Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 11, Issue 8, pp 516–521

Randomized double-blind study of the Reliefband as an adjunct to standard antiemetics in patients receiving moderately-high to highly emetogenic chemotherapy

Authors

  • Imad Treish
    • University of North Carolina Hospitals
  • Stacy Shord
    • University of North Carolina Hospitals
  • John Valgus
    • University of North Carolina Hospitals
  • Donald Harvey
    • University of North Carolina Hospitals
  • Jessica Nagy
    • University of North Carolina Hospitals
  • Jennifer Stegal
    • University of North Carolina Hospitals
    • University of North Carolina Hospitals
    • University of North Carolina School of PharmacyUniversity of North Carolina
Original Article

DOI: 10.1007/s00520-003-0467-3

Cite this article as:
Treish, I., Shord, S., Valgus, J. et al. Support Care Cancer (2003) 11: 516. doi:10.1007/s00520-003-0467-3

Abstract

Goals

Our goal was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the Reliefband as an adjunct to standard antiemetics in patients receiving moderately-high to highly emetogenic chemotherapy.

Patients and methods

Forty-nine adult cancer patients receiving moderately-high or highly emetogenic chemotherapy were randomized to receive either the active Reliefband (n=26) or an inactive device (n=23). Patients continued to receive all scheduled and as needed antiemetic agents as prescribed. The device was worn the day of chemotherapy administration for 5 days (days 1–5). Patients maintained a daily dairy of nausea severity, vomiting and retching episodes, and antiemetic medications taken. Each patient completed a Functional Living Index Emesis (FLIE) and a tolerability survey at the conclusion of the study. A Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare the number of vomiting episodes, severity of nausea and FLIE scores between the two groups.

Main results

Patients wearing the active Relifband experienced less vomiting (Reliefband 1.9 versus inactive device 4.6 mean episodes; p=0.05), retching (1.4 versus 3.6 mean episodes; p=0.05), and nausea severity (0.91 versus 1.65 mean cm/day; p=0.01) over the 5-day period compared to patients wearing the inactive device. Vomiting was statistically significantly reduced during the delayed period (0.42 versus 1; p=0.032), whereas nausea was significantly reduced during the acute (0.71 versus 2.3; p=0.028) and delayed (1.8 versus 3.3; p=0.020) periods. FLIE scores did not differ between the two treatment groups (91 versus 80; p=0.088).

Conclusions

This study suggests that patients receiving moderately-high to highly emetogenic chemotherapy who experience nausea and vomiting despite scheduled antiemetics may benefit from the use of the Reliefband as an adjunct to antiemetics. Limitations of this study include differences in risk factors for emesis, chemotherapy, and antiemetic regimens. A larger, better, controlled randomized study is needed to better define optimal use of this device.

Keywords

AcustimulationTranscutaneous electrical stimulationAcupressureNauseaVomitingChemotherapyReliefband

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003