
1 (case 21 in Table 5)
1 (case 19 in Table 5)
Adjacent area to PreCG
Adjacent area to PostCG
Adjacent area to Broca’s area
2(cases 20 & 22 in Table 5)
Adjacent area to Wernicke’s area
1 (case 25 in Table 5)
Epilepsy control via awake resective surgery
The surgical intervention for non-lesional epilepsy involving eloquent areas has been challenging due to difficulty in delineating the epileptogenic zone and neurological risk. Therefore, many authors advocate a treatment for non-lesional epilepsy involving the eloquent cortices that uses a combination of surgical procedures, multiple subpial transection (MST) and resection [16, 23, 43]. MST theoretically disrupts the horizontal connections between adjacent gyri via the placement of parallel cuts 5 mm apart in the eloquent cortex . It results in the interruption of the recruitment of the neural tissue necessary to produce a seizure, thus preventing damage to the eloquent cortices and minimizing the risk of development of neurological deficits. Actually MST can be considered as an alternative surgical option for incomplete epileptogenic zone resection. Recent data, however, revealed that MST has a relatively high relapse rate and another simple partial seizure risk [33, 46]. In this series, in which we used resection exclusively, without MST, 49.1% of the patients experienced a postoperative seizure-free state; moreover, we observed a decrease in seizure frequency and intensity of 90.9%. These results are excellent compared with previously reported results that did not involve the eloquent cortices [11, 24, 45]. We reported the largest (and first) successful series of awake resective surgery for non-lesional epilepsy induced from the eloquent areas or their adjacent areas.
Neurological efficacy of awake brain surgery
Previously, several authors reported the possibility of, and the risks associated with, resection of the primary sensori-motor area (i.e. the central lobule or the rolandic cortex) [35, 36]. Interestingly, studies pertaining to surgery in a particular region of the central lobule have been reported. Rasmussen  reported that resection of the proximal limb region is better tolerated than resection of the distal limb area. Lehman et al.  reported that unilateral excision of the lower central lobule, which controls the face area, is not associated with significant neurological impairment because of the bilateral cortical representation of the face. Recent reports showed that the resection of the rolandic cortices for treatment of medically intractable rolandic cortical epilepsy was effective for controlling of seizures and safe in terms of major neurological morbidities in child patients [3, 4].
In this study, four patients underwent the resection of the primary motor cortex (Table 3). The resection maps in Table 3 clearly show the specific region of the central lobule that was resected. Three patients underwent resection of the lower part of the precentral gyrus, which corresponds to the face and tongue motor area, and only one patient developed a permanent but mild dysarthria without difficulty in normal conversation (case 2 in Table 3). The remaining one patient underwent the resection of the limited anterior part of the precentral gyrus, which corresponds to the contralateral shoulder and upper arm motor function, and experienced transient upper extremity weakness with a full recovery 3 days after the operation (case 4 in Table 3). These results demonstrated that face or proximal limb area was relatively tolerable to post-resection neurological risk [27, 39].
A number of authors have reported an acceptable outcome after resection of the postcentral gyrus [1, 10, 25, 37]. Although the complete resection of the somatosensory cortex or of the area that controls the definite sensory function may result in permanent neurological deficits, the partial resection of these areas would only yield partial deficits, with a good potential for recovery. Only one out of the five patients who underwent the resection of the postcentral gyrus developed transient paraesthesia of contralateral hand; this patient had a full recovery (case 8 in Table 3). Two patients had excision of arm and face sensory areas without any sensory impairment (cases 5 and 7 in Table 3). No definite sensory function was detected in the resected area of the postcentral gyrus during the intraoperative functional monitoring of the remaining 2 patients (cases 6 and 9 in Table 3). These may result from the enhanced cortical plasticity present in epilepsy patients [21, 25]. Actually most of cases in the current series corresponded with cortical dysplasia, and functional reorganization and neural plasticity were the significant mechanisms enabling the eloquent area resections in this pathology .
It is well accepted that the removal of the unilateral SMA can be accomplished without significant permanent deficits, even though the SMA controls important functions, which include initiation of motor activity and speech . However, it is also well known that the removal of the SMA can cause transient neurological deficits, which include motor weakness or speech disturbance [2, 20, 41, 48, 51]. In the present study, eight patients underwent removal of the unilateral SMA (Table 4). Among these patients, two patients exhibited transient neurological morbidities including coordination disturbance of hand and motor weakness of contralateral leg (cases 10 and 17 in Table 4). Several factors, including the degree of resection of the SMA, injury of the cingulate gyrus and the nature of disease, could influence the degree of the neurological deficits after the removal of the SMA [2, 42, 51].
Studies on the excision of the language cortex without definite lesion are extremely rare and limited. A few reports describe the resection of the Broca’s area with definite lesion (e.g. brain tumour) [5, 13]. In the present study, two patients in the cohort underwent resection of the pars triangularis of the dominant hemisphere as a part of the Broca’s area (cases 19 and 21 in Table 5), which can be delineated using anatomical and MRI landmarks , and six patients that of its adjacent cortex (cases 11, 18, 20, 22, 23, and 24 in Table 5). The expressive language centres of the all the patients were preserved intraoperatively. Among them, four patients (50%), however, experienced the neurological deficits, including one permanent but mild motor dysphasia and three transient ones (cases 21, 19, 20, and 22 in Table 5). There was no case of the Wernicke’s area resection in our series (Table 6). Actually the estimated receptive language areas by intraoperative monitoring in some cases were located irregularly and more anteriorly compared to conventionally known Wernicke’s area [7, 14].
Therefore, our results showed that the resection of the Broca’s area is more prone to result in neurological deficits than the resection of any other brain area. Therefore, the pars triangularis and opercularis of the dominant hemisphere, which can be delineated as a part of the Broca’s area using anatomical and MRI landmarks , should not be excised carelessly, even if no definite function is detected in these two areas. However, the resections of the primary sensori-motor cortex or its adjacent area were neurologically tolerable, if the intraoperative monitoring of the motor function is done completely and thumb motor area is preserved. Consequently, pre-operative stimulations via subdural grids provided the spatial outline between the ictal onset zone and the functional area and peri-operative stimulation enabled to delineate the definite resection margin. Awake intraoperative monitoring was necessary to discriminate pure functional area from non-functional area and to avoid unexpected neurological risk.
Resection frequency map of the eloquent cortices
In this study, spatial normalization was used to integrate several individual imaging data of the 55 patients who underwent resection of the eloquent cortices. The spatial normalization of brain images, which included MRI, PET and SPECT, has been used mainly to infer brain function [8, 29]. There was no problem in the spatial normalization of non-distorted preoperative images. In contrast, the spatial normalization of postoperative images was controversial because of the mechanical displacement of the resected brain areas. Therefore, in this work, the delineation of the resected area of all cases was performed manually on the spatially normalized preoperative images by experienced neurosurgeons (Y.-H.K. and C.H.K.).
There are some significant advantages to the generation of the resection frequency map of the eloquent cortices presented here. Firstly, the resection frequency map gave objectivity to the results of the resective operation series. Consequently we could present the postoperative neurological results by functional categories, motor, sensory, Broca’s and Wernicke’s area. Secondly, 55 individual data regarding awake cortical resection of the eloquent cortices were integrated on the spatially normalized template. The resected area of the eloquent cortices could be delineated at a glance in this map. In particular, 3D volume-rendering images provided useful information for the treatment of epilepsy, as information from the cortex, (i.e. the surface of the brain) is more important than information from deeper structures (e.g. white matter). Thirdly, the resection frequency map can be used by neurosurgeons for the planning and performance of awake brain surgery of the eloquent cortex. Finally, the resection frequency map can be used in the future to verify the accuracy and error of preoperative functional studies, such as functional MRI, diffusion tensor MRI, PET, SPECT and MEG. The most accurate way to infer the function of particular brain regions is to excise these areas.
There are some limitations to this resection frequency map of the eloquent cortices. Firstly, the value of this map is not proportional; rather, this approach has additive value. For example, the resection of the area that was excised 11 times in this study does not mean that this area can be resected at a rate of 20.0% (11/55); rather, it merely means that this area was resected 11 times in the past. In the same manner, the presence of areas that were unresected does not imply that these areas should not be resected; it is merely a statement that the area was not resected in the current study. Secondly, the meaning of the disease category of this map should not be extrapolated to tumours, vascular malformations and other lesional epilepsy forms, as there are clear differences in the mechanisms of functional reorganization among these diseases [10, 40, 49]. The data used to generate this map were restricted to non-lesional epilepsy. Moreover, the causative lesions in epilepsy might be missed by 1.5-Tesla MRIs, especially performed in the early 1990s. Finally, this resection frequency map is subject to inherent technical difficulties that arise from the manual delineation of each resected area on an atlas and from the integration of each individual datum. To minimize these difficulties, experienced neurosurgeons (Y.-H.K. and C.H.K.) delineated all the ROIs manually and an additional experienced neurosurgeon (C.K.C.) examined each individual case in detail.
In conclusion, awake resective surgery under local anaesthesia with intraoperative functional mapping is an effective and safe treatment option for non-lesional neocortical epilepsy involving the eloquent areas or their adjacent areas. The resection frequency map showed that resection of the anatomically eloquent areas except for the Broca’s area was tolerable after complete intraoperative functional monitoring. The resection frequency map can show the resected area of a group as well as individuals and provide an objective measure of neurological risk.
This study was supported by a grant of the Korea Healthcare Technology R & D Project, Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs, Republic of Korea (A084368). This research was jointly supported by grants from the Brain Research Center of the 21st Century Frontier Research Program (2011K000284) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, the Republic of Korea.
Conflicts of interest
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.