Original Article

Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 451-460

First online:

Use of a lidocaine patch in the management of postsurgical neuropathic pain in patients with cancer: a phase III double-blind crossover study (N01CB)

  • Andrea L. ChevilleAffiliated withMayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation
  • , Jeff A. SloanAffiliated withMayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation
  • , Donald W. NorthfeltAffiliated withMayo Clinic Scottsdale
  • , Anand P. JillellaAffiliated withMedical College of Georgia
  • , Gilbert Y. WongAffiliated withMayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation
  • , James D. Bearden IIIAffiliated withUpstate Carolina CCOP
  • , Heshan LiuAffiliated withMayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation
  • , Paul L. SchaeferAffiliated withToledo Community Hospital Oncology Program CCOP
  • , Benjamin T. MarchelloAffiliated withMontana Cancer Consortium
    • , Bradley J. ChristensenAffiliated withMayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation
    • , Charles L. LoprinziAffiliated withMayo Clinic and Mayo FoundationMayo Clinic Email author 

Rent the article at a discount

Rent now

* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.

Get Access



Current therapies often have limited efficacy and untenable side effects when used to treat persistent incisional pain following cancer-related surgery. Lidocaine patches reduce neuropathic pain from herpes zoster but their benefits for persistent cancer-related postsurgical incisional pain remain unclear.

Study design

Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, two-period crossover trial.

Materials and methods

Twenty-eight cancer patients with postsurgical incisional pain were randomly assigned to receive either lidocaine patches followed by placebo patches or the reverse. Each study period lasted 4 weeks. Patches were applied daily upon waking and left in place for a maximum of 18 h. The primary outcome measure, an 11-point pain intensity rating scale, was administered weekly. Secondary outcomes were administered weekly (Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form(BPI-SF), Subject Global Impression of Change) and at the end of each study period (Short Form-Magill Pain Questionnaire, Linear Analogue Self Assessment Scale, Neuropathy Pain Scale, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Profile of Mood States Short Form).


Twenty-one patients completed the first period and 18 completed their crossover second phase. No significant intergroup differences were detected in pain intensity ratings. Few secondary end points were significantly different when subjects used the lidocaine versus placebo patches. BPI-SF interference scores were lower in patients using the lidocaine patch during the first study period, including several scores that achieved statistical significance, general activity (p = 0.02), work (p = 0.04), and relations with others (p = 0.02).


Lidocaine patch use did not significantly reduce pain intensity ratings or the majority of related secondary end points in cancer patients with persistent incisional pain.


Lidocaine patch Postsurgical neuropathic pain Cancer Cancer-related pain