Skip to main content
Log in

Geostatistical sampling optimization of contaminated facilities

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Geostatistics applied to radiological evaluation of nuclear premises provides methods to estimate radiological activities, together with their associated uncertainty. It enables a sophisticated sampling methodology combining radiation map and destructive samples. The radiological assessment is divided in two steps: first, a regular control of the surface activity is performed. Then, to assess the true contamination, concrete samples are collected and analyses are performed at several locations within the premises. These two types of measurement are first dealt separately, then cokriging techniques are applied to estimate the contamination over the premise, taking both information into account. This paper presents a methodological study of geostatistical and computational approaches to target suitable areas for additional radiological measures. In order to compare the proposed augmented sampling designs, several optimization criteria are taken into account. Their diversity ensures the coverage of a wide range of real problematics. Two algorithms (greedy algorithm and simulated annealing) are developed to optimize the chosen criterion value as a function of the location of the additional points. The sampling scenarios obtained with the different algorithms are compared in terms of optimization performance and computational efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bichon BJ, Eldred MS, Swiler LP, Mahadevan S, McFarland JM (2008) Efficient global reliability analysis for nonlinear implicit performance functions. AIAA J 46(10):2459–2468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chilès J-P, Delfiner P (1999) Geostatistics: modeling spatial uncertainty. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Desnoyers Y (2010) Approche méthodologique pour la caractérisation géostatistique des contaminations radiologiques dans les installations nucléaires. PhD, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris

  • Desnoyers Y, Chilès J-P, Dubot D, Jeannée N, Idasiak J-M (2011) Geostatistics for radiological evaluation: study of structuring of extreme values. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 25(8):1031–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P (1999) Geostatistics in soil science: state-of-the-art and perspectives. Geoderma 89(12):1–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulard M, Voltz M (1992) Linear coregionalization model: tools for estimation and choice of cross-variogram matrix. Math Geol 24(3):269–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeannée N, Desnoyers Y, Lamadie F, Iooss B (2008) Geostatistical sampling optimization of contaminated premises. DEM, Avignon

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220(4598):671–680

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krause A, Guestrin C (2007) Near-optimal observation selection using submodular functions. In: AAAI’07 proceedings of the 22nd national conference on artificial intelligence, vol 2

  • Modis C, Papantonopoulos G, Komnitsas K, Papaodysseus K (2008) Mapping optimization based on sampling size in earth related and environmental phenomena. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 22(1):83–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemhauser GL, Wolsey LA, Fisher ML (1978) An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions. Math program 14(1):265–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranjan P, Bingham D, Michailidis G (2008) Sequential experiment design for contour estimation from complex computer codes. Technometrics 50:527–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivoirard J (1994) Introduction to disjunctive kriging and non-linear geostatistics. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Romary T, Fouquet C, Malherbe L (2011) Sampling design for air quality measurement surveys: an optimisation approach. Atmos Environ 45(21):3613–3620

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weyland D (2008) Simulated annealing, its parameter settings and the longest common subsequence problem. ACM Press, New York, pp 803–810

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aurélien Bechler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bechler, A., Romary, T., Jeannée, N. et al. Geostatistical sampling optimization of contaminated facilities. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 27, 1967–1974 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-013-0731-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-013-0731-0

Keywords

Navigation