Abstract
Stochastic models are recent but unavoidable tools for snow avalanche hazard mapping that can be described in a general system framework. For the computation of design return periods, magnitude and frequency have to be evaluated. The magnitude model consists of a set of physical equations for avalanche propagation associated with a statistical formalism adapted to the input–output data structure. The friction law includes at least one latent friction coefficient. The Bayesian paradigm and the associated simulation techniques assist considerably in performing the inference and taking estimation errors into account for prediction. Starting from the general case, simplifying hypotheses allows computing the predictive distribution of high return periods on a case-study. Only release and runout altitudes are considered so that the model can use the French database. An inversible propagation model makes it possible to work with the latent friction coefficient as if it is observed. Prior knowledge is borrowed from an avalanche path with similar topographical characteristics. Justifications for the working hypotheses and further developments are discussed. In particular, the whole approach is positioned with respect to both deterministic and stochastic hydrology.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott MB, Bathurst JC et al (1986) An introduction to the European Hydrological System—Système Hydrologique Européen, ’SHE’, 1: History and philosophy of a physically-based distributed modelling system. J Hydrol 87:45–59
Adjel G (1996) Méthodes statistiques pour la détermination de la distance d’arrêt maximale des avalanches. Thèse de doctorat. Université Joseph Fourrier, Grenoble, France, p 156
Ancey C (2005) Monte Carlo calibration of avalanches described as Coulomb fluid flows. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 363:1529–1550 (doi: 10.1098/rsta.2005.1593)
Ancey C, Gervasoni C, Meunier M (2004) Computing extreme avalanches. Cold Reg Sci Technol 39:161–184
Bakkehoi S, Dormaas U, Lied K (1983) Calculation of snow avalanche runout distance. Ann Glaciol 4:24–29
Barbolini M, Keylock CJ (2002) A new method for avalanche hazard mapping using a combination of statistical and deterministic models. Nat Hazard Earth Syst Sci 2:239–245
Barbolini M, Gruber U, Keylock CJ, Naaim M, Salvi F (2000) Application of statistical and hydraulic-continuum dense-snow avalanche models to five real European sites. Cold Reg Sci Technol 31:133–149
Bartelt P, Salm B, Gruber U (1999) Calculating dense-snow avalanche runout using a Voellmy-fluid model with active/passive longitudinal straining. J Glaciol 45:242–254
Bayes T (1763) Essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 53:370–418; 54:296–325
Berger JO (1985) Statistical decision theory and Bayesian analysis, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg, p 617
Bergström S (1995) The HBV model. In: Singh VP (ed) Computer models in watershed hydrology. Water Resources Publications, Colorado, pp 443–476
Berliner M (2003) Physical-statistical modelling in geophysics. J Geophys Res 108(D24) (doi:10.1029/2002JD002865)
Bernardo JM, Smith AFM (1994) Bayesian theory. Wiley, London
Best N, Richardson S, Thomson A (2004) A comparison of Bayesian spatial models for disease mapping. Stat Methods Med Res 14(1):35–59
Beven K (1989) Changing ideas in hydrology—the case of physically-based models. J Hydrol 105:157–172
Bouchet A (2003) Etude expérimentale des avalanches denses de neige sèche. Thèse de doctorat. Université Joseph Fourrier, Grenoble, France, p 132
Bozhinskiy AN, Nazarov AN, Chernouss PA (2001) Avalanches: a probabilistic approach to modelling. Ann Glaciol 32:255–258
Brooks SP (2003) Bayesian computation: a statistical revolution. Trans R Stat Soc Ser A 15:2681–2697
Brooks SP, Gelman A (1998) General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. J Comput Graph Stat 7(4):434–455
Casassa G, Narita H, Maeno N (1989) Measurements of friction coefficients of snow blocks. Ann Glaciol 13:40–44
Christen M, Bartelt P, Gruber U (2002) Aval-1D: an avalanche dynamics program for the practice. In: Proceedings of the INTERPRAEVENT congress, vol 2, Matsumoto, Japan. Congress publication, pp 715–725
Clark JS (2005) Why environmental scientists are becoming Bayesians. Ecol Lett 8:2–14
Coles S (2001) An introduction to statistical modelling of extreme values. Springer, Heidelberg
Congdon P (2001) Bayesian satistical modelling. Wiley, London, 431p
Eckert N, Parent E (2006) Monte Carlo calibration of a dynamic model for avalanche predetermination using the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on avalanches and related subjects, Kirovsk, Russia
Eckert N, Parent E, Richard D (2006a) Revisiting statistical–topographical methods for avalanche predetermination: Bayesian modelling for runout distance predictive distribution. Cold Reg Sci Technol (accepted)
Eckert N, Parent E, Belanger L et al (2006b) Hierarchical modelling for spatial analysis of avalanche frequency at the scale of the township. Cold Reg Sci Technol (accepted)
Edijatno Nascimento NdO, Yang X, Makhlouf Z, Michel C (1999) GR3J: a daily watershed model with three free parameters. Hydrol Sci 4:263–277
Gelman A, Rubin DB (1992) Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Stat Sci 7:457–72
Grêt-Regamey A, Straub D (2006) Spatially explicit avalanche risk assessment linking Bayesian networks to a GIS. Nat Hazard Earth Syst Sci 6:911–926
Gruber U, Bartelt P, Haefner H (1998) Avalanche hazard mapping using numerical Voellmy-fluid models. In: Proceedings of the anniversary conference 25 years of snow avalanche research. Voss, Norway, pp 117–121
Gubler H (1993) Dense-flow avalanches, a discussion of experimental results and basic processes. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on rapid gravitational mass movements. Cemagref Grenoble, France, pp 127–136
Harbitz C, Issler D, Keylock CJ (1998) Conclusions from a recent survey of avalanche computational models. In: Proceedings of the anniversary conference 25 years of snow avalanche research, Voss, 12–16 May. Norvegian Geotechnical Institute publication, 203, pp 128–139
Harbitz C, Harbitz A, Farrokh N (2001) On probability analysis in snow avalanche hazard zoning. Ann Glaciol 32:290–298
Hutter K, Koch T, Plüss C, Savage S (1995) The dynamics of avalanches of granular materials from initiation to runout, part II: laboratory experiments. Acta Mech 109:127–165
Issler D (1997) Modelling of snow entrainment and deposition in powder snow avalanches. Ann Glaciol 26:253–258
Jamard AL, Garcia S, Bélanger L (2002) L’enquête permanente sur les Avalanches (EPA). Statistique descriptive générale des événements et des sites. DESS Ingéniérie Mathématique option Statistique, Université Joseph Fourrier, Grenoble, France. Avalaible online at http://www.avalanches.fr/ p 101
Jeffreys H (1939) Theory of probability. Oxford University Press, New York
Jibson RW, Harp EL, Michael JA (2000) A method for producing digital probabilistic seismic landslide hazard maps. Eng Geol 58:271–299
Kadane JB, Wolson LJ, O’Hagan A, Craig K (1998) Papers on elicitation with discussions. Statistician, pp 3–53
Karniadakis GE, Glimm J (2006) Uncertainty quantification in simulation science—preface. J Comput Phys 217:1–4
Kavetski D, Franks SW, Kuczera G (2002) Confronting input uncertainty in environmental modelling. In: Duan Q, Gupta HV, Sorooshian S, Rousseau AN, Turcotte R (eds) Calibration of watershed models. AGU Water Science and Applications Series 6, pp 49–68
Keylock CJ (2005). An alternative form for the statistical distribution of extreme avalanche runout distances. Cold Reg Sci Technol 42:185–193
Keylock CJ, Barbolini M (2001) Snow avalanche impact pressure—vulnerability relations for use in risk assessment. Can Geotech J 38:227–238
Kokkonen T, Koivusalo H, Karvonen T (2001) A semi-distributed approach to rainfall-runoff modelling: a case study in a snow affected catchment. Environ modell Softw 16:481–493
Krzysztofowicz R (1983) Why should a forecaster and a decision maker use Bayes Theorem. Water Resour Res 19(2):327–336
Krzysztofowicz R (2001) The case of probabilistic forecasting in hydrology. J Hydrol 249:2–9
Kuczera G, Parent E (1998) Monte Carlo assessment of parameter uncertainty in conceptual catchment models: the Metropolis algorithm. J Hydrol (211)1–4, pp 69–85
Lauritzen S (1996) Graphical models. Oxford University Press, New York
Lied K, Bakkehoi S (1980) Empirical calculations of snow-avalanche run-out distances based on topographic parameters. J Glaciol 26(94):165–176
Maggioni M (2004) Avalanche release Areas and their influence on uncertainty in avalanche hazard mapping. Chapiter 2: Monte Carlo simulations. PhD Thesis, University of Zurich
McClung D (2000) Extreme avalanche runout in space and time. Can Geotech J 37:161–170
McClung D (2001). Extreme avalanche runout: a comparison of empirical models. Can Geotech J 38:1254–1265
McClung D, Lied K (1987) Statistical and geometrical definition of snow-avalanche runout. Cold Reg Sci Technol 13:107–119
McClung D, Tweedy J (1994) Numerical avalanche prediction: Kootenay Pass, British Columbia, Canada. J Glaciol 40(135):350–358
McClung D, Mears AI, Schearer P (1989) Extreme avalanche run-out: data from four mountain ranges. Ann Glaciol 13:180–185
Mengersen KL, Robert CP, Guihennec-Jouyaux C (1999) MCMC convergence diagnostics: a review (with discussion). In: Bernardo JM, Berger JO, Dawid AP, Smith AFM (eds) Bayesian statistics. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 415–440
Metropolis N, Rosenbluth AW, Rosenbluth MN, Teller AH, Teller E (1953) Equation of state calculations by fast computing machine. J Chem Phys 21:1087–1091
Meunier M, Ancey C (2004) Towards a conceptual approach to predetermining high-return-period avalanche run-out distances. J Glaciol 50(169):268–278
Meunier M, Ancey C, Taillandier JM (2003) Fitting dynamic avalanche models with documented events at the Col du Lautaret site (France) using the conceptual approach. Cold Reg Sci Technol 39:55–66
Meunier M, Ancey C, Richard D (2004) L’approche conceptuelle pour l’étude des avalanches. Cemagref ed, p 245
Micovic Z, Quick MC (1999) A rainfall and snowmelt runoff modelling approach to flow estimation at ungauged sites in British Columbia. J Hydrol 226:101–120
Mougin P (1922). Les avalanches en Savoie. Ministère de l‘Agriculture, Direction Générale des Eaux et Forêts, Service des Grandes Forces Hydrauliques, Paris, France, pp 175–317
Naaim M (1998) Contribution to snow drift and avalanches flows modelling. Habilitation Thesis. University Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France, p 180
Naaim M, Naaim-Bouvet F, Faug T, Bouchet A (2004) Dense snow avalanche modelling: flow, erosion, deposition and obstacle effects. Cold Reg Sci Technol 39:193–204
Naveau P, Nogaj M, Amman C et al (2005) Statistical methods for the analysis of climate extremes. C R Geosci 335:1013–1022
Oakley J, O’Hagan A (2004) Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of complex models: a Bayesain approach. J R Stat Soc B 66:651–659
Parent E, Bernier J (2003) Bayesian P.O.T. modelling for historical data. J Hydrol 274:95–108
Perrin C, Michel C, Andreassian V (2001) Does a large number of parameters enhance model performance? Comparative assessment of common catchment model structures on 429 catchments. J Hydrol 242:275–301
Pickands J (1975) Statistical inference using extreme order statistics. Ann Stat 3:11–130
Robert CP, Casella G (1998) Monte Carlo statistical methods. Springer, Heidelberg
Salm B, Burkard A, Gubler HU (1990) Berechnung von Fliesslawinen: eine Anleitung für Praktiker mit Beispilen. SLF Davos technical report 47
Savage SB, Hutter K (1989) The motion of a finite mass of granular material down a rough incline. J Fluid Mech 199:177–215
Savage S, Hutter K (1991) The dynamics of avalanches of granular materials from initiation to runout, part 1: analysis. Acta Mech 86:201–233
Sigurdsson S, Jonasson K, Arnalds K (1998) Transferring avalanches between paths. In: Proceedings of the anniversary conference 25 years of snow avalanche research, Voss, 12–16 May. Norvegian Geotechnical Institute publication 203, pp 259–263
Sovilla B (2004) Field experiments and numerical modelling of mass entrainment and deposition processes in snow avalanches. PhD Thesis, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
Sovilla B, Sommavilla F, Tomaselli A (2001) Measurements of mass balance in dense snow avalanche events. Ann Glaciol 32:230–236
Spiegelhalter DJ, Thomas DJ, Best A (2000) WinBUGS version 1.3 user manual. MRC Biostatistics Unit
Tanner MH (1992) Tools for statistical inference: observed data and data augmentation methods. Springer, Heidelberg
Torre F, Boreux J-J, Parent E (2001) The Metropolis–Hastings Algorithm, a handy tool for the practice of environmental model estimation: illustration with biochemical oxygen demand data. Cybergéo, article#187, 34 pp. Available at http://www.cybergeo.presse.fr/
Voellmy A (1955) Über die Zerstörungskraft von Lawinen. Schweizerische Bauzeitung, Jahrg, 73, 12, pp 159–162, 212–217, 246–249 and 280–285
Zwinger T (2000) Dynamik einer Trockenschneelawine auf beliebig geformten Berghängen. PhD Thesis, Technische Universität Wien
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eckert, N., Parent, E., Naaim, M. et al. Bayesian stochastic modelling for avalanche predetermination: from a general system framework to return period computations. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 22, 185–206 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-007-0107-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-007-0107-4