Skip to main content
Log in

Instrumented fusion of thoracolumbar fracture with type I mineralized collagen matrix combined with autogenous bone marrow as a bone graft substitute: a four-case report

  • Case Report
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to avoid the morbidity from autogenous bone harvesting, bone graft substitutes are being used more frequently in spinal surgery. There is indirect radiological evidence that bone graft substitutes are efficacious in humans. The purpose of this four-case study was to visually, manually, and histologically assess the quality of a fusion mass produced by a collagen hydroxyapatite scaffold impregnated with autologous bone marrow aspirate for posterolateral fusion. Four patients sustained an acute thoracolumbar fracture and were treated by short posterior segment fusion using the AO fixateur interne. Autologous bone marrow (iliac crest) impregnated hydroxyapatite-collagen scaffold was laid on the decorticated posterior elements. Routine implant removal was performed after a mean of 15.3 months (12–20). During this second surgery, fusion mass was assessed visually and manually. A bone biopsy was sent for histological analysis of all four cases. Fusion was confirmed in all four patients intraoperatively and sagittal stress testing confirmed mechanical adequacy of the fusion mass. Three out of the four (cases 2–4) had their implants removed between 12 and 15 months after the index surgery. All their histological cuts showed evidence of newly formed bone and presence of active membranous and/or enchondral ossification foci. The last patient (case 1) underwent implant removal at 20 months and his histological cuts showed mature bone, but no active ossification foci. This four-case report suggests that the fusion mass produced by a mineralized collagen matrix graft soaked in aspirated bone marrow is histologically and mechanically adequate in a thoracolumbar fracture model. A larger patient series and/or randomized controlled studies are warranted to confirm these initial results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  1. Acocella A, Nardi P, Tedesco A et al (2003) Anterior iliac bone grafts: techniques and sequelae. Report on 107 cases and review of the literature. Minerva Stomatol 52:441–453

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Banwart JC, Asher MA, Hassanein RS (1995) Iliac crest bone graft harvest donor site morbidity. A statistical evaluation. Spine 20:1055–60.3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Blumenthal SL, Gill K (1993) Can lumbar spine radiographs accurately determine fusion in postoperative patients? Correlation of routine radiographs with a second surgical look at lumbar fusions. Spine 18:1186–1189

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bridwell KH, O’Brien MF, Lenke LG et al (1994) Posterior spinal fusion supplemented with only allograft bone in paralytic scoliosis. Does it work? Spine 19:2658–2666

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brodsky AE, Kovalsky ES, Khalil MA (1991) Correlation of radiologic assessment of lumbar spine fusions with surgical exploration. Spine 16:S261–S265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Christensen FB, Laursen M, Gelineck J et al (2001) Interobserver and intraobserver agreement of radiograph interpretation with and without pedicle screw implants: the need for a detailed classification system in posterolateral spinal fusion. Spine 26:538–544

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Connolly JF, Guse R, Tiedeman J et al (1991) Autologous marrow injection as a substitute for operative grafting of tibial nonunions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 266:259–270

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Connolly JF, Guse R, Tiedeman J et al (1989) Autologous marrow injection for delayed unions of the tibia: a preliminary report. J Orthop Trauma 3:276–282

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dick W, Kluger P, Magerl F et al (1985) A new device for internal fixation of thoracolumbar and lumbar spine fractures: the ‘fixateur interne’. Paraplegia 23:225–232

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fernyhough JC, Schimandle JJ, Weigel MC et al (1992) Chronic donor site pain complicating bone graft harvesting from the posterior iliac crest for spinal fusion. Spine 17:1474–1480

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Garg NK, Gaur S (1995) Percutaneous autogenous bone-marrow grafting in congenital tibial pseudarthrosis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 77:830–831

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Grogan DP, Kalen V, Ross TI et al (1999) Use of allograft bone for posterior spinal fusion in idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Orthop 369:273–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gustilo RB, Anderson JT (1976) Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 58:453–458

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gustilo RB, Mendoza RM, Williams DN (1984) Problems in the management of type III (severe) open fractures: a new classification of type III open fractures. J Trauma 24:742–746

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Heary RF, Schlenk RP, Sacchieri TA et al (2002) Persistent iliac crest donor site pain: independent outcome assessment. Neurosurgery 50:510–517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Issack PS, DiCesare PE (2003) Recent advances toward the clinical application of bone morphogenetic proteins in bone and cartilage repair. Am J Orthop 32:429–436

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jones KC, Andrish J, Kuivila T et al (2002) Radiographic outcomes using freeze-dried cancellous allograft bone for posterior spinal fusion in pediatric idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 22:285–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jorgenson SS, Lowe TG, France J et al (1994) A prospective analysis of autograft versus allograft in posterolateral lumbar fusion in the same patient. A minimum of 1-year follow-up in 144 patients. Spine 19:2048–2053

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kitchel S (2006) A preliminary comparative study of radiographic results using mineralized collagen and bone marrow aspirate vs. autologous bone in the same patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion with instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion. Spine J (in press)

  20. Kitchel S (2005) A prospective study of mineralized collagen and bone marrow aspirate as a bone graft substitute in instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusions: 1 and 2 year follow-up. Presented at the 20th annual meeting of the AANS/CNS section on disorders of the spine and peripheral nerves. Phoenix, Arizona

  21. Kraiwattanapong C, Boden SD, Louis-Ugbo J et al (2005) Comparison of Healos/bone marrow to INFUSE(rhBMP-2/ACS) with a collagen-ceramic sponge bulking agent as graft substitutes for lumbar spine fusion. Spine 30:1001–1007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lindsey RW, Dick W (1991) The fixateur interne in the reduction and stabilization of thoracolumbar spine fractures in patients with neurologic deficit. Spine 16:S140–S145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD et al (1994) A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J 3:184–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Muschler GF, Boehm C, Easley K (1997) Aspiration to obtain osteoblast progenitor cells from human bone marrow: the influence of aspiration volume. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 79:1699–1709

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Muschler GF, Nitto H, Matsukura Y et al (2003) Spine fusion using cell matrix composites enriched in bone marrow-derived cells. Clin Orthop Relat Res 407:102–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Robertson PA, Wray AC (2001) Natural history of posterior iliac crest bone graft donation for spinal surgery: a prospective analysis of morbidity. Spine 26:1473–1476

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sandhu HS, Khan SN, Suh DY et al (2001) Demineralized bone matrix, bone morphogenetic proteins, and animal models of spine fusion: an overview. Eur Spine J 10 (Suppl 2):S122–S131

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Takagi K, Urist MR (1982) The role of bone marrow in bone morphogenetic protein-induced repair of femoral massive diaphyseal defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res 171:224-231

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tay BK, Le AX, Heilman M et al (1998) Use of a collagen-hydroxyapatite matrix in spinal fusion. A rabbit model. Spine 23:2276–2281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Thalgott JS, Fritts K, Giuffre JM et al (1999) Anterior interbody fusion of the cervical spine with coralline hydroxyapatite. Spine 24:1295–1299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Thalgott JS, Giuffre JM, Fritts K et al (2001) Instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion using coralline hydroxyapatite with or without demineralized bone matrix, as an adjunct to autologous bone. Spine J 1:131–137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Thalgott JS, Giuffre JM, Klezl Z et al (2002a) Anterior lumbar interbody fusion with titanium mesh cages, coralline hydroxyapatite, and demineralized bone matrix as part of a circumferential fusion. Spine J 2:63–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Thalgott JS, Klezl Z, Timlin M et al (2002b) Anterior lumbar interbody fusion with processed sea coral (coralline hydroxyapatite) as part of a circumferential fusion. Spine 27:E518–E527

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio A. Faundez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Faundez, A.A., Taylor, S. & Kaelin, A.J. Instrumented fusion of thoracolumbar fracture with type I mineralized collagen matrix combined with autogenous bone marrow as a bone graft substitute: a four-case report. Eur Spine J 15 (Suppl 5), 630–635 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0162-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0162-4

Keywords

Navigation