Supportive Care International

Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 17, Issue 10, pp 1247-1254

First online:

Administrators’ perspectives on end-of-life care for cancer patients in Japanese long-term care facilities

  • Hiroki FukahoriAffiliated withDepartment of System Management in Nursing, Graduate School of Health Care Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Email author 
  • , Mitsunori MiyashitaAffiliated withDepartment of Adult Nursing/Palliative Care Nursing, School of Health Sciences and Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo
  • , Tatsuya MoritaAffiliated withDepartment of Palliative and Supportive Care, Palliative Care Team, and Seirei Hospice, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital
  • , Takayuki IchikawaAffiliated withDepartment of Adult Nursing/Palliative Care Nursing, School of Health Sciences and Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo
  • , Nobuya AkizukiAffiliated withPsycho-Oncology Division, Research Center for Innovative Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East
  • , Miki AkiyamaAffiliated withFaculty of Policy Management, Keio University
  • , Yutaka ShirahigeAffiliated withShirahige Clinic
  • , Kenji EguchiAffiliated withDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Oncology, Teikyo University School of Medicine

Rent the article at a discount

Rent now

* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.

Get Access



The purpose of this study was to clarify administrators’ perspectives on availability of recommended strategies for end-of-life (EOL) care for cancer patients at long-term care (LTC) facilities in Japan.


A cross-sectional survey was conducted with administrators at Japanese LTC facilities. Participants were surveyed about their facilities, reasons for hospitalization of cancer patients, and their perspectives on availability of and strategies for EOL care.


The 97 responses were divided into medical facility (n = 24) and non-medical facility (n = 73) groups according to physician availability. The most frequent reasons for hospitalization were a sudden change in patient’s condition (49.4%), lack of around-the-clock care (43.0%), and inability to palliate symptoms (41.0%). About 50% of administrators believed their facilities could provide EOL care if supported by palliative care experts. There was no significant difference between facility types (P = 0.635). Most administrators (81.2%) regarded unstable cancer patients as difficult to care for. However, many (68.4%) regarded opioids given orally as easy to administer, but regarded continuous subcutaneous infusion/central venous nutrition as difficult. Almost all administrators believed the most useful strategy was transferring patients to hospitals at the request of patients or family members (96.9%), followed by consultation with palliative care experts (88.5%).


Although LTC facilities in Japan currently do not provide adequate EOL care for cancer patients, improvement might be possible with support by palliative care teams. Appropriate models are necessary for achieving a good death for cancer patients. Interventions based on these models are necessary for EOL care for cancer patients in LTC facilities.


Palliative care Administrators Long-term care facilities Cancer care