Skip to main content
Log in

Sedation methods can determine performance of endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with gastric neoplasia

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although proper sedation is mandatory for endoscopic procedures such as endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), there is no research investigating the effects of sedation on ESD performance and complications. We aimed to evaluate the relationship among sedation methods, clinical outcomes, and complications after ESD for gastric neoplasia.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed clinical data of 1,367 patients with 1,485 lesions who had undergone ESD for gastric adenoma or early gastric cancer at our tertiary teaching hospital in Seoul, Korea, between January 2008 and May 2011. Of these, 1,035 lesions in 958 patients were included in the intermittent midazolam/propofol injection by endoscopists (IMIE) group, and 450 lesions in 409 patients were included in the continuous propofol infusion with opioid administration by anesthesiologists (CPIA) group.

Results

En bloc resection and complete resection rates were higher in the CPIA group than in the IMIE group (CPIA vs. IMIE; en bloc resection, 99.8 and 95.0 %, P < 0.001; complete resection, 94.2 and 88.3 %, P < 0.001). Duration of procedure was shorter in the CPIA group than in the IMIE group (CPIA vs. IMIE; 48.2 ± 32.5 and 57.6 ± 41.3 min, P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, sedation method was an independent factor associated with en bloc resection and complete resection. Additionally, sedation with CPIA was not a risk factor for bleeding (P = 0.403) or perforation (P = 0.474); however, aspiration pneumonia developed more frequently in patients sedated with CPIA (CPIA vs. IMIE, 4.4 and 1.5 %, P = 0.002).

Conclusions

Sedation with CPIA can improve ESD performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miyamoto S, Muto M, Hamamoto Y, Boku N, Ohtsu A, Baba S, Yoshida M, Ohkuwa M, Hosokawa K, Tajiri H, Yoshida S (2002) A new technique for endoscopic mucosal resection with an insulated-tip electrosurgical knife improves the completeness of resection of intramucosal gastric neoplasms. Gastrointest Endosc 55:576–581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gotoda T, Yamamoto H, Soetikno RM (2006) Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer. J Gastroenterol 41:929–942

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Akasaka T, Nishida T, Tsutsui S, Michida T, Yamada T, Ogiyama H, Kitamura S, Ichiba M, Komori M, Nishiyama O, Nakanishi F, Zushi S, Nishihara A, Iijima H, Tsujii M, Hayashi N (2011) Short-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric neoplasm: multicenter survey by Osaka University ESD Study Group. Dig Endosc 23:73–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yamagata T, Hirasawa D, Fujita N, Suzuki T, Obana T, Sugawara T, Ohira T, Harada Y, Maeda Y, Koike Y, Suzuki K, Noda Y (2011) Efficacy of propofol sedation for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD): assessment with prospective data collection. Intern Med 50:1455–1460

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee H, Yun WK, Min BH, Lee JH, Rhee PL, Kim KM, Rhee JC, Kim JJ (2011) A feasibility study on the expanded indication for endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 25:1985–1993

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ahn JY, Jung HY, Choi KD, Choi JY, Kim MY, Lee JH, Choi KS, Kim do H, Song HJ, Lee GH, Kim JH, Park YS (2011) Endoscopic and oncologic outcomes after endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer: 1370 cases of absolute and extended indications. Gastrointest Endosc 74:485–493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen LB, Wecsler JS, Gaetano JN, Benson A, Miller KM, Durkalski V, Aisenberg J (2006) Endoscopic sedation in the United States: results from a nationwide survey. Am J Gastroenterol 101:967–974

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Hidaka N, Ichise Y, Kajiyama M, Tanaka N (2009) Low-dose propofol sedation for diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy: results in 10,662 adults. Am J Gastroenterol 104:1650–1655

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cote GA, Hovis RM, Ansstas MA, Waldbaum L, Azar RR, Early DS, Edmundowicz SA, Mullady DK, Jonnalagadda SS (2010) Incidence of sedation-related complications with propofol use during advanced endoscopic procedures. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 8:137–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Riphaus A, Rabofski M, Wehrmann T (2010) Endoscopic sedation and monitoring practice in Germany: results from the first nationwide survey. Z Gastroenterol 48:392–397

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bo L, Bai Y, Bian J, Wen P, Li J, Deng X (2011) Propofol vs traditional sedative agents for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 17:3538–3543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kiriyama S, Gotoda T, Sano H, Oda I, Nishimoto F, Hirashima T, Kusano C, Kuwano H (2010) Safe and effective sedation in endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a randomized comparison between propofol continuous infusion and intermittent midazolam injection. J Gastroenterol 45:831–837

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Aisenberg J, Cohen LB, Piorkowski JD (2007) Propofol use under the direction of trained gastroenterologists: an analysis of the medicolegal implications. Am J Gastroenterol 102:707–713

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Matsui N, Akahoshi K, Nakamura K, Ihara E, Kita H (2012) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for removal of superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms: a technical review. World J Gastrointest Endosc 4:123–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ho W, Yen C, Lan C, Lin C, Yong S, Hwang K, Chou M (2012) Comparison between the recovery time of alfentanil and fentanyl in balanced propofol sedation for gastrointestinal and colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized study. BMC Gastroenterol 12:164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2011) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma. 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer 14:101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Garner JS, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, Horan TC, Hughes JM (1988) CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control 16:128–140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Vargo J, Zuccaro G, Dumot JA, Shermock KM, Morrow JB, Conwell DL, Trolli PA, Maurer WG (2002) Gastroenterologist-administered propofol versus meperidine and midazolam for advanced upper endoscopy: a prospective, randomized trial. Gastroenterology 123:8–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Walker JA, McIntyre RD, Schleinitz PF, Jacobson KN, Haulk A, Adesman P, Tolleson S, Parent R, Donnelly R, Rex DK (2003) Nurse-administered propofol sedation without anesthesia specialists in 9152 endoscopic cases in an ambulatory surgery center. Am J Gastroenterol 98:1744–1750

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sasaki T, Tanabe S, Azuma M, Sato A, Naruke A, Ishido K, Katada C, Higuchi K, Koizumi W (2012) Propofol sedation with bispectral index monitoring is useful for endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized prospective phase II clinical trial. Endoscopy 44:584–589

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Qadeer MA, Vargo J, Khandwala F, Lopez R, Zuccaro G (2005) Propofol versus traditional sedative agents for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 3:1049–1056

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wehrmann T, Triantafyllou K (2010) Propofol sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a gastroenterologist’s perspective. Digestion 82:106–109

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Miyata M, Yokoyama Y, Okoyama N, Joh T, Seno K, Sasaki M, Ohara H, Nomura T, Kasugai K, Itoh M (2000) What are the appropriate indications for endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer? Analysis of 256 endoscopically resected lesions. Endoscopy 32:773–778

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ohkuwa M, Hosokawa K, Boku N, Ohtu A, Tajiri H, Yoshida S (2001) New endoscopic treatment for intramucosal gastric tumors using an insulated-tip diathermic knife. Endoscopy 33:221–226

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Park Y, Cho E, Kang H, Kim J (2011) The effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Surg Endosc 25:2666–2677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Isomoto H, Ohnita K, Yamaguchi N, Fukuda E, Ikeda K, Nishiyama H, Akiyama M, Ozawa E, Nakao K, Kohno S, Shikuwa S (2010) Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection in elderly patients with early gastric cancer. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 22:311–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee IL, Wu CS, Tung SY, Lin PY, Shen CH, Wei KL, Chang TS (2008) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancers: experience from a new endoscopic center in Taiwan. J Clin Gastroenterol 42:42–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bleach NR (1993) The gag reflex and aspiration: a retrospective analysis of 120 patients assessed by videofluoroscopy. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 18:303–307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tagaito Y, Isono S, Nishino T (1998) Upper airway reflexes during a combination of propofol and fentanyl anesthesia. Anesthesiology 88:1459–1466

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Yoshida H, Ayuse T, Ishizaka S, Ishitobi S, Nogami T, Oi K (2007) Management of exaggerated gag reflex using intravenous sedation in prosthodontic treatment. Tohoku J Exp Med 212:373–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Supported in part by a faculty research grant of Yonsei University College of Medicine for 2011 (Grant 6-2011-0103).

Disclosures

Chan Hyuk Park, Jae Hoon Min, Young-Chul Yoo, Hyunzu Kim, Dong Hoo Joh, Jung Hyun Jo, Suji Shin, Hyuk Lee, Jun Chul Park, Sung Kwan Shin, Yong Chan Lee, and Sang Kil Lee have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sang Kil Lee.

Additional information

Chan Hyuk Park and Jae Hoon Min have contributed equally to this study, and both should be considered first author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Park, C.H., Min, J.H., Yoo, YC. et al. Sedation methods can determine performance of endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with gastric neoplasia. Surg Endosc 27, 2760–2767 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2804-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2804-z

Keywords

Navigation