Skip to main content
Log in

Efficacy of combined physical and occupational therapy in patients with conservatively treated distal radius fracture: randomized controlled trial

  • original article
  • Published:
Wiener klinische Wochenschrift Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Aim

To evaluate the efficacy of combined physical and occupational therapy in comparison with physical therapy alone in patients with conservatively treated distal radius fracture.

Methods

Sixty-one participants, conservatively treated after a distal radius fracture, were included in a randomized and single-blind trial. Group A had physical therapy only (n = 31) and group B had physical and occupational therapy (n = 30). The assessment was performed three times: upon inclusion in the study in the first week after removal of the cast (T1), immediately after the end of the rehabilitation (T2), and 1 month after completing the rehabilitation (T3). The passive wrist range-of-motion, grip strength, and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score were used as rehabilitation outcomes.

Results

Rehabilitation outcomes were analyzed using two-way mixed analysis of variance. The effect of time was statistically significant (p < 0.001) for all outcomes. The group (therapy) factor was statistically significant for grip strength only (p = 0.038). The interaction effect was statistically significant for rotation (p = 0.034) and grip strength (p = 0.021). A comparison between time points T3:T1 showed statistically significant difference in grip strength in favor of group B 67 % (95 % CI 60–74 %) versus group A 53 % (95 % CI 45–61 %), p = 0.024.

Conclusion

The combined therapy resulted in a statistically significant increase of grip strength in comparison with isolated physical therapy in the period of 12–16 weeks after the fracture. This effectiveness was not confirmed with DASH score results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bengnér U, Johnell O. Increasing incidence of forearm fractures. A comparison of epidemiologic patterns 25 years apart. Acta Orthop Scand. 1985;56:158–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Black WS, Becker JA. Common forearm fractures in adults. Am Fam Physician. 2009;80(10):1096–102.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Thompson PW, Taylor J, Dawson A. The annual incidence and seasonal variation of fractures of the distal radius in men and women over 25 years in Dorset, UK. Int J Care Injured. 2004;35:462–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. McQueen MM, Court-Brown CM. Increasing age and fractures of the distal radius. Curr Orthopaed. 2003;17:360–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cummings SR, Melton LJ, III. Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet. 2002;359:1761–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Oyen J, Gjesdal CG, Brudvik C, Hove LM, Apalset EM, Gulseth, HC, et al. Low-energy distal radius fractures in middle-aged and elderly men and women—the burden of osteoporosis and fracture risk: a study of 1794 consecutive patients. Osteoporos Int. 2010;21:1257–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. International Distal Radius Fracture Study Group. How to classify distal radial fractures. A report by the IFSSH Bone and Joint Committee. http://www.eradius.com/IFSSH_classification_D1.htm. Accessed 2 April 2012.

  8. Figl M, Mayer M, Lederer S, Bogne R, Leixnering M. Extensor pollicis longus rupture after distal radius fracture: results of reconstruction by transposition of the extensor indicis tendon and postoperative dynamic splinting. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2011;123(15–16):485–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Foldhazy Z, Tornkvist H, Elmstedt E, Andersson G, Hagsten B, Ahrengart L. Long-term outcome of nonsurgically treated distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2007;32(9):1374–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Handoll HH, Mathok R. Conservative interventions for treating distal radial fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(2):CD000314.

  11. Schulte LM, Meals CG, Neviaser RJ. Management of adult diaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014;22(7):437–46. doi:10.5435/JAAOS-22-07-437.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Weninger P, Dall’Ara E, Drobetz H, et al. Multidirectional volar fixed-angle plating using cancellous locking screws for distal radius fractures—evaluation of three screw configurations in an extra-articular fracture model. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2011;123(1–2):4–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Watt CF, Taylor NF, Baskus K. Do Colles’ fracture patients benefit from routine referral to physiotherapy following cast removal? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000;120(7–8):413–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wakefield AE, McQueen MM. The role of physiotherapy and clinical predictors of outcome after fracture of the distal radius. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82(7):972–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nielsen TL, Dekkers MK. Progress and prediction of occupational performance in women with distal radius fractures: a one-year follow-up. Scand J Occup Ther. 2013;20(2):143–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Christensen OM, Kunov A, Hansen FF, Christiansen TC, Krasheninnikoff M. Occupational therapy and Colles’ fractures. Int Orthop. 2001;25(1):43–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Valdes K, Naughton N, Michlovitz S. Therapist supervised clinic-based therapy versus instruction in a home program following distal radius fracture: a systematic review. Hand Ther. 2014;27(3):165–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Norkin CC, White DJ, eds. Techniques and procedures in measurement of joint motion: a guide to goniometry. Philadelphia: FA Davis; 1988. pp. 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mathiowetz V, Kashman N, Volland G, Weber K, Dowe M, Rogers S. Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1984;66(2):69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bohannon RW, Peolsson A, Massy-Westropp N, Desrosiers J, Bear-Lehmane J. Reference values for adult grip strength measured with a Jamar dynamometer: a descriptive meta-analysis. Physio. 2006;92:11–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Westphal T, Piatek S, Schubert S, Schuschke T, Winckler S. Reliability and validity of the upper limb DASH questionnaire in patients with distal radius fractures. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2002;140(4):447–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Green D, Hotchkiss R, Pederson W, eds. et al. Green’s operative hand surgery. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2005. pp. 2015–44 (Chapter 59, Complex regional pain syndrome).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Harden RN, Bruehl SP. Diagnosis of complex regional pain syndrome: signs, symptoms, and new empirically derived diagnostic criteria. Clin J Pain. 2006;22(5):415–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Harden RN, Swan M, King A, Costa B, Barthel J. Treatment of complex regional pain syndrome: functional restoration. Clin J Pain. 2006;22(5):420–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hoang-Kim A, Pegreffi F, Moroni A, Ladd A. Measuring wrist and hand function: common scales and checklists. Injury. 2011;42(3):253–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Changulani M, Okonkwo U, Keswani T, Kalairajah Y. Outcome evaluation measures for wrist and hand—which one to choose? Int Orthop. 2008;32(1):1–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Srinivasan RC, Jain D, Richard MJ, Leversedge FJ, Mithani SK, Ruch DS. Isolated ulnar shortening osteotomy for the treatment of extra-articular distal radius malunion. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38(6):1106–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ketiš-Klemenc Z, Kersnik J. One month prevalence of self–reported musculoskeletal pain syndromes and correlates. Acta Medico–Biotechnica AMB. 2012;5(2):40–6.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Swart E, Nellans K, Rosenwasser M. The effects of pain, supination, and grip strength on patient-rated disability after operatively treated distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37(5):957–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wilcke MK, Abbaszadegan H, Adolphson PY. Patient-perceived outcome after displaced distal radius fractures. A comparison between radiological parameters, objective physical variables, and the DASH score. J Hand Ther. 2007;20(4):290–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ring D, Kadzielski J, Fabian L, Zurakowski D, Malhotra LR, Jupiter JB. Self-reported upper extremity health status correlates with depression. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(9):1983–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Magnus CR, Arnold CM, Johnston G, et al. Cross-education for improving strength and mobility after distal radius fractures: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(7):1247–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank Dušan Čelan, M.D., for his contribution during the initial search and the assessment of the abstracts and studies.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards statement

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dragan Lonzarić MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Filipova, V., Lonzarić, D. & Jesenšek Papež, B. Efficacy of combined physical and occupational therapy in patients with conservatively treated distal radius fracture: randomized controlled trial. Wien Klin Wochenschr 127 (Suppl 5), 282–287 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-015-0812-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-015-0812-9

Keywords

Navigation