Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A hands-free region-of-interest selection interface for solo surgery with a wide-angle endoscope: preclinical proof of concept

  • New Technology
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A hands-free region-of-interest (ROI) selection interface is proposed for solo surgery using a wide-angle endoscope. A wide-angle endoscope provides images with a larger field of view than a conventional endoscope. With an appropriate selection interface for a ROI, surgeons can also obtain a detailed local view as if they moved a conventional endoscope in a specific position and direction.

Methods

To manipulate the endoscope without releasing the surgical instrument in hand, a mini-camera is attached to the instrument, and the images taken by the attached camera are analyzed. When a surgeon moves the instrument, the instrument orientation is calculated by an image processing. Surgeons can select the ROI with this instrument movement after switching from ‘task mode’ to ‘selection mode.’ The accelerated KAZE algorithm is used to track the features of the camera images once the instrument is moved. Both the wide-angle and detailed local views are displayed simultaneously, and a surgeon can move the local view area by moving the mini-camera attached to the surgical instrument.

Results

Local view selection for a solo surgery was performed without releasing the instrument. The accuracy of camera pose estimation was not significantly different between camera resolutions, but it was significantly different between background camera images with different numbers of features (P < 0.01). The success rate of ROI selection diminished as the number of separated regions increased. However, separated regions up to 12 with a region size of 160 × 160 pixels were selected with no failure. Surgical tasks on a phantom model and a cadaver were attempted to verify the feasibility in a clinical environment.

Conclusions

Hands-free endoscope manipulation without releasing the instruments in hand was achieved. The proposed method requires only a small, low-cost camera and an image processing. The technique enables surgeons to perform solo surgeries without a camera assistant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rahman MN, Mishra R (2011) The camera-holding robotic device in laparoscopy surgery. World J Laparosc Surg 4:132–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sackier JM, Wang Y (1994) Robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 8:63–66

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gilbert J (2009) The EndoAssist™ robotic camera holder as an aid to the introduction of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 91:389–393

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Buess G, Arezzo A, Schurr M, Ulmer F, Fisher H, Gumb L, Testa T, Nobman C (2000) A new remote-controlled endoscope positioning system for endoscopic solo surgery. Surg Endosc 14:395–399

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yasunaga T, Hashizume M, Kobayashi E, Tanoue K, Akahoshi T, Konishi K, Yamaguchi S, Kinjo N, Tomikawa M, Muragaki Y (2003) Remote-controlled laparoscope manipulator system, Naviot™, for endoscopic surgery. International Congress series. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 678–683

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kobayashi E, Masamune K, Sakuma I, Dohi T (2000) A wide-angle view endoscope system using wedge prisms. In: Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention—MICCAI 2000, Springer, pp 661–668

  7. Tamadazte B, Agustinos A, Cinquin P, Fiard G, Voros S (2015) Multi-view vision system for laparoscopy surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 10:195–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cao A, Darin Ellis R, Composto A, Pandya AK, Klein MD (2006) Supplemental wide field-of-view monitor improves performance in surgical telerobotic movement time. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 2:364–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jung K, Kang D-J, Kekatpure AL, Adikrishna A, Hong J, Jeon I-H (2016) A new wide-angle arthroscopic system: a comparative study with a conventional 30° arthroscopic system. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:1722–1729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sekiya T, Ito E, Kanai M, Matsumoto M (2006) Development of a dual-view endoscope system. In: Biomedical optics 2006, International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp 60800E-1–60800E-10

  11. Tsunezuka H, Kato D, Terauchi K, Shimomura M, Ichise K, Ito K, Nishikawa A, Shimada J (2011) Analysis of surgeon’s line of sight using an optical tracking system with a multifaceted marker device. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 6:803–809

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Singh H, Karar V, Kumar N, Saini SS (2013) Performance comparison: optical and magnetic head tracking. Int J IT Eng Appl Sci Res 2:27–32

    Google Scholar 

  13. Alcantarilla PF, Solutions T (2011) Fast explicit diffusion for accelerated features in nonlinear scale spaces. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 34:1281–1298

    Google Scholar 

  14. Alcantarilla PF, Bartoli A, Davison AJ (2012) KAZE features. In: Computer vision—ECCV 2012, Springer, pp 214–227

  15. Lowe DG (2004) Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int J Comput Vis 60:91–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Luong Q-T, Faugeras OD (1996) The fundamental matrix: theory, algorithms, and stability analysis. Int J Comput Vis 17:43–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Perrin M, Fletcher A (2004) Laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain 4:107–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tan W, Liu H, Dong Z, Zhang G, Bao H (2013) Robust monocular SLAM in dynamic environments. In: Mixed and augmented reality (ISMAR), 2013 IEEE international symposium on, IEEE, pp 209–218

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported, in part, by the Health and Medical R&D Program of the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Korea (HI13C1634).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to In-Ho Jeon or Jaesung Hong.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Kyunghwa Jung, Hyunseok Choi, Hanpyo Hong, Arnold Adikrishna, In-Ho Jeon, and Jaesung Hong have a patent tool for selection of image of region of interest and its use of selection method issued to Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology and Asan Medical Center. Kyunghwa Jung, Hyunseok Choi, Hanpyo Hong, Arnold Adikrishna, In-Ho Jeon, and Jaesung Hong have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jung, K., Choi, H., Hong, H. et al. A hands-free region-of-interest selection interface for solo surgery with a wide-angle endoscope: preclinical proof of concept. Surg Endosc 31, 974–980 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5013-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5013-8

Keywords

Navigation