Laminarthrectomy as a surgical approach for decompressing the spinal canal: assessment of preoperative versus postoperative dural sac cross-sectional areal (DSCSA)
- Erland HermansenAffiliated withDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Ålesund Hospital, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust Email author
- , Gunnar MoenAffiliated withRadiologic Department, Haukeland University Hospital
- , Johan BarstadAffiliated withÅlesund Hospital, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust
- , Rune BirketvedtAffiliated withKysthospitalet in Hagevik, Orthopedic Clinic, Haukeland University Hospital
- , Kari IndrekvamAffiliated withKysthospitalet in Hagevik, Orthopedic Clinic, Haukeland University HospitalDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Bergen
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is today the most frequently performed procedure in the adult lumbar spine. Long-term benefit of surgery for LSS is well documented both in randomized and in non-randomized trials. In this paper, we present the results from laminarthrectomy as an alternative surgical approach, which have theoretical advantages over other approaches. In this study, we wanted to study the clinical and radiological results of laminarthrectomy. Dural sac cross-sectional areal (DSCSA) is an objective method to quantify the degree of central stenosis in the spinal canal, and was used to measure whether we were able to achieve an adequate decompression of the spinal canal with laminarthrectomy as a surgical approach.
Materials and methods
All patients operated on with this approach consecutively in the period 1 January 2008 to 31 March 2009 were included in the study. All perioperative complications were noted. Clinical results were measured by means of a questionnaire. The patients that agreed to attend the study had an MRI taken of the operated level. DSCSA before and after surgery of the actual level were measured by three observers. We then performed a correlation test between increase of area and clinical results. We also tested for inter- and intra-observer reability.
Fifty-six laminarthrectomy were performed. There were 17 % complications, none of them were life-threatening or disabling. 46 patients attended the study and answered the questionnaire. Thirty-four patients (83 %) reported clinical improvement, whereas six (13 %) patients reported no improvement, and two (4 %) patients reported that they were worse. Mean ODI was 23.0. Mean EQ-5D was 0.77. Mean VAS-score for back-pain was 3.1 and mean VAS-score for leg-pain was 2.8. Mean DSCSA were measured to 80 mm2 before surgery and 161 mm2 after surgery. That gave an increase of DSCSA of 81 mm2 (101 %). We found a significant positive correlation between increase of area and clinical results. We also found consistent inter- and intra-observer reability.
In this study, the clinical results of laminarthrectomy were good, and comparable with other reports for LSS. The rates of complications are also comparable with other reports in spinal surgery. A significant increase in the spinal canal diameter was achieved. Within the limitations a retrospective study gives, we conclude that laminarthrectomy seems to be a safe and effective surgical approach for significant decompressing the adult central spinal canal, and measurement of DSCSA, before and after surgery seems to be a good way to quantify the degree of decompression.
KeywordsLaminarthrectomy Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) Dural sac cross-sectional areal (DSCSA)
- Laminarthrectomy as a surgical approach for decompressing the spinal canal: assessment of preoperative versus postoperative dural sac cross-sectional areal (DSCSA)
European Spine Journal
Volume 22, Issue 8 , pp 1913-1919
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Additional Links
- Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS)
- Dural sac cross-sectional areal (DSCSA)
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ålesund Hospital, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway
- 2. Radiologic Department, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- 3. Ålesund Hospital, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway
- 4. Kysthospitalet in Hagevik, Orthopedic Clinic, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- 5. Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway