Skip to main content
Log in

A morphometric analysis of contralateral neural foramen in TLIF

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Study design

A retrospective review

Purpose

This study was designed to compare postoperative changes in neural foramen between transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF).

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 67 patients was compared to the change of neural foraminal morphometry of the two techniques. 33 patients (40 levels) had TLIF and 34 patients (39 levels) had PLIF. The two groups had similar demographic profiles. Radiological parameters including anterior and posterior disc height, foraminal height (FH), and segmental Cobb angle (SCA) were measured by sagittally reconstructed computed tomography images before and after surgery. Cage position was designated as contralateral, middle, and ipsilateral in the TLIF group. Surgical results were assessed by Odom criteria, visual analog scale (VAS), and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores.

Results

The TLIF and PLIF group showed no bilateral difference in FH. The TLIF group had increased contralateral SCA compared to the ipsilateral side postoperatively. FH differed according to cage position in the TLIF group. When a cage was inserted deeply into the contralateral side, contralateral FH increased significantly. However, when a cage was inserted into the ipsilateral side, contralateral FH decreased significantly. Back pain was significantly lower in the TLIF group at 1 and 6 months than in the PLIF group. However, ODI and Odom scale scores were not different between the groups.

Conclusions

TLIF may induce uneven changes in foraminal morphometry. Cage position may be the major determinant of this result.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stonecipher T, Wright S (1989) Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with facet-screw fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 14:468–471

  2. Lowe TG, Tahernia AD, O’Brien MF, Smith DA (2002) Unilateral transforaminal posterior lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): indications, technique, and 2-year results. J Spinal Disord Tech 15:31–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Grob D (2009) Surgery for degenerative lumbar disease: transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 18:1991–1992. doi:10.1007/s00586-009-1222-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Humphreys SC, Hodges SD, Patwardhan AG, Eck JC, Murphy RB, Covington LA (2001) Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:567–571

  5. Yan DL, Pei FX, Li J, Soo CL (2008) Comparative study of PILF and TLIF treatment in adult degenerative spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 17:1311–1316. doi:10.1007/s00586-008-0739-1

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosenberg WS, Mummaneni PV (2001) Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: technique, complications, and early results. Neurosurgery 48:569–574 (discussion 574–565)

  7. Hunt T, Shen FH, Shaffrey CI, Arlet V (2007) Contralateral radiculopathy after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 16(Suppl 3):311–314. doi:10.1007/s00586-007-0387-x

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Harms J, Rolinger H (1982) A one-stager procedure in operative treatment of spondylolistheses: dorsal traction-reposition and anterior fusion (author’s transl). Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 120:343–347. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1051624

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Foley KT, Lefkowitz MA (2002) Advances in minimally invasive spine surgery. Clin Neurosurg 49:499–517

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin PM (1977) A technical modification of Cloward’s posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurgery 1:118–124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Evans JH (1985) Biomechanics of lumbar fusion. Clin Orthop Relat Res (193):38–46

  12. Voor MJ, Mehta S, Wang M, Zhang YM, Mahan J, Johnson JR (1998) Biomechanical evaluation of posterior and anterior lumbar interbody fusion techniques. J Spinal Disord 11:328–334

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Steffee AD, Sitkowski DJ (1988) Posterior lumbar interbody fusion and plates. Clin Orthop Relat Res 227:99–102

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hsieh PC, Koski TR, O’Shaughnessy BA, Sugrue P, Salehi S, Ondra S, Liu JC (2007) Anterior lumbar interbody fusion in comparison with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: implications for the restoration of foraminal height, local disc angle, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal balance. J Neurosurg Spine 7:379–386. doi:10.3171/spi-07/10/379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hasegawa T, An HS, Haughton VM, Nowicki BH (1995) Lumbar foraminal stenosis: critical heights of the intervertebral discs and foramina. A cryomicrotome study in cadavera. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:32–38

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Xu H, Ju W, Xu N, Zhang X, Zhu X, Zhu L, Qian X, Wen F, Wu W, Jiang F (2013) Biomechanical comparison of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with one or two cages by finite element analysis. Neurosurgery. doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000430320.39870.f7

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tsuang YH, Chiang YF, Hung CY, Wei HW, Huang CH, Cheng CK (2009) Comparison of cage application modality in posterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior instrumentation–a finite element study. Med Eng Phys 31:565–570. doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.11.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Iwata T, Miyamoto K, Hioki A, Fushimi K, Ohno T, Shimizu K (2013) Morphological changes in contralateral lumbar foramen in unilateral cantilever transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using kidney-type intervertebral spacers. J Spinal Disord Tech. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e318286bb14

    Google Scholar 

  19. Anand N, Hamilton JF, Perri B, Miraliakbar H, Goldstein T (2006) Cantilever TLIF with structural allograft and RhBMP2 for correction and maintenance of segmental sagittal lordosis: long-term clinical, radiographic, and functional outcome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:E748–E753. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000240211.23617.ae

  20. Dimar JR 2nd, Glassman SD, Vemuri VM, Esterberg JL, Howard JM, Carreon LY (2011) Lumbar lordosis restoration following single-level instrumented fusion comparing 4 commonly used techniques. Orthopedics 34:e760–e764. doi:10.3928/01477447-20110922-14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dong-Su Jang, B.A. (Research Assistant, Department of Anatomy, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea), for his help with the figures. No funds were received in support of this work. No benefits in any form have been or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

PGC: nothing to disclose. SHP: nothing to disclose. BJM: nothing to disclose. KNK: nothing to disclose. YH: nothing to disclose. DHY: nothing to disclose. DSJ: nothing to disclose. DAS: nothing to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong Ah Shin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cho, P.G., Park, S.H., Kim, K.N. et al. A morphometric analysis of contralateral neural foramen in TLIF. Eur Spine J 24, 783–790 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3783-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3783-7

Keywords

Navigation