Article

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 25, Issue 6, pp 1969-1974

Bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in hospitals with and without surgical residency programs: is there a difference?

  • Vincent L. HarrisonAffiliated withDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University
  • , James P. DolanAffiliated withDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University
  • , Thai H. PhamAffiliated withDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University
  • , Brian S. DiggsAffiliated withDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University
  • , Alexander J. GreensteinAffiliated withDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University
  • , Brett C. SheppardAffiliated withDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University
  • , John G. HunterAffiliated withDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University Email author 

Rent the article at a discount

Rent now

* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.

Get Access

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a common surgical procedure performed by surgical residents under the supervision of attending surgeons. There is a perception that performance of LC in a facility with a surgical training program provides a safer environment due to the presence of an assistant surgeon. The aim of this study was to compare the rate of bile duct injury, conversion, and mortality between hospitals with surgical residency programs (Group I) and hospitals without surgical training programs (Group II).

Methods

ICD-9 diagnosis and procedure codes were used to extract and analyze LC procedures from the Florida State Inpatient Database from 1997 through 2006. Bile duct injury was indicated by the code for a biliary reconstruction procedure performed during the same admission. Hospitals with surgical training programs were identified by participation in the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) and verified by contact with each hospital.

Results

Between 1997 and 2006 there were 234,220 LCs identified, with 17,596 performed by Group I and 213,906 performed by Group II. Rate of BDI for Group I and Group II was 0.24 and 0.26%, respectively (p = 0.71). There was a significant difference noted in emergency and urgent admission rates (65.6% for Group I vs. 77.2% for Group II; p < 0.001) and conversion (9.1% for Group I vs. 7.5% for Group II; p < 0.001). Mortality was 0.44% for Group I and 0.55% for Group II (p = 0.060).

Conclusion

Our data suggest that bile duct injury rates are not influenced by the presence of a surgical residency program. In addition, there was no significant difference in mortality for LC at hospitals with surgical residencies when compared to hospitals without surgical residencies. A significant difference was noted in admission type and conversion rate but this did not appear to affect the rate of bile duct injury.

Keywords

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Bile duct reconstruction Resident Teaching hospital