Abstract
In a finite system like the earth economical use and preservation of resources is mandatory. The aspiration to fulfil the demand of an increasing population with raised standards of living and to generate on-going economic growth leads to certain dilemmas concerning material resources. The paper will elaborate on the differences of economics with relatively scarce resources and economics with absolutely scarce resources with a focus on material resources. Currently many sustainability initiatives try to solve the problem of scarce resources by increasing efficiency. But general economic principles which increase efficiency such as economies of scale and learning curve effects demand high quantities and high lot sizes. Thus, efficiency in an economic sense does not always mean resource efficiency, which should not only include material efficiency but also preservation of resource availability and resource stewardship. If sustainability research takes the definition of the Brundtland report seriously and wants to meet “the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs” then in the long run there needs to be a shift to renewable resources. This shift leads to new problems concerning overuse and tragedy of the commons as well as competition for acreage. The paper argues that sustainability research needs to change its focus from a mere increase of material efficiency to the problems of resource stewardship and preservation of natural resources taking a system dynamics perspective. It will elaborate on some of the possible directions these more wide-spread approaches may lead to.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albert M (2015) Gegensätze der Nachhaltigkeit. Working Paper 4‑1 Working Papers of the Chair for Innovation Research and Technology Management (BWL IX). TU Chemnitz, Chemnitz
Altvater, E (2015a) Der Grundwiderspruch des 21. Jahrhunderts. In: Le Monde diplomatique (ed.) Atlas der Globalisierung. Taz, Berlin, 16–19
Altvater, E (2015b) Das Erdzeitlater des Kapitals. In: Le Monde diplomatique (ed.) Atlas der Globalisierung. Taz, Berlin, 44–47
Arrow K, Dasgupta P, Goulder L, Daily G, Ehrlich P, Heal G, Levin S, Mäler K‑G, Schneider S, Starrett D, Walker B (2004) Are we consuming too much? J Econ Perspect 18(3):147–172
Bartlett AA (2012) The meaning of sustainability. Teach Clgh Sci Soc Educ Newsl 31(1):1–17
Berger R (2012) Mastering product complexity. https://www.rolandberger.de/media/pdf/Roland_Berger_Master_product_complexity_20121108.pdf. Accessed 23. Jun 2016
Bpb = Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung (2014) Entwicklung des grenzüberschreitenden Warenhandels. http://www.bpb.de/nachschlagen/zahlen-und-fakten/globalisierung/52543/entwicklung-des-warenhandels. Accessed 17. Dez 2014
Braungart M, McDonough W (2009) Cradle to cradle: re-making the way we make things. Vintage Books, New York
Cachon G, Terwiesch C (2012) Matching supply with demand: an introduction to operations management. McGraw Hill, Boston
Chertow MR (2001) The IPAT equation and its variants. Changing views of technology and environmental impact. J Ind Ecol 4(4):13–29
Chopra S, Meindl P (2013) Supply chain management. strategy, planning, and operation, 5th edn. Pearson, Harlow
Commoner B (1972) A bulletin dialogue on “the closing circle”: response. Bull At Sci 28(5):17, 42–56
Commoner B, Corr M, Stamler PJ (1971) The closing circle: nature, man, and technology. Knopf, New York
Constanza R, Ruth M (1998) Using dynamic modeling to scope environmental problems and build consensus. Environ Manage 22(2):183–195
Dahmus JB (2014) Can efficiency improvements reduce resource consumption? A historical analysis of ten activities. J Ind Ecol 18(6):883–897
Daily GC, Ehrlich PR (1992) Population, sustainability, and earth’s carrying capacity. Bioscience 42(10):761–771
Daniels P, Bradshaw M, Shaw D, Sidaway J (2012) An introduction to human geography, 4th edn. Pearson, Harlow
Deckert C (2015) Nachhaltige Logistik. Verbesserte Ressourcennutzung und Umweltverträglichkeit durch Green Logistics und City-Logistik. In: Deckert C (ed) CSR & Logistik. Spannungsfelder Green Logistics und City Logistik. Springer, Berlin
Deckert C, Fröhlich E (2014) Green Logistics: Framework zur Steigerung der logistischen Nachhaltigkeit. Suppl Chain Manag II/2014(2014):13–18
Dietz T, Rosa EA (1994) Rethinking the environmental impacts of population, affluence and technology. Hum Ecol Rev 1:277–300
Dietz T, Rosa EA, York R (2012) Environmentally efficient well-being: is there a Kuznets curve? Appl Geogr 32(2012):21–28
Ehrlich PR, Holdren JP (1971) Impact of population growth. Science 171(3977):1212–1217
Ehrlich PR, Holdren JP (1972) A bulletin dialogue on “the closing circle”: critique. Bull At Sci 28(5):16, 18–27
Ehrlich PR, Ehrlich AH, Holdren JP (1975) Humanökologie. Springer, Berlin u. a.
Forrester JW (2013) Industrial dynamics. Martino Publishing, Mansfield Centre
Gans O, Jöst F (2005) Decomposing the impact of population growth on environmental deterioration. Discussion Paper Series, vol. 422. University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg
Hardin G (1968) Tragedy of the commones. Science 162:1243–1248
Hartwig K‑H (2007) Umweltökonomie. In: Bender D et al (ed) Vahlens Kompendium der Wirtschaftstheorie und Wirtschaftspolitik, 7th edn. Vahlen, München, pp 129–170
Heck S, Rogers M, Carroll P (2014) Resource revolution. How to capture the biggest business opportunity in a century. Amazon Publishing, Seattle
Heizer J, Render B (2014) Principles of operations management. Sustainability and supply chain management, 9th edn. Pearson, Harlow
Holm S‑O, Englund G (2008) Increased ecoefficiency and gross rebound effect: evidence from USA and six European countries 1960–2002. Soc Econ 68(2009):879–887
Kanning H (2013) Nachhaltige Entwicklung – Die gesellschaftliche Herausforderung für das 21. Jahrhundert. In: Baumast A, Pape J (eds) Betriebliches Nachhaltigkeitsmanagement. Ulmer, Stuttgart, pp 21–43
Kranert M, Cord-Landwehr K (2010) Einführung in die Abfallwirtschaft, 4th edn. Vieweg+Teubner, Wiesbaden
Martens H (2011) Recyclingtechnik. Fachbuch für Lehre und Praxis. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg
Meadows D, Meadows D (1972) The limits to growth. A report for the club of rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. Universe Publishing, New York
Meyer WB (1996) Human impact on the earth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Müller-Christ G (2014) Nachhaltiges Management: Einführung in Ressourcenorientierung und widersprüchliche Managementrationalitäten. UTB, Nomos, Baden-Baden
Nentwig W (2005) Humanökologie. Fakten – Argumente – Ausblicke, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin u. a
Paech N (2012) Befreiung vom Überfluss. Auf dem Weg in die Postwachstumsökonomie. oekom, München
Polimeni JM (2008) Empirical evidence for the Jevons paradox. In: Polimeni JM, Mayumi K, Giampietro M, Alcott B (eds) The Jevons paradox and the myth of resource efficiency improvements. Earthscan, London
Porter ME (1998) Competitive strategy. Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press, New York
Pufé I (2012) Nachhaltigkeit. UTB, Konstanz
Reuter M (2007) Methodik der Werkstoffauswahl. Der systematische Weg zum richtigen Material. Hanser, München
Ruth M, Hannon B (2012) Modeling dynamic economic systems (modeling dynamic systems). Springer, Berlin
Santarius T (2012) Green growth unravelled. How rebound effects baffle sustainability targets when the economy keeps growing. Heinrich Böll Foundation, Berlin
Santarius, T (2015) Umweltfreundlich mehr verbrauchen. In: Le Monde diplomatique (ed.) Atlas der Globalisierung. Taz, Berlin, 56–57
Schettkat R (2009) Analyzing rebound effects. Wuppertal Papers, vol. 177. Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy, Wuppertal, ISSN 0949–5266
Schwister K (2010) Taschenbuch der Umwelttechnik, 2nd edn. Hanser, Leipzig
Scott JC (1998) Seeing like a state. How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press, New Haven London
Senge PM, Smith B, Kruschwitz N, Laur J, Schley S (2008) The necessary revolution. How individuals and organisations are working together to create a sustainable world. Doubleday, New York
Sinding-Larsen R, Wellmer F‑W (2012) Non-renewable resource issues: geoscientific and societal challenges: an introduction. In: Sinding-Larsen R, Wellmer F‑W (eds) Non-renewable resource issues: geoscientific and societal challenges. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–19
Sorrell S (2010) Mapping rebound effects from sustainable behaviours. Key concepts and literature review. SLRG Working Paper 01-10 (ISSN: 2050-4446). http://www.sustainablelifestyles.ac.uk/sites/default/files/publicationsdocs/slrg_working_paper_01-10.pdf. Accessed 22 Jun 2016
Sterman JD (2000) Business dynamics: system thinking and modeling for a complex world. McGraw Hill, Boston
Tenner E (1997) Why things bite back: technology and the revenge of unintended consequences. Vintage Books, New York
UN = United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2014) World urbanization prospects: the 2014 revision, highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/352). UN, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, New York
UN = United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2015) World population prospects: the 2015 revision, key findings and advance tables. Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP.241
UNDP = United Nations Development Programme (2014) Human development report 2014 – sustaining human progress: reducing vulnerabilities and building resilience
Waggoner PE, Ausubel JH (2002) A framework for sustainability science: a renovated IPAT identity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99(12):375–390
WCED = World Commission on Environment and Development (1988) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Wellmer F‑W (2012) Discovery and sustainability. In: Sinding-Larsen R, Wellmer F‑W (eds) Non-renewable resource issues: geoscientific and societal challenges. Springer, Berlin, pp 35–43
Wellmer F‑W, Steinbach V (2011) Is a road to sustainable use of non-renewable mineral raw materials possible? Proceedings Conference Sustainable Development in the Minerals Industry (SDIMI), Aachen, Jun 2011, pp 14–17
Weston RF, Ruth M (1997) A dynamic, hierarchical approach to understanding and managing natural economic systems. Ecol Econ 21(1997):1–17
Willke G (2006) Pocket Wirtschaft. Ökonomische Grundbegriffe, 2nd edn. bpb, Bonn
World Bank (2016a) Birth rate, crude (per 1,000 people). http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.CBRT.IN. Accessed 01 Jul 2016
World Bank (2016b) Fertility rate, total (births per woman). http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.TFRT.IN/. Accessed 01 Jul 2016
World Bank (2016c) GDP growth (annual %). http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG. Accessed 30 Jun 2016
Yellishetty M, Haque N, Dubreuil A (2012) Issues and challenges in life cycle assessment in the minerals and metals sector: a chance to improve raw materials efficiency. In: Sinding-Larsen R, Wellmer F‑W (eds) Non-renewable resource issues: geoscientific and societal challenges. Springer, Berlin, pp 229–246
York R, Rosa EA, Dietz T (2003) STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: Analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecol Econ 46(2003):351–365
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Deckert, C. Ecological sustainability of material resources – Why material efficiency just isn’t enough. uwf 24, 325–335 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00550-016-0419-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00550-016-0419-2