Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 20, Issue 8, pp 1805–1810

Implementation of institutional antiemetic guidelines for low emetic risk chemotherapy with docetaxel: a clinical and cost evaluation

Authors

  • Toshinobu Hayashi
    • Department of PharmacyNational Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center
    • Department of PharmacyKyushu University Hospital
  • Taito Esaki
    • Department of Medical OncologyNational Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center
  • Mami Fukazawa
    • Department of PharmacyNational Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center
  • Motoaki Abe
    • Department of PharmacyNational Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center
  • Shinji Ohno
    • Department of Breast OncologyNational Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center
  • Tatsuru Tomizawa
    • Department of PharmacyNational Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center
  • Ryozo Oishi
    • Department of PharmacyKyushu University Hospital
Original Article

DOI: 10.1007/s00520-011-1278-6

Cite this article as:
Hayashi, T., Ikesue, H., Esaki, T. et al. Support Care Cancer (2012) 20: 1805. doi:10.1007/s00520-011-1278-6

Abstract

Purpose

The purposes of this study were to evaluate the effect of implementation of institutional guidelines for low emetic risk chemotherapy with docetaxel and estimate the cost saving for all low emetic risk chemotherapies.

Methods

We examined the clinical effect of preparing and implementing institutional antiemetic guidelines for the breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant docetaxel therapy. Although the antiemetic medication for such patients used to be ondansetron 4 mg plus dexamethasone 8 mg (OND + DEX), it was changed to dexamethasone (DEX) 12 mg alone after implementation of the institutional guidelines. The effectiveness and adverse effects of DEX alone (56 patients, 205 courses) were compared with those of OND + DEX (41 patients, 151 courses). The cost saving was calculated from the antiemetic costs in both groups. The annual cost saving was estimated from the number of all low emetic risk chemotherapies in a year.

Results

The incidences of nausea (19.5% versus 16.1%), vomiting (2.4% versus 0%), constipation (34.1% versus 30.4%), and insomnia (17.1% versus 17.9%) were not significantly different between the OND + DEX group and DEX alone group. In all low emetic risk chemotherapies, US $78,883 of potential cost saving was estimated in the first year after changing the antiemetic treatment.

Conclusion

The present results suggest that DEX alone is equally effective for preventing nausea and vomiting and less expensive compared with a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist plus DEX in low emetic risk chemotherapy with docetaxel.

Keywords

Low emetic risk chemotherapyDocetaxelAntiemeticsDexamethasoneCost-minimization analysis

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011