Original Article

Trees

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 137-144

Vulnerability to embolism differs in roots and shoots and among three Mediterranean conifers: consequences for stomatal regulation of water loss?

  • Fabienne FrouxAffiliated withEcologie et Ecophysiologie Forestières, UMR INRA—UHPUnité de Recherches Forestières Méditerranéennes, INRA
  • , Michel DucreyAffiliated withUnité de Recherches Forestières Méditerranéennes, INRA
  • , Erwin DreyerAffiliated withEcologie et Ecophysiologie Forestières, UMR INRA—UHP
  • , Roland HucAffiliated withUnité de Recherches Forestières Méditerranéennes, INRA Email author 

Rent the article at a discount

Rent now

* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.

Get Access

Abstract

We investigated the potential links between stomatal control of transpiration and the risk of embolism in root and shoot xylem of seedlings of three Mediterranean conifers (Cupressus sempervirens, Pinus halepensis and P. nigra) grown in a greenhouse under semi-controlled conditions. We measured the intrinsic vulnerability to embolism in roots and current year shoots by the air injection method. Root and shoot segments were subjected to increasing pressures, and the induced loss of hydraulic conductivity recorded. The three species displayed very different vulnerabilities in shoots, with P. nigra being much more vulnerable than P. halepensis and C. sempervirens. Roots were distinctly more vulnerable than shoots in C. sempervirens and P. halepensis (50% loss of conductivity induced at 3.0 MPa and 1.7 MPa higher xylem water potential in roots vs shoots). In P. nigra, no significant difference of vulnerability between shoots and roots was found. Seedlings were subjected to soil drought, and stomatal conductance, twig hydraulic conductivity and needle water potential were measured. The water potential resulting in almost complete stomatal closure (90%) was very close to the threshold water potential inducing loss of conductivity (10%) in twigs in P nigra, resulting in a very narrow safety margin between stomatal closure and embolism induction. The safety margin was larger in P. halepensis and greatest in C. sempervirens. Unexpectedly, this water potential threshold produced a 30–50% loss of conductivity in 3–5 mm diameter roots, depending on the species. The implications of this finding are discussed.

Keywords

Xylem embolism Stomatal conductance Drought Cupressus sempervirens Pinus