European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 607–613

Percutaneous versus open repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures

  • Panagiotis K. Karabinas
  • Ioannis S. Benetos
  • Kalliopi Lampropoulou-Adamidou
  • Pavlos Romoudis
  • Andreas F. Mavrogenis
  • John Vlamis
Original Article

DOI: 10.1007/s00590-013-1350-7

Cite this article as:
Karabinas, P.K., Benetos, I.S., Lampropoulou-Adamidou, K. et al. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol (2014) 24: 607. doi:10.1007/s00590-013-1350-7

Abstract

Background

Controversy exists regarding the optimal treatment for acute Achilles tendon ruptures. Conservative and surgical treatments have been reported with variable results and complications rates. The purpose of this study is to compare the postoperative clinical and functional results of percutaneous versus open repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures.

Materials and methods

We present 34 patients with acute Achilles tendon ruptures treated with open and percutaneous surgical repair. There were 15 patients who had open surgical repair and 19 patients who had percutaneous repair. The mean follow-up was 22 months (range 10–24 months) for the open repair group and 20 months (range 9–24 months) for the percutaneous repair group; no patient was lost to follow-up. Postoperative rehabilitation was the same for both groups. Wound healing, complications, ankle range of motion, and patients’ return to work, activity level, weight-bearing, and subjective assessment of their treatment were recorded.

Results

No significant difference was observed with respect to any of the examined variables between the open and percutaneous repair groups. Tendon healing was observed in all patients of both groups by 7–9 weeks. The mean time of patients’ return to work was 7 weeks for the open repair group and 9 weeks for the percutaneous repair group. All patients were capable of full weight bearing by the 8th postoperative week time; the time to return to previous activities including non-contact sports was 5 months for both groups. All patients expressed satisfaction and graded their treatment as good. As expected, cosmetic appearance was significantly better in the percutaneous repair group. One patient who had open repair experienced skin incision pain and dysesthesia and graded his operation as fair. No patient experienced other complications such as re-rupture, infection, sural neuroma, or Achilles tendinitis within the period of this study.

Conclusions

The present study showed similarly successful clinical and functional results after both open and percutaneous repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures are similar. Cosmetic appearance is superior in the group of patients who had a percutaneous treatment.

Keywords

Achilles tendon rupturePercutaneous repairOpen repair

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Panagiotis K. Karabinas
    • 1
  • Ioannis S. Benetos
    • 1
  • Kalliopi Lampropoulou-Adamidou
    • 1
  • Pavlos Romoudis
    • 1
  • Andreas F. Mavrogenis
    • 2
  • John Vlamis
    • 1
  1. 1.Third Department of OrthopaedicsAthens University Medical SchoolAthensGreece
  2. 2.First Department of OrthopaedicsAthens University Medical School, Attikon University HospitalAthensGreece